, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 1903–1910 | Cite as

Effect of KH550 on the Preparation and Compatibility of Carbon Fibers Reinforced Silicone Rubber Composites

  • Weili Wu
  • Jun Wang
Original Paper


Silicone rubber has good heat resistance, but its mechanical properties are poor. To improve the mechanical properties of the silicone rubber, the carbon fiber / silicone rubber composites were prepared in this paper, in which the silicone rubber was used as the matrix, the high-performance carbon fiber (CF) treated with coupling agent is used as the reinforcement. The best composite formulation, the types and content of coupling agent are determined by testing mechanical properties of the composites. The morphology structures of the composites were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), the compatibility between carbon fiber and silicone rubber was studied by infrared spectrum analysis (IR), dynamic thermal mechanical analysis (DMA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results show that the best composite formulation is silicone rubber of 100 phr, carbon fiber of 12 phr, coupling agent KH550 of 2.5 phr. The best first curing conditions are at 175 C under 10 MPa for 30 min, the postcuring conditions are at 200 C for 2h. The compatibility between carbon fiber treated with KH550 and silicon rubber is the best by SEM, IR, DMA and XPS analysis, and confirm that the coupling agent KH550 plays a compatilizer role in the preparation process of the carbon fiber/silicone rubber composites.


Composites Silicone rubber Carbon fiber Preparation Compatibility 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shit SC, Shah P (2013) A review on silicone rubber. Natl Acad Sci Lett 36(4):355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agarwal G, Patnaik A, Sharma RK (2014) Thermo-mechanical properties and abrasive wear behavior of silicon carbide filled woven glass fiber. Silicon 6(3):155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zolotareva N, Semenov V (2015) Microchannel thermocured silicone rubber. Silicon 7(2):89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu J, Wu R, Huang S, Yang M, Liu Y, Liu Y, Jiang R, Zhu F, Ouyang G (2015) Polyelectrolyte microcapsules dispersed in silicone rubber for in vivo sampling in fish brains. Anal Chem 87(20):10593–10599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li P, Jiang S, Yu Y, Yang J, Yang Z (2015) Biomaterial characteristics and application of silicone rubber and PVA hydrogels mimicked in organ groups for prostate brachytherapy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 49:220–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anyszka R, Bieliński D, Pėdzich Z, Szumera M (2015) Influence of surface-modified montmorillonites on properties of silicone rubber-based ceramizable composites. J Therm Anal Calorim 119(1):111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu WL (2011) Dough-moulding compound beinforced methyl winyl silicone rubber with silica filler. Polym Polym Compos 19(8):677–680Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soegiarto SA, Handoyo N, Soetaredjo FE, Angkawijaya AE, Ju YH, Ismadji S (2015) Preparation of carbon fiber from water hyacinth liquid tar. Int J Ind Chem 6(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li LB (2016) Fatigue hysteresis of carbon fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites at room and elevated temperatures. Appl Compos Mater 23(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anand RS, Patra K, Steiner M (2014) Size effects in micro drilling of carbon fiber rubber reinforced plastic composite. Prod Engineer 8(3):301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xiao H, Lu Y, Zhao W, Qin X (2014) A comparison of the effect of hot stretching on microstructures and properties of polyacrylonitrile and rayon-based carbon fiber. J Mater Sci 49(14):5017–5029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan ZM, Adams DO, Anas S (2016) The influence of multiple nested layer waviness on the compression strength of double nested wave formations in a carbon fiber composite laminate. Mech Compos Mater 51(6):751–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pincheira G, Montalba C, Gacitua W, Montrieux HM, Lecomte-Beckers J, Meléndrez MF, Flores P (2016) Study of the effect of amino-functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes on dry sliding wear resistance properties of carbon fiber reinforced thermoset polymers. Polymer 73(1):1–15Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuan S, Zhang C, Amin M, Fan H, Liu M (2015) Development of a cutting force prediction model based on brittle fracture for carbon fiber reinforced polymers for rotary ultrasonic drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 81(5):1223–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deng C, Jiang J, Liu F, Fang LC, Wang J, Li DJ, Wu J (2015) Effects of electrophoretically deposited graphene oxide coatings on interfacial properties of carbon fiber composite. J Mater Sci 50(17):5886–5892CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringQiqihar UniversityQiqiharPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations