Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing performance of rigid polyurethane foam using FGP models

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research proposes and implements fuzzy goal programming (FGP) models to optimize the performance of rigid polyurethane foam (RPF) for four quality characteristics. At initial process factor settings, the RPF process was found incapable for density, shrinkage ratio, and expanding ratio. However, it was found highly capable for compressive strength at 10% deformation. As a result, costly nonconforming products were produced and delivered. For this reason, fuzzy goal programming models were proposed and implemented to determine the combination of optimal factors settings followed by confirmation experiments. The results showed that: (1) for density the capability index is enhanced from −1.72 to (0.66, 0.62, and 0.85) at lower, middle and upper optimal factor setting levels, respectively, (2) for compressive stress at 10% deformation, the capability index is improved from 5.32, to (6.98, 5.45, and 6.02), (3) for shrinkage ratio the process capability is highly capable; \({{\widehat{C}}_{pu}}\) becomes (4.56, 4.62, and 5.91), and (4) for expanding ratio the capability index becomes highly capable; \({{\widehat{C}}_{pu}}\), equals to (6.37, 6.30, and 6.88). Such improvements in process capability result in significant savings in quality, maintenance, and production costs. In conclusions, implementing fuzzy goal programming model is found an efficient technique to optimal RPF performance for four quality responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Refaie A (2013) A proposed weighted additive model to optimize multiple quality responses in the Taguchi method with applications. J Process Mech Eng 229(3):168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Refaie A (2014a) A proposed satisfaction model to optimize process performance with multiple quality responses in the Taguchi method. J Eng Manuf 228(2):291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Refaie A, Li M-H (2011) Optimizing the performance of plastic injection molding using weighted additive model in goal programming. Int J Fuzzy Syst Appl 22(07):676–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Refaie A, Diabat A, Li MH (2014) Optimizing tablets’ quality with multiple responses using fuzzy goal programming. J Process Mech Eng 228(2):115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashiri M, Hosseininezhad S (2009) A Fuzzy Programming for Optimizing Multi Response Surface in Robust Designs. J Uncert Syst 3(3):163–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Biedermann A, Kudoke C, Merten A, Minogue E, Rotermund U, Siefert H, Ebert HP, Heinemann U, Fricke J (2001) Heat transfer mechanisms in polyurethane rigid foam. High Temp High Pressures 33(6):699–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briody C, Duignan B, Jerrams S, Ronan S (2012) Prediction of compressive creep behavior in flexible polyurethane foam over long time scales and at elevated temperatures. Polymer Test 31:1019–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12(4):214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachovich D, O’toole BJ, Hawkins MC, Sapochak L (2005) Temperature and mold size effect on physical and mechanical properties of a polyurethane foam. J Cell Plast 41(2):153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasparek E, Zencker U, Scheidemann R, VÕlzke H, Mũler K (2011) Numerical and experimental studies of polyurethane foam under impact loading. Comput Mater Sci 50(4):1353–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisiecki J, Klysz S, Blazejewicz T, Gmurczyk G, Reymer P (2014) Tomographic examination of auxetic polyurethane foam structure. Phys Status Solidi B Basic Solid State Phys 251(2):314–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maji A, Schreyer H, Donald S, Zuo Q, Satpathi D (1995) Mechanical- properties of polyurethane-foam impact limiters. J Eng Mech 121(4):528–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsavina L, Linul E, Voiconi T, Sadowski T (2013) A comparison between dynamic and static fracture toughness of polyurethane foams. Polymer Test 32(4):673–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan RB, O’toole BJ, Malpica J, Hatchett DW, Kodippili G, Kinyanjui JM (2008) Effect of processing temperature on ReCrete polyurethane foam. J Cell Plast 44(4):327–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasirzadeh R, Saber AR (2014) Study of foam density variation in composite sandwich panels under high velocity impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 63:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan K (2014) Strength-based design optimization studies on rigid polyurethane foam core-glass and carbon-glass fabric face sheet/epoxy matrix sandwich composites. Mech Adv Mater Struct 21(3):191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Saddler JN (2013) Effect of replacing Polyol by Organosolv and kraft lignin on the property and structure of rigid polyurethane foam. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha MC, Kabir Md.E, Jelani S (2008) Enhancement on thermal and mechanical properties of polyurethane foam infused with nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng A 479(1–2):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirna U, Beverte I, Yakushin V, Cabulis U (2011) Mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane foams at room and cryogenic temperatures. J Cell Plast 47(4):337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate PCM, Talal S (1999) Compressive properties of rigid polyurethane foams. Polymers Polymer Compos 7(2):117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirumal M, Khastgir D, Singha N, Manjunath B, Naik Y (2008) Effect of foam density on the properties of water blown rigid polyurethane foam. J Appl Polymer Sci 108(3):1810–1817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinti A, Tarzia A, Passaro A, Angiuli R (2014) Thermo graphic analysis of polyurethane foams integrated with phase change materials designed for dynamic thermal insulation in refrigerated transport. Appl Therm Eng 70(1):201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu ZH, Shim VPW, Lim CT (2001) Plastic deformation modes in rigid polyurethane foam under static loading. Int J Solids Struct 38(50–51):9267–9279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacoub F, Macgregor JF (2003) Analysis and optimization of a polyurethane reaction injection molding (RIM) process using multivariate projection method. Chemo Metrics Intell Lab Syst 65(1):17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghoobi MA, Jones DF, Tamiz M (2008) Weighted additive models for solving fuzzy goal programming problems. Asia-Pac J Oper Res 25(5):715–733

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Ignizio J (1991) Fuzzy programming with nonlinear membership functions: piecewise linear approximation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 41:39–53

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yu-Hallada LC, Kuczynski ET, Weierstll M (1998) polyurethane the material of choice for occupant protection and energy management. J Cell Plast 34(3):272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Li J, Zhen H, Fenglei Z, Huang Y (2012) Correlation between the acoustic and porous cell morphology of polyurethane foam: Effect of interconnected porosity. Mater Des 41:319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P, Cao ZB, Chen Y, Zhang XJ, Qian GR, Chu YL, Zhou M (2014) Glycolysis recycling of rigid waste polyurethane foam from refrigerators. Environ Technol 35(21):2676–2684

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Al-Refaie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Refaie, A., Aldwairi, R. & Chen, T. Optimizing performance of rigid polyurethane foam using FGP models. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 9, 351–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-016-0441-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-016-0441-9

Keywords

Navigation