Abstract
Importance
Muscle weakness is an important indicator of disability, chronic disease and mortality. While we recently proposed sex/race specific grip strength cutpoints for clinical muscle weakness in a diverse, nationally representative sample of older Americans, the extent to which these cutpoints predict physical disability remains unknown.
Objective
To examine whether sex/race specific muscle weakness cutpoints predict physical disability status in a nationally representative sample of Americans age 65+.
Design
We used data from the 2006-2010 Health and Retirement Study. Fully-adjusted, weighted multinomial logistic regression models were used to quantify the odds of experiencing the onset, progression or persistence of disability in activities of daily living (ADL) among weak versus non-weak individuals over a 2-year period.
Setting
General community, nationally representative sample of older Americans.
Participants
Population-based, community dwelling sample of older American adults aged 65-years+; 57 percent were women, 91% were White and the mean age was 75 years.
Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)
The primary outcome of interest was disability dynamics, defined by changes in ADL status across at 2- year period. The primary exposure was clinical muscle weakness as defined by previously identified cutpoints. Hypotheses were formulated before analyses were conducted.
Results
In this nationally representative sample (n= 8,725), 44% of individuals were classified as weak at baseline. At follow-up, 55% remained independent with no change in their ADL status, 11% had an onset of disability and 4% progressed in their disability status. The odds of experiencing an onset of ADL disability was 54% higher among weak individuals compared those who were not weak at baseline (OR= 1.54, 95% CI= 1.54, 1.5, p<.0001); the odds of experiencing a progression in physical disability status was 2.16 times higher among those who were weak at baseline compared to non-weak individuals (OR= 2.16, 95% CI= 2.15, 2.16, p<.0001).
Conclusions
This is the first study to use grip strength weakness cut-points to identify those who may be at greatest risk for experiencing physical disability in later life. Results underscore the importance of using population-specific cutpoints for clinical weakness in order to identify individuals at greatest risk for adverse health outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010;39(4):412–423. doi:10.1093/ageing/afq034.
Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, et al. Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(4):249–256. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003.
Sallinen J, Stenholm S, Rantanen T, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Koskinen S. Hand-grip strength cut points to screen older persons at risk for mobility limitation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(9):1721–1726. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03035.x.
Hicks GE, Shardell M, Alley DE, et al. Absolute strength and loss of strength as predictors of mobility decline in older adults: the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67(1):66–73. doi:10.1093/gerona/glr055.
Rantanen T. Midlife Hand Grip Strength as a Predictor of Old Age Disability. JAMA. 1999;281(6):558. doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.558.
Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):266–273. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6.
Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R. Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341(sep09_1):c4467. doi:10.1136/bmj.c4467.
Wind AE, Takken T, Helders PJM, Engelbert RHH. Is grip strength a predictor for total muscle strength in healthy children, adolescents, and young adults? Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(3):281–287. doi:10.1007/s00431-009-1010-4.
Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, et al. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95(5). http://jap.physiology.org/content/95/5/1851.short. Accessed May 31, 2017.
Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386(9990):266–273. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6.
Giampaoli S, Ferrucci L, Cecchi F. Hand-grip strength predicts incident disability in non-disabled older men.
Snih S Al, Markides KS, Ottenbacher KJ, Raji MA. Hand grip strength and incident ADL disability in elderly Mexican Americans over a seven-year period. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(6):481–486. doi:10.1007/BF03327406.
Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Foley D, et al. Midlife Hand Grip Strength as a Predictor of Old Age Disability. JAMA. 1999;281(6):558. doi:10.1001/jama.281.6.558.
Batsis JA, Germain CM, Vásquez E, Bartels SJ. Prevalence of weakness and its relationship with limitations based on the Foundations for the National Institutes for Health project: data from the Health and Retirement Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2016.90.
Rantanen T. Muscle strength, disability and mortality. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2003;13(1):3–8. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00298.x.
Peterson MD, Zhang P, Choksi P, Markides KS, Al Snih S. Muscle Weakness Thresholds for Prediction of Diabetes in Adults. Sports Med. 2016. doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0463-z.
Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C. Weakness and Low Lean Mass in Women With Hip Fracture: Prevalence According to the FNIH Criteria and Association With the Short-Term Functional Recovery. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015. doi:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000075.
Alley DE, Shardell MD, Peters KW, et al. Grip strength cutpoints for the identification of clinically relevant weakness. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(5):559–566. doi:10.1093/gerona/glu011.
Duchowny K, Peterson MD, Clarke P. Cutpoints for Clinical Muscle Weakness Among Older Americans. Am J Prev Med. 2016;In Press.
Clark BC, Manini TM. What is dynapenia? Nutrition. 2012;28(5):495–503. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2011.12.002.
Yang M, Jiang J, Hao Q, Luo L, Dong B. Dynapenic obesity and lower extremity function in elderly adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(1):31–36. doi:10.1016/j. jamda.2014.06.019.
Yang M, Ding X, Luo L, Hao Q, Dong B. Disability Associated With Obesity, Dynapenia and Dynapenic-Obesity in Chinese Older Adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):150.e11–150.e16. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.10.009.
Rossi AP, Fantin F, Caliari C, et al. Dynapenic abdominal obesity as predictor of mortality and disability worsening in older adults: A 10-year prospective study. Clin Nutr. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2015.02.005.
Batsis JA, Mackenzie TA, Barre LK, Lopez-Jimenez F, Bartels SJ. Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and mortality in older adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(9):1001–1007. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2014.117.
da Silva Alexandre T, De Oliveira Duarte YA, Ferreira Santos JL, Wong R, Lebrão ML. Sarcopenia according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in older people (EWGSOP) versus dynapenia as a risk factor for disability in the elderly. J Nutr Heal aging. 2014;18(5):547–553. doi:10.1007/s12603-014-0465-9.
Growing Older in America: The Health and Retirement Study. http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=dbook. Accessed December 15, 2015.
Crimmins EM, Guyer H, Langa KM, Ofstedal MB, Wallace RB, Weir DR. Documentation of Physical Measures, Anthropometrics and Blood Pressure in the Health and Retirement Study. Hrs. 2008;(February).
“An aging nation: the older population in the United States.” Washington, DC: US Census Bureau (2014): 25-1140. https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf. Accessed December 7, 2015.
SAS Institute I. SAS® 9.3. 2011.
Baumgartner R. Epidemiology of Sarcopenia among the Elderly in New Mexico. file:///Users/kateduchowny/Downloads/0912f505b91ff4e34a000000 (1).pdf. Accessed April 4,2015.
Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Simonsick E, Salive ME, Corti C, Langlois J. Progressive versus catastrophic disability: a longitudinal view of the disablement process. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996;51(3):M123–30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8630705. Accessed July 29, 2016.
Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Buchner D, et al. Departures from linearity in the relationship between measures of muscular strength and physical performance of the lower extremities: the Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997;52(5):M275–85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9310081. Accessed December 15, 2015.
Latham K. Nursing Home Stays and the Pace of Severe Disability Onset. Res Aging. 2011;33(6):637–660. doi:10.1177/0164027511403160.
Batsis JA, Zbehlik AJ, Pidgeon D, Bartels SJ. Dynapenic obesity and the effect on longterm physical function and quality of life: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15(1):118. doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0118-9.
Clarke P, Latham K. Life course health and socioeconomic profiles of Americans aging with disability. Disabil Health J. 2014;7(1 Suppl):S15–23. doi:10.1016/j. dhjo.2013.08.008.
Verbrugge LM, Reoma JM, Gruber-Baldini AL. Short-Term Dynamics of Disability and Well-Being. J Health Soc Behav. 1994;35(2):97. doi:10.2307/2137359.
Gill T, Allore Ã, Hardy Ã. The Dynamic Nature of Mobility Disabilityin. Older Persons. 2006:248–254. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00586.x.
Germain CM, Vasquez E, Batsis JA, Mcquoid DR. Sex, race and age differences in muscle strength and limitations in community dwelling older adults: Data from the Health and Retirement Survey (HRS). 2016. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2016.03.007.
Onder G, Penninx BWJH, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, Pahor M. Measures of physical performance and risk for progressive and catastrophic disability: results from the Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(1):74–79. doi:10.1093/gerona/60.1.74.
Femia EE, Zarit SH, Johansson B. Predicting change in activities of daily living: a longitudinal study of the oldest old in Sweden. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997;52(6):P294–302. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9403518. Accessed July 26, 2016.
Murtagh KN, Hubert HB. Gender differences in physical disability among an elderly cohort. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(8):1406–1411. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.8.1406.
Tseng LA, Delmonico MJ, Visser M, et al. Body Composition Explains Sex Differential in Physical Performance Among Older Adults. Journals Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(1):93–100. doi:10.1093/gerona/glt027.
Latham K, Clarke PJ. The Role of Neighborhood Safety in Recovery from Mobility Limitations: Findings from a National Sample of Older Americans (1996-2008). Res Aging. 2013;35(4):481–502. doi:10.1177/0164027512454887.
Latham K. Progressive and Accelerated Disability Onset by Race/Ethnicity and Education among Late Midlife and Older Adults. J Aging Health. 2012;24(8):1320–1345. doi:10.1177/0898264312459345.
Williams JS, Egede LE. The Association Between Multimorbidity and Quality of Life, Health Status and Functional Disability. Am J Med Sci. 2016;352(1):45–52. doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2016.03.004.
Freedman VA, Spillman BC, Andreski PM, et al. Trends in Late-Life Activity Limitations in the United States: An Update From Five National Surveys. Demography. 2013;50(2):661–671. doi:10.1007/s13524-012-0167-z.
Bassey EJ. Measurement of muscle strength and power. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20(S5):44–46. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(1997)5+<44::AIDMUS11>3.0.CO;2-Z.
Bohannon RW. Muscle strength: clinical and prognostic value of hand-grip dynamometry. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015;18(5):465–470. doi:10.1097/MCO.0000000000000202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duchowny, K.A., Clarke, P.J. & Peterson, M.D. Muscle Weakness and Physical Disability in Older Americans: Longitudinal Findings from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study. J Nutr Health Aging 22, 501–507 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0951-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0951-y