Performance comparison between recirculating loop buffer-based optical packet switch architectures

Abstract

Due to the high cabling complications and limited scalability, the Ethernet switching is not a well-suited technology for the next-generation data center systems (NGDCs). In designing of interconnects for NGDCs, the first step is to select an appropriate switching technology. The best solution to the problems faced by NGDCs is the use of optical switching technology in the core of data centers. In this paper, three recirculating loop buffer-based optical packet switches are discussed. The first two switch discussed in this paper were proposed in the recent past, and the third switch is proposed by the authors of this paper. In this paper, a performance comparison between the switches is performed by considering physical and network layer parameters. The obtained results presented in the paper show that the performance of our proposed switch is better in comparison with other switches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. 1.

    C Kachris, K Kanonakis and I Tomkos IEEE Commun. Mag.51 39 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cisco Global Cloud Forecast and Methodology, 20112016. CISCO SYSTEMS Inc. (San Jose: Cisco Systems) (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    J Bowers, E Burmeister Photonic and Switching IEEE International Conference p1 (2006).

  4. 4.

    E F Burmeister, D J Blumenthal and J E Bowers Opt. Switch. Netw.5 10 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    X Ye, Y Yin, S B Yoo, P Mejia, R Proiettiand, V Akella In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems p 24(2010).

  6. 6.

    D K Hunter et al. IEEE Commun. Mag.37 120 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    H Rastegarfar, A Leon-Garcia, S LaRochelle and L A Rusch J. Lightwave Technol. 31 432 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    R K Singh, R Srivastava and Y N Singh Optical and Quantum Electron39 15 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    . V Shukla andA Jain J. Eng. Res.6 122 (2018).

  10. 10.

    V Shukla, A Jain and R Srivastava Opt. Quantum Electron.48 48 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    V Shukla, A Jain and R Srivastava Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res.9 10035 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    R K Singh, R Srivastava and Y N Singh J. Opt. Netw.7 94 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    R V Caenegem et.al. J. Lightwave Technol.24 1638 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    V Shukla and R Srivastava Int. J. Recent Res. Aspects Special Issue: Proceeding of NCITCSE2015 p 47 (2015).

  15. 15.

    R Srivastava and Y N Singh J. Opt. Switch. Netw.7 75 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    C Y Tian, C Q Wu, Z Y Li and N Guo IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.20 578 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    V Shukla, A Jain and R Srivastava J. Eng. Sci. Technol.11 1705 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    N Verma, R Srivastava and Y N Singh International Conference on Optoelectronics and Fiber Optics & Photonics (Photonics 2002) p 181 (2002).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vaibhav Shukla.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shukla, V., Sonkar, R.K. & Srivastava, R. Performance comparison between recirculating loop buffer-based optical packet switch architectures. Indian J Phys 94, 1085–1096 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-019-01540-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • BER
  • OPS
  • AWG
  • WDM
  • Cost

PACS

  • 42.79. Sz
  • 42.81.–I
  • 42.81. Wg