Advertisement

MAPAN

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 227–231 | Cite as

Attenuation Scale Calibration of an Optical Time Domain Reflectometer Using an External Laser Source

  • Osama Terra
  • Hatem Hussein
Original Paper
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Optical time domain reflectometers (OTDRs) are widely used to measure the attenuation of optical fibers. Accurate measurement of the attenuation requires periodic calibration of OTDRs. In this paper, a system is proposed based on the external source method (ESM) to calibrate of the attenuation scale of an OTDR over a dynamic range of around 15 dB. The ESM method has several advantages over the widely-used standard reference fiber (SRF) since it is fast, can be automated and offers direct traceability to the SI units. In order to estimate the accuracy of the proposed setup, an OTDR has been calibrated using the SRF and the ESM methods. The calibration uncertainty of the ESM method is found to be 0.040 dB, which is similar to that of the SRF method which is found to be 0.038 dB.

Keywords

Optical time domain reflectometer Fiber attenuation measurement OTDR calibration External source method 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank the Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF) for supporting and funding this research under the umbrella of center of excellence projects-laboratory accreditation.

References

  1. [1]
    B. Danielson, Optical time-domain reflectometer specifications and performance testing, Appl. Opt., 24 (1985), 2313–2322.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    O. Terra, Distance scale calibration of optical time domain reflectometer using active intensity modulation, MAPAN, 6 (2014).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    O. Terra and H. Hussein, Accurate fiber length measurement using time-of-flight technique, J. Opt. Commun., 37 (2015), 187–191.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Robertsson, M. Zucco, L-S. Ma, O. Terra, F. Saraiva, S. Gentil, C. Chekirda, Yu Zakharenko, V. Fedorin and L. Mostert, Results from the CI-2004 campaign at the BIPM of the BIPM.L-K11 ongoing key comparison, Metrologia 42 (2005).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    O. Terra and H. Hussein, An ultra-stable optical frequency standard for telecommunication purposes based upon the 5S1/2 → 5D5/2 two-photon transition in Rubidium, Appl. Phys. B, 122 (2016), 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Medhat, M. Sobee, H. M. Hussein, and O. Terra, Distance measurement using frequency scanning interferometry with mode-hoped laser, Opt. Laser Technol., 80 (2016), 209–213.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    European Standard, Calibration of optical time-domain reflectometers (OTDR), EN 61746 (2005).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    W. Rutzen, W. Stöcklein, C. Unger, Calibration of optical time domain reflectometers, Opt. Commun., 127 (1996), 343–352.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Calibration of Optical Time-Domain Reflectometers (OTDR’s),TIA/EIA-455-266, Telecommunications Industry Association, Arlington, VA (2002).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    IEEE Standard on Transitions, Pulses, and Related Waveforms, IEEE Standard 181–2003, The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Piscataway, NJ, USA (2003).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    O.Celikel, M. Kücükoglu, M. Durak, and F. Samadov, Determination of attenuation coefficients of single mode optical fiber standards to be used in OTDR calibrations, Opt. Laser Technol. 37 (2005), 420–426.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    BIPM, IEC, ISO. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISBN 92-67-10188-9 (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Metrology Society of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Standards (NIS)GizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations