Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Machiavellianism, Influential Tactics and Well-being Among Indian College Students

  • Research in Progress
  • Published:
Psychological Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper aimed to explore Machiavellianism, soft and hard influential tactics and subjective as well as psychological well-being (PWB) among final-year students of professional courses from New Delhi, India. The relationship between Machs and well-being was explored directly as well as indirectly through soft and hard influential tactics. Mach IV was used to assess Machiavellianism. Influential tactics were assessed with the use of a scale, developed for the current research, which is based on Dubrin conceptualization. Life satisfaction was assessed with the help of Students Life Satisfaction Scale by Huebner, whereas the positive and negative affect were measured by PANAS. PWB was assessed by Ryff’s 18-item scale. All the tools had satisfactory reliability values. The average score of Mach showed average level of Machiavellianism among the participants who used both soft and hard tactics. There was positive correlation between Machiavellianism and positive affect, whereas negative correlations were reported with negative affect, life satisfaction and PWB. Both soft and hard tactics mediated the relationship between Machiavellianism and well-being. The study has contributed in the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the importance of hard influential tactics, the relationship with PWB and the indirect paths through which Machiavellianism influences well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghababaei, N., & Błachnio, A. (2015). Well-being and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 365–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar, S., & Mahmood, Z. (2009). A Tri-prong variable analysis of influence strategies. Journal of World Applied Sciences, 7, 1080–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, F., Amorim, I. S., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 758–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, J., Cooke, M., & Muncer, S. J. (2008). The relationship between empathy and Machiavellianism: An alternative to empathizing-systemizing theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1203–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, B., Yilmaz, R., & Yavas, S. (1996). Relating depressive symptoms to Machiavellianism in a Turkish sample. Psychological Reports, 78, 1011–1014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbuto, J. E., Scholl, R. W., Hickox, C. F., & Boulmetis, J. (2001). A field study of the relation between leaders’ anticipation of targets’ resistance and targets’ report of influence tactics used by leaders in dyadic relations. Psychological Reports, 88, 835–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, R. (2005). The impact of emotional intelligence on subjective well-being. Perspectives in Education, 23, 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., & Shapiro, D. L. (1992). Influence tactics in combination: The interactive effects of soft versus hard tactics and rational exchange. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1429–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgardner, S., & Crothers, M. (2009). Positive psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharti, A. (1985). The self in Hindu thought and action. In A. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self (pp. 185–230). New York: Tavistock Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunell, A. B., Gentry, W. A., Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Kuhnert, K. W., & DeMarree, K. G. (2008). Leader emergence: The case of the narcissistic leader. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1663–1676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, S. L., Douglas, C., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., & Frink, D. D. (2003). The effects-of positive affect and gender on the influence tactics—Job performance relationship. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190301000101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. (2010). Relations of Machiavellianism with emotional blackmail orientation of salespeople. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 294–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., Jing, Y., Hayes, A., & Lee, J. M. (2012). Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1033–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9367-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. K., & Scherling, S. A. (1997). Ethical reasoning and Machiavellianism among business students in Hong Kong. Teaching Business Ethics, 1, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970a). Studies in Machiavellianism. NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970b). How devious are you? Take the Machiavelli test to find out. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, D., & Stamp, C. (1995). Examining the relationship between Machiavellianism and paranoia. Psychological Reports, 76, 67–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Games Scam. (2010). Retrieved 25 August 2015, from http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/major-scam-hits-commonwealth-games/article542593.ece.

  • Corts, I. M., Jaca, L. M., & Díaz, F. J. M. (2009). Effectiveness of influence patterns. Psychology in Spain, 13, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahling, J. J., Kuyumcu, D., & Librizzi, E. H. (2014). Machiavellianism, unethical behavior, and well-being in organizational life. In R. A. Giacalone & M. D. Promislo (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: implications for individual well-being: Implications for individual well-being. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deluga, R. J. (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, D. S. (1995). Assessing Machiavellianism and morality-conscience guilt. Psychological Reports, 77, 1355–1359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DuBruin, A. J. (1991). Sex and gender differences in tactics of influence. Psychological Reports, 68, 635–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, V., Chan, S., & Shorter, G. W. (2014). The Dark Triad, happiness and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for Managers of using single influence tactics and combination of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/256490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T. (1977). Multidimensional scaling of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B., Samsom, D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 77–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gable, M., & Topol, M. (1988). Machiavellianism and the department store executive. Journal of Retailing, 64, 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grams, L. C., & Rogers, R. W. (1990). Power and personality: Effects of Machiavellianism, need for approval, and motivation on use of influence tactics. Journal of General Psychology, 117, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (2006). Evolution and personality: A new look at Machiavellianism. In D. Mroczek & T. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 147–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.

  • Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. School Psychology International, 12, 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyla, M. (2012). Machiavellianism, relationship satisfaction, and the use of influence tactics in a close relationship. 1st ed. [ebook] International Masaryk Conference, pp. 2764–2773. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Magdalena_Hyla/publication/275968630_Machiavellianism_relationship_satisfaction_and_the_use_of_influence_tactics_in_a_close_relationship/links/554cae160cf29752ee7f3540/Machiavellianism-relationship-satisfaction-and-the-use-of-influence-tactics-in-a-close-relationship.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2017.

  • Iverson, R. D., & Maguire, C. (2000). The relationship between job and life satisfaction: Evidence from a remote mining community. Human Relations, 53, 807–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Baughman, H. M., Carter, G. L., & Parker, P. (2015). Dorian Gray without his portrait: Psychological, social, and physical health costs associated with the DarkTriad. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond?: The dark triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The dark triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 449–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 249–267). Wiley-Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118001868.ch15.

  • Keyes, C. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.73.3.539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.2.95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khajeh, A., Baharloo, G., & Soliemani, F. (2014). The relationship between psychological well-being and empathy quotient. Management Science Letters, 4, 1211–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.65.4.440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klocke, U. (2009). ‘I am the best’: Effects of influence tactics and power bases on powerholders’ self-evaluation and target evaluation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209340414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K., & Beyerlein, M. (1991). Construction and validation of an instrument measuring ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 619–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., & Sirgy, M. J. (1999). The effects of cultural distance and ethnocentrism on international marketers’ quality-of-life orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzner, R. (2008). Bernie Madoff’s $50 Billion Ponzi Scheme. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/12/madoff-ponzi-hedge-pf-ii-in_rl_1212croesus_inl.html.

  • Liew, L. L. (2003). Downward influence tactics: The impact of positive/negative affect, leader-member exchange, and gender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Penang: University Science Malaysia.

  • Mandal, E. (2008). Miłość, władza i manipulacja w bliskich związkach. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoskey, J. W., Hicks, B., Betris, T., Szyarto, C., Worzel, W., Kelly, K., et al. (1999). Machiavellianism, adjustment, and ethics. Psychological Reports, 85, 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McHoskey, J. W. (2001). Machiavellianism and personality dysfunction. Personality and Individual Differences , 31, 791–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 523–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omar, F. (2001). Downward influence tactics, leader-member exchange, and job attitudes. Unpublished MBA thesis. Penang: University Science Malaysia.

  • Pandey, J., & Rastogi, R. (1979). Machiavellianism and ingratiation. Journal of Social Psychology, 108, 221–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, J., & Singh, P. (1986). Effects of Machiavellianism, other-enhancement, and power-position on affect, power feeling, and evaluation of the ingratiator. The Journal of Psychology, 121, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2002). Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior: Do bigger egos mean bigger problems? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilch, I., & Turska, E. (2014). Relationships between Machiavellianism, organizational culture, and workplace bullying: Emotional abuse from the target’s and the perpetrator’s perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, U., Shahnawaz, M., & Imran, M. (2017). Machiavellianism and task oriented leadership: Testing job autonomy as a trait activator. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Psychology), 32, 24–30. Retrieved from http://www.turkpsikolojidergisi.org/ojs-2.4.6/index.php/tpd/article/view/177.

  • Rode, J. C. (2004). Job satisfaction and life satisfaction revisited: A longitudinal test of an integrated model. Human Relations, 57, 1205–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704047143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological wellbeing revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satyam Scam Case. (2009). Retrieved 25 August 2015, from http://cbi.nic.in/fromarchives/satyam/satyam.php.

  • Sinha, J. B. P., & Kanungo, R. N. (1997). Context sensitivity and balancing in Indian organizational behaviour. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., & Keogh, E. (2000). Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 443–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. B. P., Singh, S., Gupta, P., Srivastava, K. B. L., Sinha, R. B. N., Srivastava, S., et al. (2010). An exploration of the Indian mindset. Psychological Studies, 55, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0001-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangelisti, A. L., Daly, J. A., & Rudnick, J. R. (1991). Making people feel guilty in conversations. Human Communication Research, 18, 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P., & Sussmann, M. (1991). Choice of influence tactics: Individual and organizational determinants. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030120107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, P. K. (2004). Being Indian: The truth about why the twenty-first century will be India’s. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wastell, C., & Booth, A. (2003). Machiavellianism: An alexithymic perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 730–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wertag, A., & Hanzec, I. (2013). Life satisfaction and gender differences in Dark Triad personality traits. Poster presentation at the NAUČNO-STRUČNI SKUP SAVREMENI TRENDOVI U PSIHOLOGIJI FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET, NOVI SAD.

  • Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 285–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winefield, H. R., Gill, T. K., Taylor, A. W., & Pilkington, R. M. (2012). Psychological well-being and psychological distress: Is it necessary to measure both? Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2211-1522-2-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. S. (2009). States-of-mind in psychopathology and psychological well-being. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9148-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Interpersonal trust and attitudes towards human· nature. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 373–412). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.75.2.132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajenkowski, M., & Czarna, A. Z. (2015). What makes narcissists unhappy? Subjectively assessed intelligence moderates the relationship between narcissism and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India

    Usama Rehman, Asma Nabi & M. G. Shahnawaz

Authors
  1. Usama Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asma Nabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. G. Shahnawaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usama Rehman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rehman, U., Nabi, A. & Shahnawaz, M.G. Machiavellianism, Influential Tactics and Well-being Among Indian College Students. Psychol Stud 63, 42–51 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0443-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0443-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation