Axillary Primary and Breast Cancer Management

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Axillary primary breast cancer, also known as occult primary breast cancer, is a rare entity representing less than 1% of all breast cancers. The surgical management of the axilla in breast cancer has changed significantly, with implications for the management of axillary primary breast cancer. Much of the data is limited by era, small cohorts, or large retrospective database studies. The purpose of this review is to reinforce the diagnostic work up of occult breast cancer, review updated management strategies of the axilla and breast, and summarize changes and updates in practice management and outcomes.

Recent Findings

Pathologic confirmation of breast primary disease and MRI are critical for the diagnostic work up of axillary primary breast cancer. A recent axillary primary specific meta-analyses and several National Cancer Database studies (NCDB) have reinforced that mastectomy versus breast conservation with whole breast radiation has equivalent outcomes. Surgical axillary management is under evolution, with multiple large trials reporting the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to downstage the node-positive axilla and decrease the morbidity of axillary lymph node dissection by allowing accurate sentinel node biopsy. Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy is increasingly used, although no prospective data exists specifically in occult primary breast cancer.

Summary

Appropriate diagnostic work up includes MRI to identify possible primary breast lesions in all patients with metastatic axillary disease and negative exam, mammography, and ultrasound. Axillary primary breast cancer should be treated with contemporary management strategies as other anatomic stage II breast cancers. Appropriate management strategies based on recent trial data suggest the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to downstage the axilla and allow for less morbid axillary surgery. Outcomes are equivalent with mastectomy or whole breast radiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.

    Halsted WS. I. The results of radical operations for the cure of carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1907;46(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-190707000-00001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hessler LK, Molitoris JK, Rosenblatt PY, et al. Factors Influencing management and outcome in patients with occult breast cancer with axillary lymph node involvement: analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10). https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-017-5928-X.

  3. 3.

    Walker GV, Smith GL, Perkins GH, Oh JL, Woodward W, Yu TK, et al. Population-based analysis of occult primary breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis. Cancer. 2010;116(17):4000–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Foroudi F, Tiver KW. Occult breast carcinoma presenting as axillary metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00542-8.

  5. 5.

    Owen HW, Dockerty MB, Gray HK. Occult carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954;98(3) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13146478/?from_term=owen+occult+carcinoma+of+the+breast&from_pos=1. Accessed April 27, 2020.

  6. 6.

    Pilewskie M, Morrow M. Applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014;23(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOC.2014.03.001.

  7. 7.

    Hainsworth JD, Greco FA. Management of patients with cancer of unknown primary site. Oncology (Williston Park). 2000;14(4) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10826316/?from_term=hainsworth+poorly+differentiated+carcinoma+of+unknown+primary+site&from_pos=9. Accessed April 27, 2020.

  8. 8.

    Copeland EM, McBride CM. Axillary metastases from unknown primary sites. Ann Surg. 1973;178(1):21–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197307000-00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gupta RK, Naran S, Lallu S, Fauck R. Diagnostic value of needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of palpable axillary lymph nodes. a study of 336 cases. Acta Cytol. 2003;47(4). https://doi.org/10.1159/000326567.

  10. 10.

    Blanchard DK, Farley DR. Retrospective study of women presenting with axillary metastases from occult breast carcinoma. World J Surg. 2004;28(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00268-004-7290-Y.

  11. 11.

    Hainsworth JD, Lennington WJ, Greco FA. Overexpression of Her-2 in patients with poorly differentiated carcinoma or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(3). https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.632.

  12. 12.

    Armstrong DK, Plaxe SC, Alvarez RD, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Barroilhet L, et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2018 Ovarian Cancer Continue. 2019. www.nccn.org/patients. Accessed March 31, 2020.

  13. 13.

    de Bresser J, de Vos B, van der Ent F, Hulsewé K. Breast MRI in clinically and mammographically occult breast cancer presenting with an axillary metastasis: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJSO.2009.09.007.

  14. 14.

    Bedrosian I, Schlencker J, Spitz FR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557268.

  15. 15.

    Merson M, Andreola S, Galimberti V, Bufalino R, Marchini S, Veronesi U. Breast carcinoma presenting as axillary metastases without evidence of a primary tumor. Cancer. 1992;70(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19920715)70:2<504::AID-CNCR2820700221>3.0.CO;2-T.

  16. 16.

    Rosen PP, Kimmel M. Occult breast carcinoma presenting with axillary lymph node metastases: a follow-up study of 48 patients. Hum Pathol. 1990;21(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(90)90008-S.

  17. 17.

    Mclaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT, et al. Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(32). https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3725.

  18. 18.

    Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, Fleige B, Hausschild M, Helms G, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(7):609–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70166-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    • Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, Holloway CMB, Gaboury L, Sideris L, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(3):258–63. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7827This study is a prospective trial to investigate the identification rate and false negative rate of sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

  20. 20.

    • Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, Ahrendt GM, Wilke LG, Taback B, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1071 Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013;310(14):1455–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.278932.SentinelThis study is a prospective trial to investigate the identification rate and false negative rate of sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

  21. 21.

    • Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, Mittendorf EA, Black DM, Gilcrease MZ, et al. Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patientswith node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1072–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0094This study is a prospective trial to investigate the identification rate and false negative rate of targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Le-Petross HT, et al. Identification and resection of clipped node decreases the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node surgery in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg. 2016;263(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001375.

  23. 23.

    Golshan M, Cirrincione CT, Sikov WM, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant therapy on eligibility for and frequency of breast conservation in stage II–III HER2-positive breast cancer: surgical results of CALGB 40601 (Alliance). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160(2):297–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4006-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    •• Cohen BL, Collier AL, Kelly KN, Goel N, Kesmodel SB, Yakoub D, et al. Surgical management of the axilla in patients with occult breast cancer (CT0 N+) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-020-08227-WThis study utilized the NCDB to investigate use of neoadjuvant therapy and survival in patients with occult primary breast cancer.

  25. 25.

    von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA1814017.

  26. 26.

    Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for brEAST cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(22). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA1612645.

  27. 27.

    Pilewskie M, Zabor EC, Mamtani A, Barrio AV, Stempel M, Morrow M. The optimal treatment plan to avoid axillary lymph node dissection in early-stage breast cancer patients differs by surgical strategy and tumor subtype. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(12):3527–33. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6016-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Macedo FI, Eid JJ, Flynn J, Jacobs MJ, Mittal VK. Optimal surgical management for occult breast carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(6). https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-016-5104-8.

  29. 29.

    He M, Tang LC, Yu KD, et al. Treatment outcomes and unfavorable prognostic factors in patients with occult breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJSO.2012.08.022.

  30. 30.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1). https://doi.org/10.3322/CAAC.21387.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Christian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christian, N., Ahrendt, G. Axillary Primary and Breast Cancer Management. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 13, 42–48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-020-00400-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Occult primary breast cancer
  • Axillary primary breast cancer
  • Axillary management
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • MRI
  • Cancer of unknown primary