Tribo-Mechanical Behaviour of Ti-Based Particulate Reinforced As-Cast and Heat Treated A359 Composites

Abstract

This study investigates the tribo-mechanical behaviour of as-cast and heat treated A359/ 6 wt.% Ti-based particulate reinforced homogeneous composites (TiB2, TiO2, and TiC) processed through modified stir casting technique. Metallographical observation on as-cast homogeneous composites revealed a uniform distribution of reinforcements throughout the cross-section. In heat treated composites, the tribo-mechanical properties were enhanced by the formation of spheroidized alpha eutectic Si. TiB2 and TiO2 exhibited superior interfacial bonding with Al-matrix, whereas TiC showed marginal wetting. Linear reciprocating wear experiments were performed on all as-cast and heat treated components by varying loads (15–55 N) and sliding distances (500–2500 m). Results revealed superior hardness (182.5 HV), tensile strength (271.6 MPa) and wear resistance for heat treated A359/TiB2 composite than TiO2 and TiC reinforced composites. The wear rate and coefficient of friction was observed to be dependent on the applied load and type of reinforcement particle in the composites. Worn surfaces of composites exhibited severe delamination wear mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Sathyanarayana KG, Pillai RM, Pai BC, Kestursatya M, Rohatgi PK, Kim JK (2002) Developments in cast metal matrix composites over last three and half decades. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advances in Composites, Bangalore, 753–763

  2. 2.

    Dev S, Aherwar A, Patnaik A (2019) Material selection for automotive piston component using entropy-VIKOR method. Silicon:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00110-y

  3. 3.

    Razak SK, Aherwar A, Unune DR, Mia M, Pruncu CI (2019) Evaluation of copper-based alloy (C93200) composites reinforced with marble dust developed by stir casting under vacuum environment materials. Mater 12(10):1574

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sadeghi Ida Mary A, Wells SE (2018) Effect of particle shape and size distribution on the dissolution behavior of Al2Cu particles during homogenization in aluminum casting alloy Al-Si-Cu-Mg. J Mater Process Technol 231:232–240

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Akbari MK, Baharvandi HR, Shirvanimoghaddam K (2015) Tensile and fracture behavior of nano/micro TiB2 particle reinforced casting A356 aluminium alloy composites. Mater Des 66:150–161

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kennedy AR (2002) The microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Si-B4C metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 37:317–323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kennedy AR, Wyatt SM (2000) The effect of processing on the mechanical properties and interfacial strength of aluminium/TiC MMCs. Compos Sci Technol 60(2):307–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tyagi R (2005) Synthesis and tribological characterization of in situ cast Al–TiC composites. Wear 259:569–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Páramo V, Colás R, Velasco E, Valtierra S (2000) Spheroidization of the Al-Si eutectic in a cast aluminum alloy. J Mater Eng Perform 9:616–622

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Myriounis DP, Hasan ST, Matikas TE (2008) Heat treatment and interface effects on the mechanical behavior of SiC-particle reinforced aluminium matrix composites. J ASTM Int 5(7):1–10

  11. 11.

    Rong C, Iwabuchi A, Shimizu T (2000) The effect of a T6 heat treatment on the fretting wear of a SiC particle-reinforced A356 aluminum alloy matrix composite. Wear 238(2):110–119

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yanfeng H, Liu X, Bian X (2002) In situ TiB2 particulate reinforced near eutectic Al–Si alloy composites. Compos Part A 33(3):439–444

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lakshmipathy J, Kulendran B (2014) Reciprocating wear behavior of 7075Al/SiC in comparison with 6061Al/Al2O3 composites. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 46:137–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kumar S, Chakraborty M, Sarma VS, Murty BS (2008) Tensile and wear behaviour of in situ Al–7Si/TiB2 particulate composites. Wear 265:134–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ramesh CS, Khan AA, Ravikumar N, Savanprabhu P (2005) Prediction of wear coefficient of Al6061–TiO2 composites. Wear 259:602–608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Math RG and Reddy AC (2012) Inference of macro-particles on wear rate of AA6061/TiO2 metal matrix composites. 4th International Conference on Modern Materials and Manufacturing' held at Chennai, India. pp 329–333

  17. 17.

    Kestursatya M, Kim JK, Rohatgi PK (2001) Friction and wear behaviour of a centrifugally cast lead-free copper alloy containing graphite particles. Metall Mater Trans A 32:2115–2125

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Maruyama B (2007) Discontinuously reinforced aluminum: current status and future direction. Int J Miner Metall Mater 51:59–61

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dev S, Aherwar A, Patnaik A (2018) Preliminary evaluations on development of recycled porcelain reinforced LM-26/Al-Si10Cu3Mg1 alloy for piston materials. Silicon 11(3):1557–1573

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gopalakrishnan S, Murugan N (2012) Production and wear characterisation of AA 6061 matrix titanium carbide particulate reinforced composite by enhanced stir casting method. Compos Part B 43:302–308

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bi-Cheng Z, Shang S-L, Wang Y, Liu Z-K (2015) Data set for diffusion coefficients of alloying elements in dilute mg alloys from first-principles. Data Brief 5:900–912

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Radhika N (2018) Comparison of the mechanical and wear behaviour of aluminium alloy with homogeneous and functionally graded silicon nitride composites. Sci Eng Compos Mater 25:261–271

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Murty BS, Kori SA, Chakraborty M (2002) Grain refinement of aluminium and its alloys by heterogeneous nucleation and alloying. Int Mater Rev 47:3–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bi-Cheng Z, Shang S-L, Wang Y, Liu Z-K (2016) Diffusion coefficients of alloying elements in dilute Mg alloys: a comprehensive first-principles study. Acta Mater 103:573–586

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Aguilar EA, León CA, Contreras A, López VH, Drew RAL, Bedolla E (2002) Wettability and phase formation in TiC/Al-alloys assemblies. Compos Part A 33:1425–1428

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Beroual S, Boumerzoug Z, Paillard P, Borjon-Piron Y (2019) Effects of heat treatment and addition of small amounts of Cu and Mg on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Si-Cu and Al-Si-Mg cast alloys. J Alloys Compd 784:1026–1035

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Emma S, Seifeddine S (2011) Artificial ageing of Al-Si-Cu-Mg casting alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 528:7402–7409

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Das S, Mondal DP, Sawla S, Ramakrishnan N (2008) Synergic effect of reinforcement and heat treatment on the two body abrasive wear of an Al–Si alloy undervarying loads and abrasive sizes. Wear 264:47–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chawla N, Shen YL (2001) Mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Adv Eng Mater 3:357–370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ul HMI, Anand A (2018) Microhardness studies on stir cast AA7075-Si3N4 based composites. Mater Today Proc 9:19916–19922

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chawla KK, Metzger M (1972) Initial dislocation distributions in tungsten fibre-copper composites. J Mater Sci 7:34–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Siddiqui Rafiq A, Abdullah HA, Al-Belushi KR (2000) Influence of aging parameters on the mechanical properties of 6063 aluminium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 102:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ogris E (2002) Development of Al-Si-mg alloys for semi-solid processing and silicon spheroidization treatment (SST) for Al-Si-cast alloys (Doctoral dissertation, ETH Zurich)

  34. 34.

    Avner S (1974) Introduction to physical metallurgy. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2:481–497

  35. 35.

    Ibrahim MF, Samuel E, Samuel AM, Al-Ahmari AMA, Samuel FH (2011) Impact toughness and fractography of Al–Si–Cu–Mg base alloys. Mater Des 32:3900–3910

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mandal A, Chakraborty M, Murty BS (2007) Effect of TiB2 particles on sliding wear behaviour of Al–4Cu alloy. Wear 262:160–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kumar GV, Rao CSP, Selvaraj N (2011) Mechanical and tribological behavior of particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites–a review. J Miner Mater Charact Eng 10(01):59

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gomes JR, Ramalho A, Gaspar MC, Carvalho SF (2005) Reciprocating wear tests of Al–Si/SiCp composites: a study of the effect of stroke length. Wear 259:545–552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Toptan F, Kerti I, Rocha LA (2012) Reciprocal dry sliding wear behaviour of B4Cp reinforced aluminium alloy matrix composites. Wear 290:74–85

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zhao M, Wu G, Jiang L, Dou Z (2006) Friction and wear properties of TiB2p/Al composite. Compos Part A 37:1916–1921

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gómez de Salazar JM, Barrena MI (2004) Influence of heat treatments on the wear behaviour of an AA6092/SiC25p composite. Wear 256:286–293

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Archard J (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24:981–988

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Radhika N, Vaishnavi A, Chandran GK (2014) Optimisation of dry sliding wear process parameters for aluminium hybrid metal matrix composites. Tribol Ind 36:188–194

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ul HMI, Anand A (2018) Dry Sliding friction and wear behavior of AA7075-Si3N4 composite. Silicon 10:1819–1829

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Radhika N, Raghu R (2015) Evaluation of dry sliding wear characteristics of LM 13 Al/B4C composites. Tribology in Industry 37:20–28

  46. 46.

    Rajan HM, Ramabalan S, Dinaharan I, Vijay SJ (2014) Effect of TiB2 content and temperature on sliding wear behavior of AA7075/TiB2 in situ aluminum cast composites. Arch Civ Mech Eng 14:72–79

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Veeravalli RR, Nallu R, Mohiuddin SMM (2016) Mechanical and tribological properties of AA7075–TiC metal matrix composites under heat treated (T6) and cast conditions. J Mater Res Technol 5:377–383

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Deuis RL, Subramanian C (2000) Dry sliding wear behaviour at ambient and elevated temperatures of plasma transferred arc deposited aluminium composite coatings. Mater Sci Technol 16:209–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Vieira AC, Sequeira PD, Gomes JR, Rocha LA (2009) Dry sliding wear of Al alloy/SiCp functionally graded composites: influence of processing conditions. Wear 267:585–592

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are so thankful to AR&DB Organization for providing the financial support. [ARDB/01/2031877/M/1].

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Radhika.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radhika, N., Sasikumar, J. & Arulmozhivarman, J. Tribo-Mechanical Behaviour of Ti-Based Particulate Reinforced As-Cast and Heat Treated A359 Composites. Silicon 12, 2769–2782 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00370-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Homogeneous composites
  • Spheroidization
  • Heat treatment
  • Reciprocating wear
  • Delamination