Advertisement

Use of Coal Fly Ash or Glass Pozzolan Addition as a Mitigation Tool for Alkali-Silica Reactivity in Cement Mortars Amended with Recycled Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Bottom Ash

  • Matthew L. Schafer
  • Kyle A. Clavier
  • Timothy G. Townsend
  • Christopher C. Ferraro
  • Jerry M. Paris
  • Benjamin E. Watts
Original Paper
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

Municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash was evaluated for its alkali aggregate reactivity in cement mortars. Subsequently, two wastes were evaluated as supplementary cementitious materials for their efficacy in mitigating expansive alkali-silica reactions in cement mortars amended with bottom ash. Three bottom ashes were incorporated into mortar bars as 15, 30 and 50% replacements of non-reactive sand. Control MSWI amended mortars were compared to those containing coal fly ash and glass pozzolan (synthetic glass). Dimensional expansion of the mortars was measured over 14 days to quantify the extent to which the recycled coal fly ash and glass pozzolan mitigated the alkali reactivity of the ash-amended mortar specimens. Average expansions of the ash-amended mortars ranged from 0.10 to 0.40%, suggesting that ash components reacted expansively in an alkaline environment. Microscopic analysis was used to complement the data and confirm the presence of silica-rich gel within glass fragments of the ash, as well as cracking of the aggregates. Supplementary cementitious materials (class F coal fly ash, glass pozzolan) mitigated expansion of the mortars by 90% on average, likely through consumption of the alkalis in the paste pore water.

Keywords

Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) Bottom ash Alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR) Alkali–silica reaction (ASR) Durability Recycling Recycled glass Coal fly ash 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded through research grants with the Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County in Florida, USA and the Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. The authors would like to extend considerable appreciation to the Authority for supplying the bottom ashes used in the study, and for providing swift logistical support on matters concerning bottom ash staging and sampling. The authors also thank Argos Corporation for donating natural aggregates which were used to create the mortars in this study. A special thank you is extended to the following graduate and undergraduate researchers at the University of Florida for their assistance with the laboratory work which directly supported this research: Sara Fox, Taylor Humbarger, Danielle Kennedy, Jarrod Petrovitch, and Caitlin Tibbets.

References

  1. 1.
    Paris, J.M., Roessler, J.G., Ferraro, C.C., DeFord, H.D., Townsend, T.G.: A review of waste products utilized as supplements to Portland cement in concrete. J. Clean. Prod. (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.013 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batayneh, M., Marie, I., Asi, I.: Use of selected waste materials in concrete mixes. Waste Manag. 27, 1870–1876 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferraro, C.C., Power, J.P., Roessler, J.G., Paris, J.M., Townsend, T.G.: From trash to treasure. Concr. Int. 38, 46–51 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Forteza, R., Far, M., Seguí, C., Cerdá, V.: Characterization of bottom ash in municipal solid waste incinerators for its use in road base. Waste Manag. 24, 899–909 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2004.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abbà, A., Collivignarelli, M.C., Sorlini, S., Bruggi, M.: On the reliability of reusing bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration as aggregate in concrete. Compos. B 58, 502–509 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chimenos, J., Segarra, M., Fernández, M., Espiell, F.: Characterization of the bottom ash in municipal solid waste incinerator. J. Hazard. Mater. 64, 211–222 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00246-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valle-Zermeño, R.Del, Formosa, J., Chimenos, J.M., Martínez, M., Fernández, A.I.: Aggregate material formulated with MSWI bottom ash and APC fly ash for use as secondary building material. Waste Manag. 33, 621–627 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, J.-S., Chu, P.-Y., Chang, J.-E., Lu, H.-C., Wu, Z.-H., Lin, K.-Y.: Engineering and environmental characterization of municipal solid waste bottom ash as an aggregate substitute utilized for asphalt concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2n0, 432–439 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:6(432).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nie, Y.: Development and prospects of municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration in China. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2, 1–7 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-008-0028-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beylot, A., Villeneuve, J.: Environmental impacts of residual municipal solid waste incineration: a comparison of 110 French incinerators using a life cycle approach. Waste Manag. 33, 2781–2788 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Söderman, M.L.: Recovering energy from waste in Sweden—a systems engineering study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 38, 89–121 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00103-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farny, J.A., Kerkhoff, B.: Diagnosis and Control of Alkali-Aggregate Reactions in Concrete, pp. 1–24. Portland Cement Association, Skokie (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pera, J., Coutaz, L., Ambroise, J., Chababbet, M.: Use of incinerator bottom ash in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 27, 1–5 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(96)00193-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Müller, U., Rübner, K.: The microstructure of concrete made with municipal waste incinerator bottom ash as an aggregate component. Cem. Concr. Res. 36, 1434–1443 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van den Heede, P., Ringoot, N., Beirnaert, A., Van Brecht, A., Van den Brande, E., De Schutter, G., De Belie, N.: Sustainable high quality recycling of aggregates from waste-to-energy, treated in a wet bottom ash processing installation, for use in concrete products. Materials 9, 1–24 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9010009 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM C1260: Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method), West Conshohocken, PA, (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1520/C1260-14.2
  17. 17.
    ASTM C289: Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Aggregates (Chemical Method), West Conshohocken, PA (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1520/C0289-07.2
  18. 18.
    Spanish Norm UNE, UNE 146507-1. Testing of aggregates. Determination of the potential reactivity of aggregates (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hooton, R., Thomas, M., Innis, F.: Use of the accelerated mortar bar test for evaluating the efficacy of mineral admixtures for controlling expansion due to alkali-silica reaction. Cem. Concr. Aggreg. 21, 157 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1520/CCA10429J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Portland Cement Association: Evaluation of Alkali-Silica Reactivity (ASR) Mortar Bar Testing (ASTM C1260 and C1567) at 14 Days and 28 Days. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thomas, M.: The effect of supplementary cementing materials on alkali-silica reaction: a review. Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 1224–1231 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duchesne, J., Bérubé, M.-A.: Long-term effectiveness of supplementary cementing materials against alkali–silica reaction. Cem. Concr. Res. 31, 1057–1063 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00538-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chimenos, J., Fernández, A., Nadal, R., Espiell, F.: Short-term natural weathering of MSWI bottom ash. J. Hazard. Mater. 79, 287–299 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00270-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ASTM D75: Standard Practice for Sampling Aggregates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1520/D0075
  25. 25.
    ASTM C150: Standard Specification for Portland Cement, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASTM C618: Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-15 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ASTM C1567: Standard Test Method for Determining the Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Combinations of Cementitious Materials and Aggregate (Accelerated Mortar-Bar Method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1520/C1567-11.2
  28. 28.
    ASTM C305: Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goldstein, J., Newbury, D.E., Echlin, P., Joy, D.C., Romig, A.D. Jr., Lyman, C.E., Fiori, C., Lifshin, E.: Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis: A Text for Biologists, Materials Scientists, and Geologists. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rajabipour, F., Maraghechi, H., Fischer, G.: Investigating the alkali-silica reaction of recycled glass aggregates in concrete materials. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 22, 1201–1208 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyer, C.: The greening of the concrete industry. Cem. Concr. Compos. 31, 601–605 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krivenko, P.V., Ilyin, V.P., Zgardan, E.P.: Durability of slag alkaline concrete with aggregates susceptible to alkali-silica reaction. In: Proceedings Beijing International Symposium, Cement and Concrete, Beijing (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and EnvironmentUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and EnvironmentUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations