Latent profiles of macronutrient density and their association with mobility limitations in an observational longitudinal study of older U.S. adults
- 38 Downloads
Our first objective was to estimate empirically-derived subgroups (latent profiles) of observed carbohydrate, protein, and fat intake density in a nationally representative sample of older U.S. adults. Our second objective was to determine whether membership in these groups was associated with levels of, and short term change in, physical mobility limitations.
Design and Setting
Measures of macronutrient density were taken from the 2013 Health Care and Nutrition Study, an off-year supplement to the Health and Retirement Study, which provided indicators of physical mobility limitations and sociodemographic and health-related covariates.
3,914 community-dwelling adults age 65 years and older.
Percent of daily calories from carbohydrate, protein, and fat were calculated based on responses to a modified Harvard food frequency questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was used to describe unobserved heterogeneity in measures of carbohydrate, protein, and fat density. Mobility limitation counts were based on responses to 11 items indicating physical limitations. Poisson regression models with autoregressive controls were used to identify associations between macronutrient density profile membership and mobility limitations. Sociodemographic and health-related covariates were included in all Poisson regression models.
Four latent subgroups of macronutrient density were identified: “High Carbohydrate”, “Moderate with Fat”, “Moderate”, and “Low Carbohydrate/High Fat”. Older adults with the lowest percentage of daily calories coming from carbohydrate and the greatest percentage coming from fat (“Low Carbohydrate/High Fat”) were found to have greater reported mobility limitations in 2014 than those identified as having moderate macronutrient density, and more rapid two-year increases in mobility limitations than those identified as “Moderate with Fat” or “Moderate”.
Older adults identified as having the lowest carbohydrate and highest fat energy density were more likely to report a greater number of mobility limitations and experience greater increases in these limitations than those identified as having moderate macronutrient density. These results suggest that the interrelation of macronutrients must be considered by those seeking to reduce functional limitations among older adults through dietary interventions.
Key wordsMacronutrient density mobility limitations latent profile analysis Health Care and Nutrition Study (HCNS) Health and Retirement Study (HRS)
- 11.Mulla UZ, Cooper R, Mishra GD, Kuh D, Stephen AM. Adult macronutrient intake and physical capability in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;42:81–87. doi:10.1093/ageing/afs101Google Scholar
- 15.Weir DR, Langa KM, Ofstedal MB, Hurd MD, Sharon R, Kardia LR, et al (n.d.) Health and Retirement Study Institutional Review Board Information. http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/irb/HRS_IRB_Information.pdf Accessed 01 September 2017Google Scholar
- 16.Chien S, Campbell N, Chan C, et al. 2015. RAND HRS Data Documentation, Version P. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Center for the Study of Aging. http://hrsonline. isr.umich.edu/modules/meta/rand/randhrsp/randhrs_P.pdf Accessed 01 September 2017Google Scholar
- 17.Nagi SZ. Disability and rehabilitation: legal, clinical, and self-concepts and measurement. Oxford: Ohio State U. Press, 1969.Google Scholar
- 19.Fonda S, Herzog AR, 2004. Documentation of physical functioning measured in the Health and Retirement Study and the Asset and Health Dynamics among the Oldest Old Study. HRS/AHEAD Doc Reports. https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/dr-008.pdf Accessed 01 September 2017Google Scholar
- 22.McLachlan G, Peel D. Finite mixture models. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.Google Scholar
- 25.Muthén LK, Muthén BO, 1998-2017. Mplus user’s guide, eighth ed. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
- 26.SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 14.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2015.Google Scholar
- 27.Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press 2005. doi:10.17226/10490.Google Scholar
- 29.Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied multiple correlation/regression analysis for the behavioral sciences, third ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.Google Scholar
- 33.Granic A, Jagger C, Davies K, et al. Effect of dietary patterns on muscle strength and physical performance in the very old: findings from the Newcastle 85+ Study. PLoS One 2016;11:1–18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149699Google Scholar
- 36.Semba RD, Varadhan R, Bartali B, Ferrucci L, Ricks MO, Blaum C, Fried LP. Low serum carotenoids and development of severe walking disability among older women living in the community: the Women’s Health and Aging Study I. Age Ageing 2007;36:62–67. doi:10.1093/ageing/afl122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar