Comparison of Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Buccal Fat Pad Graft in the Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Prospective Pilot Study
- 211 Downloads
To evaluate the application of extended nasolabial flap versus buccal fat pad graft in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis.
Settings and Design
This prospective study was carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Chennai.
Material and Methods
A total of 8 patients (6 men and 2 women) with age range from 21 to 65 years were selected for study. These 8 patients were randomly divided into two groups of four namely group 1 and group 2. In group 1 patients, reconstruction was planned with extended nasolabial flaps and in group 2 patients, reconstruction was planned with buccal fat pad graft respectively.
Statistical Analysis Used
Paired t test, Independent sample t test, ANOVA test.
The mean preoperative mouth opening in group 1 was 8.5 mm and in group 2 was 11.75 mm. The mean increase in group 1 after one year of postoperative period was 21.50 mm and in group 2 was 24.75 mm.
In the present study, buccal fat pad graft proved to give better results as the interposition material as it has good patient acceptance, rapid epithelization, minimal donor site morbidity and minimal intra and postoperative complications.
KeywordsOral submucous fibrosis Extended nasolabial flap Buccal fat pad graft Inter-incisal mouth opening
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest for any author.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Kaviraj BK (1911) An english translation of the Susruta Samhita Vol. II Nidhana-sthana to Kalp-sthana. 111–112 [Chapter 16]Google Scholar
- 2.Schwartz J (1952). Atrophia idiopathica mucosa oris. In: Presented at the 11th International Dental Congress, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Joshi SG (1953) Submucous fibrosis of the palate and pillars. Indian J Otolaryngol 4:1–4Google Scholar
- 24.Gupta DS, Dolas R, Iqbal A (1992) “Treatment modalities in submucous fibrosis- How they stand today?” Study of 600 cases. Indian J Oral Maxillofac Surg 7(43):1Google Scholar
- 29.Kumar A, Sharma SC, Sharma P et al (1991) Beneficial effect of oral zinc in the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis. Indian J Pharmacol 23:236Google Scholar
- 37.Khanna JN (1995) Oral submucous fibrosis: a new concept in surgical management: report of 100 cases. IJOMS 24:433–439Google Scholar