Tweaking the Performance of Dopingless Nano-TFET with Misaligned Sandwiched Dual-Gate Structure


While scaling down the devices it is important not to compromise with the performance. Scaling of tunnel devices shows better performance than Field Effect Transistors (FETs). Charge Plasma based Dopingless Double Gate Tunnel Field Effect Transistor (DLDGTFET) with its various misaligned configurations are designed, discussed and analyzed in the presented work. Silicon is preferred as a choice of material. For various misalignment configurations, initially, bottom gate is shifted towards the right, then it is shifted towards left and at last bottom and top, both gates are misplaced for analyzing the device parameters, analog parameters and linearity parameters. By misalignment, it is observed that either the bottom gate is misaligned towards the right or left or both gates are being misaligned, device performance degraded. The basic structure shows the higher drain current, better drive current among other structures such as 15 μA. whereas source underlapped (SU100) structure shows the better subthreshold slope such as 20 mV/decade. But SU100 has the least amount of drive current. In the subthreshold region, BM100 has the maximum value of transconductance gain factor i.e. 104 V1. When the bottom gate is shifted towards right i.e. for drain overlapped structure it was observed that it shows better linearity parameters and can be considered for low noise and low voltage applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data Availability

Not Applicable.


  1. 1.

    Han K, Long S, Deng Z, Zhang Y, Li J (2020) A novel germanium-around-source gate-all-around tunnelling field-effect transistor for low-power applications. Micromachines 11(2):164.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Young KK (1989) Short-channel effect in fully depleted SOI MOSFETs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 36(2):399–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Huang X, Lee WC, Kuo C, Hisamoto D, Chang L, Kedzierski J, Anderson E, Takeuchi H, Choi YK, Asano K, Subramanian V (2001) Sub-50 nm P-channel FinFET. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 48(5):880–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yadav S, Sharma D, Chandan BV, Aslam M, Soni D, Sharma N (2018) A novel hetero-material gate-underlap electrically doped TFET for improving DC/RF and ambipolar behaviour. Superlattice Microst 117:9–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bangsaruntip S, Cohen GM, Majumdar A, Sleight JW (2010) Universality of short-channel effects in undoped-body silicon nanowire MOSFETs. IEEE Electron Device Lett 31(9):903–905.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Saurabh S, Kumar MJ Fundamental of tunnel field effect transistors

  7. 7.

    Boucart K, Ionescu AM (2007) Double-gate tunnel FET with high-k gate dielectric. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 54(7):1725–1733.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Musalgaonkar G, Sahay S, Saxena RS, Kumar MJ (2019) Nanotube Tunneling FET with a Core source for Ultrasteep subthreshold swing: a simulation study. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 66(10):4425–4432.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wu C, Huang Q, Zhao Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Huang R (2016) A novel tunnel FET design with stacked source configuration for average subthreshold swing reduction. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 63(12):5072–5076.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Beohar A, Vishvakarma SK (2016) Performance enhancement of asymmetrical underlap 3D-cylindrical GAA-TFET with low spacer width. Micro Nano Lett 11(8):443–445.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Singh S, Raman A, Kumar N (2017) Design and optimization analysis of dual material gate on DG-IMOS. J Semiconduct 38(12):124003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gopalakrishnan K, Griffin PB, Plummer JD (2004) Impact ionization MOS (I-MOS)-part I: device and circuit simulations. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 52(1):69–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Musalgaonkar G, Sahay S, Saxena RS, Kumar MJ (2018) An impact ionization MOSFET with reduced breakdown voltage based on back-gate misalignment. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 66(2):868–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Onal C, Woo R, Koh HYS, Griffin PB, Plummer JD (2008) A novel depletion-IMOS (DIMOS) device with improved reliability and reduced operating voltage. IEEE Electron Device lett 30(1):64–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yadav S, Sharma D, Soni D, Aslam M (2017) Controlling ambipolarity with improved RF performance by drain/gate work function engineering and using high k-dielectric material in electrically doped TFET: proposal and optimization. J Comput Electron 16(3):721–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ionescu AM, Riel H (2011) Tunnel field-effect transistors as energy-efficient electronic switches. Nature, 479(7373), pp.329-337.

  17. 17.

    Choi WY, Park BG, Lee JD, Liu TJK (2007) Tunneling field-effect transistors (TFETs) with subthreshold swing (SS) less than 60 mV/dec. IEEE Electron Device Lett 28(8):743–745.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kumar N, Raman A (2019) Design and investigation of charge-plasma-based work function engineered dual-metal-heterogeneous gate Si-Si 0.55 Ge 0.45 GAA-cylindrical NWTFET for ambipolar analysis. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 66(3):1468–1474.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Singh S, Raman A (2018) A dopingless gate-all-around (GAA) gate-stacked nanowire FET with reduced parametric fluctuation effects. J Comput Electron 17(3):967–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Damrongplasit N, Shin C, Kim SH, Vega RA, Liu TJK (2011) Study of random dopant fluctuation effects in germanium-source tunnel FETs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 58(10):3541–3548.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chiang MH, Lin JN, Kim K, Chuang CT (2007) Random dopant fluctuation in limited-width FinFET technologies. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 54(8):2055–2060.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jhaveri R, Nagavarapu V, Woo JC (2010) Effect of pocket doping and annealing schemes on the source-pocket tunnel field-effect transistor. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 58(1):80–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Damrongplasit N, Kim SH, Liu TJK (2013) Study of random dopant fluctuation induced variability in the raised-Ge-source TFET. IEEE electron Device Lett 34(2):184–186.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lahgere A, Sahu C, Singh J (2015) Electrically doped dynamically configurable field-effect transistor for low-power and high-performance applications. Electron Lett 51(16):1284–1286.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nigam K, Kondekar P, Sharma D (2016) DC characteristics and analog/RF performance of novel polarity control GaAs-Ge based tunnel field effect transistor. Superlattice Microst 92:224–231.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kumar M, Jit S (2015) Effects of electrostatically doped source/drain and ferroelectric gate oxide on subthreshold swing and impact ionization rate of strained-Si-on-insulator tunnel field-effect transistors. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol 14(4):597–599.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kumar N, Raman A (2019) Low voltage charge-plasma based dopingless tunnel field effect transistor: analysis and optimization. Microsystem Technol:1-8.

  28. 28.

    Anand S, Sarin RK (2018) Hetero-material gate doping-less tunnel FET and its misalignment effects on Analog/RF parameters. J Electron Mater 47(5):2988–2996.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ghosh B, Akram MW (2013) Junctionless tunnel field effect transistor. IEEE Electron Device Lett 34(5):584–586.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Amin SI, Sarin RK (2015) Analog performance investigation of misaligned double gate junctionless transistor. J Comput Electron 14(3):675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gundapaneni S, Bajaj M, Pandey RK, Murali KV, Ganguly S, Kottantharayil A (2012) Effect of band-to-band tunneling on junctionless transistors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 59(4):1023–1029.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Moselund KE, Schmid H, Bessire C, Bjork MT, Ghoneim H, Riel H (2012) InAs–Si nanowire heterojunction tunnel FETs. IEEE Electron Device Lett 33(10):1453–1455.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lee K, Lee J, Kim S, Park E, Lee R, Kim HM, Kim S, Park BG (2019) Tunnel field effect transistor with ferroelectric gate insulator. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 19(10):6095–6098.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kumar N, Mushtaq U, Amin SI, Anand S (2019) Design and performance analysis of dual-gate all around core-shell nanotube TFET. Superlattice Microst 125:356–364.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yin C, Chan PC (2004) Investigation of the source/drain asymmetric effects due to gate misalignment in planar double-gate MOSFETs. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 52(1):85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Anand S, Sarin RK (2017) Gate misalignment effects on analog/RF performance of charge plasma-based doping-less tunnel FET. Appl Phys A 123(6):413.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shekhar D, Raman A (2020) Design and analysis of dual-gate misalignment on the performance of dopingless tunnel field effect transistor. Appl Phys A 126:441.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Manual, ATLAS User’S (2010). Silvaco. Santa Clara, CA

  39. 39.

    Kim JH, Kim S, Park BG (2019) Double-gate TFET with vertical channel sandwiched by lightly doped Si. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 66(4):1656–1661.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kumar MJ, Janardhanan S (2013) Doping-less tunnel field effect transistor: design and investigation. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 60(10):3285–3290.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Luisier M, Klimeck G (2010) Simulation of nanowire tunneling transistors: from the Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin approximation to full-band phonon-assisted tunneling. J Appl Phys 107(8):084507.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kumar N, Raman A (2019) Performance assessment of the charge-plasma-based cylindrical GAA vertical nanowire TFET with impact of interface trap charges. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 66(10):4453–4460.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chandan BV, Dasari S, Yadav S, Sharma D (2018) Approach to suppress ambipolarity and improve RF and linearity performances on ED-tunnel FET. Micro Nano Lett 13(5):684–689.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Biswal SM, Baral B, De D, Sarkar A (2016) Study of effect of gate-length downscaling on the analog/RF performance and linearity investigation of InAs-based nanowire tunnel FET. Superlattice Microst 91:319–330.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gupta AK, Raman A, Kumar N (2019) Design and investigation of a novel charge plasma-based core-shell ring-TFET: analog and linearity analysis. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 66(8):3506–3512.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gupta AK, Raman A (2020) Electrostatic-doped nanotube TFET: proposal, design, and investigation with linearity analysis. Silicon.

Download references


The Author wishes to thanks Dr. Ashish Raman for his work in the field of semiconductor devices. We also thanks to the VLSI design Lab., Department of Electronics and communications, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar, 144011, India.


No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information




All the authors contributed to the study conception and design, literature review, material preparation, simulation, and analysis were performed by [Deep Shekhar] and [Dr. Ashish Raman]. The final draft of the manuscript was written by [Deep Shekhar] and all authors commented on the previous version of the manuscripts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deep Shekhar.

Ethics declarations

No funding was received for conducting this study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The authors report no conflicts of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Conflict of Interest

The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honour-aria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Consent to Participate

Authors voluntarily agreed to participate in the research.

Consent for Publication

The Author transfers to Springer the non-exclusive publication rights and he warrants that his contribution is original and that he has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of all co-authors. This transfer of publication rights covers the non-exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shekhar, D., Raman, A. Tweaking the Performance of Dopingless Nano-TFET with Misaligned Sandwiched Dual-Gate Structure. Silicon (2021).

Download citation


  • Tunnel field effect transistor
  • Non-local band to band Tunneling
  • Dopingless
  • Gate misalignment
  • ON current
  • Subthreshold slope