Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new strategy to optimize the sensors placement in wireless sensor networks

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a strategy that allows to optimize the typical deployment of sensors on a field and distribute the energy consumption of the wireless sensor network (WSN). This strategy is concerned with collecting information from the sensors more than the exact localization of a sensor. Therefore, we refer to the optimal placement of sensors, which measures in terms of distribution or density of sensors over regions, rather than its geographical location. Using this strategy we can maximize the network lifetime under the constraint that connectivity is preserved. Many applications such as border zone control (BZC), battle field surveillance, fire prevention/detection, etc., can employe the proposed strategy to achieve its missions. Here, two optimization problems are presented; one corresponds to short-term monitoring applications and the other corresponds to long-term monitoring ones. A mathematical analysis has been performed to find out a formula for the optimal placement of the sensor. To testify our work, a computer-based model is built using OpNet discrete event simulator. The results show that our optimization strategy outperforms the other proposed strategies. This is because the energy consumption based on our strategy tends to be evenly distributed (i.e. resembles a uniform distribution) over the entire network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal D (2017) Embedded sensor systems . Springer, Berlin, pp 197–208

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alkaline Technical Information (2017). http://www.energizer.com/

  • Al-Karaki J, Gawanmeh A (2017) The optimal deployment, coverage, and connectivity problems in wireless sensor networks: revisited. IEEE Access 5:18051–18065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Karaki J, Kamal A (2004) Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Wirel Commun 11:6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barragan D, Gonzalez V (2008) Towards an optimal placement of sensors in wireless sensor networks with dynamic routing. Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, New York, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng P, Chuah C, Liu X (2004) Energy-aware Node Placement in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Glob Telecommun Conf 5:3210–3214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chokr BA, Kreinovich V (1994) How far are we from the complete knowledge: complexity of knowledge acquisition in the Dempster–Shafer approach. Advances in the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence. Wiley, New York, pp 555–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossbow Technology Inc. (2011) MICAz datasheet. http://www.xbow.com/

  • Du R, Gkatzikis L, Fischione C, Xiao M (2017) On maximizing sensor network lifetime by energy balancing. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2017.2696363

  • Jaynes E, Bretthorst G (2003) Probability theory: the logic of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klir G (2005) Uncertainty and information: foundations of generalized information theory. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuorilehto M, Kohvakka M, Suhonen J, Hmlinen P, Hnniknen M, Hamalainen T (2008) Ultra-low energy wireless sensor networks in practice: theory, realization and deployment. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawat P, Singh K, Chaouchi H, Bonnin J (2013) Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies. J Supercomput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-013-1021-9

  • riverbed.com (2017). https://www.riverbed.com/gb/products /steelcentral/opnet.html

  • Rmer K, Friedemann M (2004) The design space of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 11:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schurgers C, Srivastava M (2001) Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE Military communications conference MILCOM. Communications for network-centric operations: creating the information force, vol 1, pp 357–361

  • Sengupta S, Das S, Nasir M, Panigrahi B (2013) Multi-objective node deployment in WSNs: in search of an optimal trade-off among coverage, lifetime, energy consumption, and connectivity. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26:405416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami A, Zhao Q, Hong Y, Tong L (2007) Wireless sensor networks: signal processing and communications. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Toumpis S, Tassiulas L (2006) Optimal deployment of large wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52:2935–2953

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Y, Yang K, Yeh S (2008) Non-uniform node deployment for lifetime extension in large-scale randomly distributed wireless sensor networks. In: 22nd international conference on advanced information networking and applications, pp 517–524

  • Wang Y, Hu C, Tseng Y (2008) Efficient placement and dispatch of sensors in a wireless sensor network. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 7:262–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu K, Wang Q, Hassanein H, Takahara G (2005) Optimal wireless sensor networks (WSNs) deployment: minimum cost with lifetime constraint. In: IEEE international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications, vol 3, pp 454–461

  • Yang H, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Ji Y, Han J, Lin Y, Lee Y (2015) CSO: cross stratum optimization for optical as a service. IEEE Commun Mag 53:130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Zhang J, Ji Y, Lee Y (2016) C-RoFN: multi-stratum resources optimization for cloud-based radio over optical fiber networks. IEEE Commun Mag 54:118125

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Ji Y, Wu J, Han J, Lin Y, Lee Y (2016) Performance evaluation of multi-stratum resources optimization with network functions virtualization for cloud-based radio over optical fiber networks. Opt Express 24:8666–8678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong F, Xiaotong Z, Shihong D, Dong W (2006) Energy consumption distribution-aware node placement in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In: International conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, pp 1-4

  • Yoon S, Dutta R, Sichitiu M (2007) Power aware routing algorithms for wireless sensor networks. In: 3rd international conference on wireless and mobile communications ICWMC ’07. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWMC.2007.69

  • Zhao Q, Gurusamy M (2008) Lifetime maximization for connected target coverage in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw (TON) 16:13781391

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigbee.org (2017). http://www.zigbee.org/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank N. Kambhampati for the computer model used for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Musa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Musa, A., Gonzalez, V. & Barragan, D. A new strategy to optimize the sensors placement in wireless sensor networks. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10, 1389–1399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0868-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0868-2

Keywords

Navigation