Abstract
Pathomorphological alterations of chicken coccidiosis in Jammu division were undertaken in both organized and backyard chickens during the year 2010–2011. A total 240 intestines were examined from both organized farms and backyard chickens for histopathological studies. Out of 240 samples processed, 48 samples were found to be positive for coccidiosis with a prevalence of 20 %. Coccidiosis was initially diagnosed on the basis of faecal examination and confirmed by the presence of sporulated oocysts and pathomorphological alterations in intestines. Eimeria species were identified by morphometry. Five Eimeria species identified were Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix, E. maxima, E. acervulina and E. mitis. Histopathological lesions revealed loss of epithelial tissue, congestion of blood vessels which indicate disruption followed by haemorrhage, severe muscular oedema and necrosis of submucosa of intestine and caecum. There was loss of intestinal villi, disruption of caecal mucosa and clusters of oocysts seen. There was massive infiltration by heterophils and mononuclear cells. Several merozoites, schizonts and microgametes were found in the epithelial cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Awais MM, Akhtar M, Iqbal Z, Muhammad F, Anwar MI (2012) Seasonal prevalence of coccidiosis in industrial broiler chickens in Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. Trop Anim Health Prod 44(2):323–328. doi:10.1007/s11250-011-0024
Basic animal husbandry statistics (2010) Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, New Delhi
Bhatia BB, Pathak KML, Banerjee DP (2004) A text book of veterinary parasitology, 2nd edn. Kalyani, New Delhi, pp 337–343
Dalloul RA, Lillehoj HS (2006) Poultry coccidiosis. Recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development. Expert Revise Vaccines 5(3):143–162
Davis SFM (1963) Eimeria brunette and additional cause of intestinal coccidiosis in poultry domestic fowl. Brazilian Vet Rec 75:1–4
Fantham HB (1910) The morphology and life-history of Eimeria (coccidium) avium: a sporozoön causing a fatal disease among young grouse. Proceed Zoolo Socie of London 3:672–691
Fleck SL, Moody AH (1993) Diagnostic technique in medical parasitology, 11th Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 10–14
Hadipour MM, Olyaie A, Naderi M, Azad F, Nekouie O (2011) Prevalence of Eimeria species in scavenging native chickens of Shiraz Iran. African J Micro Res 5:3296–3299
Johnson WT (1930) A Study on Eimeria necatrix. Agricul Experi Station Tech Bull 538:30–33
Levine ND (1985) Veterinary Protozoology. Iowa State University Press, Ames, p 414
Lillehoj HS, Trout JM (1993) Coccidia: a review of recent advances on immunity and vaccine development. Avian Pathol 22:3–21
Lima JD (1979) Eimeria caprina sp. from the domestic goat (Capra hircus) from the United States of America. J Parasitol 65(6):902–903
Livestock census (2007) Ministry of Agriculture and Dairing, Government of India
Long PL, Tompkins RV, Millard BJ (1975) Coccodiosis in broilers: evaluation of infection by the examination of broiler house litter for oocysts. Avian Pathol 4(4):287–294
Luna LG (1968) Manual of histological staining methods of the armed registry of pathology.3rd edition. Mc Graw Hill, New York, P 36–95
Morris GM, Gasser RB (2006) Biotechnological advances in the diagnosis of avian coccidiosis and the analysis of genetic variation in Eimeria. Biotech Advan 24:590–603
Nematollahi A, Moghaddam GH, Pourabad RF (2009) Prevalence of Eimeria species among broiler chicks in Tabriz (Northwest of Iran). Mun Ent Zool 4:53–58
Nnadi PA, George SO (2010) A cross-sectional survey on parasites of chickens in selected villages in the subhumid zones of south-eastern Nigeria. J Parasitol Res 141:1–6
Osorio C, Clark S, Martin M, Barnes HJ (2010) Cytological diagnosis of coccidial infections in turkeys. Alpharma Anim Heal 33:3
Raillet F, Lucet M (1891) An account of coccidiosis in the domestic fowl. Vet Med 2:661–663
Rasheda M, Bano L (1985) Histopathology of coccidiosis by Eimeria garnhami in coturnix coturnix of N.W.F.P. Pak Vet J 1:27–29
Rehman TU, Khan MN, Sajid MS, Abbas RZ, Arshad M, Iqbal Z, Iqbal A (2010) Epidemiology of Eimeria and associated risk factors in cattle of district Toba Tek Singh, Pakistan. Parasitol Res 108:1171–1177
Shirzad MR, Seifi S, Gheisari HR, Hachesoo BA, Habibi H, Bujmehrani H (2011) Prevalence and risk factors for subclinical coccidiosis in broiler chicken farms in Mazandaran province, Iran. Trop Anim Health Prod 43:1601–1604
Smith MC, Sherman DM (1994) Goat medicine, 2nd Ed. Wiley–Blackwell, Philadelphia, pp 429–431
Sood S, Yadav A, Vohra S, Katoch R, Ahmad BD, Borkatari S (2009) Prevalence of coccidiosis in poultry birds in R.S.Pura region, Jammu. Vet Prac 10(1):69–70
Soomro NM, Rind R, Arijo AG, Soomro SA (2001) Clinical, gross and histopathological studies of coccidial infection in chicken. Intern J Agri and Biol 3(4):426–427
Soulsby EJL (1982) Helminths, arthropods & protozoa of domesticated animals, 8th edn. English Language Book Society and Baillere Tindal, London, p 809
Toulah FH (2007) Prevalence and comparative morphological studies of four Eimeria sp. of sheep in Jeddah area, Saudi Arabia. J Biol Sci 7:413–416
Tyzzer EE (1929) Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. Am J Hyg 10:269
Whitmarsh S (1997) Protozoan Poultry diseases. poultry science homepage, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Mississippi State University. http://www.misstate.edu/dept/poultry/disproto.htm
Williams RB (1999) A compartmentalised model for the estimation of the cost of coccidiosis to the world’s chicken production industry. Intern J of Parasitol 29:1209–1229
Acknowledgments
The authors thanks to the Dean, FVSc and A.H, R.S. Pura Jammu for providing necessary facilities at time of research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, S., Azmi, S., Iqbal, A. et al. Pathomorphological alterations associated with chicken coccidiosis in Jammu division of India. J Parasit Dis 39, 147–151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-013-0302-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-013-0302-9