Advertisement

MAPAN

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 165–168 | Cite as

Study of Size Distribution in Nanostructured Se58Ge39Pb3 Glass Using Various Characterization Methods

Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The present paper aims at the study of size distribution of particles in nanostructured Se58Ge39Pb3 glass using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and UV–visible spectrophotometer. The thin film sample has been prepared using melt quenching technique and inert gas consolidation method. The particle size distribution obtained from XRD and UV–Vis spectrophotometer shows more uncertainty than the results obtained from TEM measurements. The absorption spectra recorded on UV–Vis spectrophotometer is employed to get band gap values corresponding to different size distribution in sample. Further, it is concluded that TEM is the best measurement technique for size distribution as it has less uncertainty in the obtained results.

Keywords

Se–Ge–Pb Glasses Nanostructured Size distribution Band gap 

Notes

Acknowledgements

First author Deepika is highly thankful to Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for financial support vide Reference no. SR/WOS-A/PM-1017/2014(G) under Women Scientist Scheme to carry out this work.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Rossetti, J.L. Ellison, J.M. Gibson and L.E. Brus, Size effects in the excited electronic states of small colloidal CdS crystallites, J. Chem. Phys., 80 (1984) 4464–4469.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    W. Sang, Y. Qian, J. Min, D. Li, L. Wang, W. Shi and Y. Liu, Microstructural and optical properties of ZnS:Cu nanocrystals prepared by an ion complex transformation method, Solid State Commun., 121 (2002) 475–478.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R.R. Prabhu and M. Abdul Khadar, Characterization of chemically synthesized CdS nanoparticles, Pramana, 65 (2005) 801–807.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S.B. Bhanu Prasanth and S. Asokan, Effect of antimony addition on the thermal and electrical-switching behavior of bulk Se–Te glasses, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 355 (2009) 164–168.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Deepika, H. Singh and N.S. Saxena, Electrical properties of Ge1Se2.5 and Ge0.6Se2.5Sn0.4 glasses, Mater. Res. Express, 4 (2017) 035203.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Basak and D. Kundu, Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in determination of lead in glass materials by a standard complexometric method, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 27(3) (2012) 175–182.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Deepika, H. Singh and N.S. Saxena, Stability and percolation threshold of Ge42−xPbxSe58 (9 ≤ x ≤ 20) glasses, Trans. Ind. Ceram. Soc., 75 (2016) 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Deepika and Hukum Singh, Role of Sb substitution on electrical properties of Se–Te Glasses, Indian J. Sci. Technol., 9(48) (2016) 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    A.A. Soliman, Thermal stability of Cu0.3(SSe20)0.7 chalcogenide glass by differential scanning calorimetry, Thermochim. Acta, 423 (2004) 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Vazquez, P.L. Lopez-Alemany, P. Villares and R. Jimenez-Garay, Evaluation of the glass forming ability of some alloys in the Sb–As–Se system by differential scanning calorimetry, J. Alloys Compd., 354 (2003) 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A.K. Pattanaik and A. Srinivasan, Electrical properties of amorphous Pb–Ge–Se thin films, J. Appl. Sci., 5 (2005) 1–4.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    N.B. Maharjan, D. Bhandari, N.S. Saxena, M.M.A. Imran and D.D. Paudyal, Differential scanning calorimetry studies of Se85Te15−xPbx (x = 4, 6, 8 and 10) glasses, Bull. Mater. Sci., 23 (2000) 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Deepika, N.S. Saxena, Thermodynamics of glass/crystal transformation in Se58Ge42−xPbx (9 ≤ x ≤ 20) glasses, J. Phys. Chem. B, 114 (2010) 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Deepika, P.K. Jain, K.S. Rathore and N.S. Saxena, Structural characterization and phase transformation kinetics of Se58Ge42−xPbx (x = 9, 12) chalcogenide glasses, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 355 (2009) 1274–1280.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    N. Tohge, Y. Yamamato, T. Minami and M. Tanaka, Preparation of n-type semiconducting Ge20Bi10Se70 glass, Appl. Phys. Lett., 34 (1979) 640–641.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Awasthi, B.-S. Wu, C.-N. Liu, C.-W. Chen, S.-N. Uang and C.-J. Tsai, The effect of nanoparticle morphology on the measurement accuracy of mobility particle sizers, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 28(3) (2013) 205–215.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Patsha, K.K. Madapu and S. Dhara, Raman spectral mapping of III–V nitride and graphene nanostructures, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 28(4) (2013) 279–283.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    V. Bonu and A. Das, Size distribution of SnO2 quantum dots studied by UV–visible, transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 28(4) (2013) 259–262.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    D. Patidar, K.S. Rathore, N.S. Saxena, K. Sharma and T.P. Sharma, Energy band gap studies of CdS nanomaterials, J. Nano Res., 3 (2008) 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    T.P Sharma, D. Patidar, N.S. Saxena, K.B. Sharma and T.P. Sharma, Measurement of structural and optical band gaps of Cd1−xZnxS (x = 4 and 6) nanomaterials, Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys., 44 (2006) 125–128.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. Nanda, S. Sapra and D.D. Sarma, Size-selected zinc sulfide nanocrystallites:  synthesis, structure, and optical studies, Chem. Mater., 12 (2000) 1018–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. Firdous, D. Singh, and M.M. Ahmed, Electrical and optical studies of pure and Ni-doped CdS quantum dots, Appl. Nanosci., 3 (2013) 13–18.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    P. Venkatesu, Doping effect of Mn on structural optical magnetic and electrical properties of CdS nanoparticles, IEEE Xplore conference proceedings of the international conference on advanced nanomaterials and emerging engineering and technologies (2013), pp. 260–263.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    J. Tauc, Amorphous and Liquid semiconductor, Plenum, New York (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    K. Tripathi, A.A. Bahishti, M.A.M. Khan, M. Husain and M. Zulfequar, Optical properties of selenium–tellurium nanostructured thin film grown by thermal evaporation, Phys. B, 404 (2009) 2134–2137.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    N. Salah, S.S. Habib and Z.H. Khan, Direct bandgap materials based on the thin films of SexTe100−x nanoparticles, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 7 (2012) 509–516.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    E.J. H. Lee, C. Riberieo, T.R. Giraldi, E. Longo and E.R. Leite, Photoluminescence in quantum-confined SnO2 nanocrystals: evidence of free exciton decay, Appl. Phys. Lett., 84 (2004) 1745–1747.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Metrology Society of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied SciencesThe NorthCap UniversityGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations