Advertisement

The journal of nutrition, health & aging

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 332–338 | Cite as

Agreement between different versions of MNA

  • Lorenzo M. DoniniEmail author
  • E. Poggiogalle
  • A. Morrone
  • P. Scardella
  • L. Piombo
  • B. Neri
  • E. Cava
  • D. Cucinotta
  • M. Barbagallo
  • A. Pinto
Article

Abstract

Abstract

Malnutrition occurs frequently in the elderly with important clinical and functional consequences. Moreover, the treatment of malnutrition in the elderly may be effective if clinical and nutritional interventions are performed in the early stages. Therefore the early identification of the risk of malnutrition using validated and handy tools plays a pivotal role in terms of clinical outcome. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) was validated for this purpose since many years but it is still ongoing the debate over whether the use of different items in certain clinical conditions can be effective without affecting the validity of the nutritional status evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between different versions of MNA in the evaluation of nutritional risk in elderly subjects.

Methods

522 subjects, 345 women and 177 men, were recruited from nursing homes or were free living in three different regions in Italy. All subjects underwent a multidimensional geriatric evaluation, addressed especially to nutritional status. We compared three different versions of MNA: the “original” version; a “proportional” MNA (MNA-P) in which the total MNA score was replaced by the ratio between the maximum score that each subject could obtain without including the body mass index (BMI) and the total original MNA score; and a third version in which calf circumference (CC) and mid-upper arm circumference (MAC) were used instead of BMI.

Results

According to the original MNA, a high prevalence of malnutrition was found out in both genders (26% of women and 16.3% of men); both the versions of MNA, in which BMI was not considered, showed a good predictive value compared to original MNA. In particular, the MNA-P. showed an overall efficiency equal to 89,1% with specificity and positive predictive value respectively equal to 97.5% and 95.2%. MNA-CC-MAC showed even better results in terms of overall efficiency (91.4%), sensitivity (81.1%), specificity (97.1%), positive and negative predictive values (94.2% and 94.4%, respectively).

Conclusion

The different versions of MNA gave similar results in the classifications of subjects and in comparison with nutritional and biochemical parameters. Moreover MNA versions that did not considered BMI seem to be more effective in singling out subjects with risk factors related to malnutrition (disability, reduced strength and calf circumference, anaemia).

Key words

MNA malnutrition elderly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lara-Pulido A, Guevara-Cruz M.: Malnutrition and associated factors in elderly hospitalized. Nutr Hosp. 2012 Apr;27(2):652–655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shum NC, Hui WW, Chu FC, Chai J, Chow TW.: Prevalence of malnutrition and risk factors in geriatric patients of a convalescent and rehabilitation hospital. Hong Kong Med J. 2005 Aug;11(4):234–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johansson Y, Bachrach-Lindstrom M, Carstensen J, Ek AC: Malnutrition in a home-living older population: prevalence, incidence and risk factors. A prospective study. J Clin Nurs. 2009 May; 18(9): 1354–1364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morley JE.: Undernutrition in older adults. Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29Suppl 1: i89–i93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M.: Disease related malnutrition: an evidence based approach to Treatment. Wallingford, Oxon.: CABI Publishing. 2003. Pp. 824Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lattanzio F, Laino I, Pedone C, Corica F, Maltese G, Salerno G, Garasto S, Corsonello A, Incalzi RA; PharmacosurVeillance in the elderly Care (PVC) Study Group:Geriatric conditions and adverse drug reactions in elderly hospitalized patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Feb;13(2):96–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsutsumi R, Tsutsumi YM, Horikawa YT, Takehisa Y, Hosaka T, Harada N, Sakai T, Nakaya Y: Decline in anthropometric evaluation predicts a poor prognosis in geriatric patients. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2012;21(1):44–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buurman BM, Hoogerduijn JG, de Haan RJ, Abu-Hanna A, Lagaay AM, Verhaar HJ, Schuunnans MJ, Levi M, de Rooij SE.: Geriatric conditions in acutely hospitalized older patients: prevalence and one-year survival and functional decline. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donini LM, De Felice MR, Savina C, Coletti C, Paolini M, Laviano A, Scavone L, Neri B, Cannella C: Predicting the outcome of long-term care by clinical and functional indices: the role of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011 Aug;15(7):586–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kagansky N, Bemer Y, Koren-Morag N, Perelman L, Knobler H, Levy S.: Poor nutritional habits are predictors of poor outcome in very old hospitalized patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Oct;82(4):784–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Rämsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, Thomas DR, Anthony PS, Charlton KE, Maggio M, Tsai AC, Vellas B, Sieber CC; Mini Nutritional Assessment International Group: Frequency of malnutrition in older adults: a multinational perspective using the mini nutritional assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Sep;58(9):1734–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bauer JM, Kaiser MJ, Anthony P, Guigoz Y, Sieber CC: The Mini Nutritional Assessment-its history, today’s practice, and future perspectives. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008 Aug–Sep;23(4):388–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donini LM, P. Scardella, L. Piombo, B. Neri, Asprino R, A.R. Proietti, S Carcaterra, E Cava, E Poggiogalle, S. Cataldi, D. Cucinotta, G. Di Bella, M. Barbagallo, Morrone A: Malnutrition in elderly: social and economic determinants. (in press in J Nutr Healtli Aging)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parmelee PA, Thuras PD, Katz IR, Lawton MP: Validation of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale in a geriatric residential population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995,43(2):130–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Facts, research and intervention in gerontology. In: The Mini Nutritional Assessment: a practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly persons. 3rd ed. Paris: Serdi Publishing Company, 1997: 15–60Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Donini LM, De Felice MR, Tassi L, De Bemardini L, Pinto A, Giusti AM, Cannella C: A proportional and objective score for the Mini Nutritional Assessment in long-term geriatric care. J Nutr Health & Aging 2002, 6, 2141–2146Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsai AC, Ku PY, Tsai JD.: Population-specific anthropometric cutoff standards improve the functionality of the Mini Nutritional Assessment without BMI in institutionalized elderly in Taiwan. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008 Dec;12(10):696–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R: Manuale di riferimento per la standardizzazione antropometrica. EDRA, Milano 1992Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Norman K, Stobaus N, Gonzalez MC, Schulzke JD, Pirlich M: Hand grip strength: outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr. 2011 Apr;30(2):135–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    INRAN — Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sugli Alimenti e la Nutrizione: Tabelle di composizione degli alimenti. Carnevale, E., Marietta, L. eds. EDRA Milano, 2000, 140 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pfeiffer E: A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly subjects. J Am Geriatr Soc 1975,23(10):433–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale. A preliminary report. J Psych Res 1983; 17: 37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9(3): 179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc 1983; 31:721–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rolland Y, Lauwers-Cances V, Cournot M, Nourhashémi F, Reynish W, Rivière D, Vellas B, Grandjean H.: Sarcopenia, calf circumference, and physical function of elderly women: a cross-sectional study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Aug;51(8):1120–1124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bonnefoy M, Jauffret M, Kostka T, Jusot JF.: Usefulness of calf circumference measurement in assessing the nutritional state of hospitalized elderly people. Gerontology. 2002 May–Jun;48(3):162–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tsai AC, Lai MC, Chang TL.: Mid-arm and calf circumferences (MAC and CC) are better than body mass index (BMI) in predicting health status and mortality risk in institutionalized elderly Taiwanese. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 May–Jun;54(3):443–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aparecida Leandro-Merhi V, Luiz Braga de Aquino J, Gonzaga Teixeira de Camargo J.: Agreement between body mass index, calf circumference, arm circumference, habitual energy intake and the MNA in hospitalized elderly. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012 Feb;16(2):128–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chumlea WC: Is the MNA valid in different populations and across practice settings? J Nutr Health Aging. 2006 Nov–Dec;10(6):524–527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Allard JP, Aghdassi E, McArthur M, McGeer A, Simor A, Abdolell M, Stephens D, Liu B.: Nutrition risk factors for survival in the elderly living in Canadian long-term care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jan;52(1):59–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soini H, Routasalo P, Lagström H.: Characteristics of the Mini-Nutritional Assessment in elderly home-care patients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jan;58(l):64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chumlea WC, Guo S, Roche AF, Steinbaugh ML: Prediction of body weight for the nonambulatory elderly from anthropometry. J Am Diet Ass 1988, 88, 564–568Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Donini LM, De Felice MR, De Bemardini L, Ferrari G, Rosano, A, de’ Medici M, Cannella C: Body weight estimation in the Italian elderly. J Nutr Health & Aging 1998, 2, 92–95Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Donini LM, De Felice MR, De Bernardini L, Ferrari G, Rosano A, de’ Medici M, Cannella C: Prediction of stature in the Italian elderly. J Nutr Health & Aging 2000, 4,2, 72–76Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guo S, Wu X, Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Chumlea WC: Prediction of stature in the french elderly. Age et Nutrition 1994, 3, 169–173Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Myers S, Tagicuchi S, Yu M: Stature estimated from knee height in elderly Japanese Americans. JAGS 1995, 42, 157–160Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Uter W, Donini LM, Stange I, Volkert D, Diekmann R, Drey M, Bollwein J, Tempera S, Guerra A, Ricciardi LM, Sieber CC. Prospective validation of the modified mini nutritional assessment short-forms in the community, nursing home, and rehabilitation setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2124–2128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Piers LS, Soares MJ, Frandsen SL, O’Dea K.: Indirect estimates of body composition are useful for groups but unreliable in individuals. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Sep;24(9):1145–1152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Goonasegaran AR, Nabila FM, Shuhada NA: Comparison of the effectiveness of body mass index and body fat percentage in defining body composition. Singapore Med J. 2012 Jun;53(6):403–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bonnefoy M, Jauffret M, Kostka T, Jusot JF: Usefulness of calf circumference measurement in assessing the nutritional state of hospitalized elderly people. Gerontology 2002, 48, 162–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chumlea WC, Guo S, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL, Leahy CK: Reliability for anthropometric measurements in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HHANES 1982–1984). Am J Clin Nut 1990, 51, 902S–907SGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Serdi and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo M. Donini
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • E. Poggiogalle
    • 1
  • A. Morrone
    • 2
  • P. Scardella
    • 2
  • L. Piombo
    • 2
  • B. Neri
    • 1
  • E. Cava
    • 1
  • D. Cucinotta
    • 4
  • M. Barbagallo
    • 5
  • A. Pinto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department Experimental Medicine-Medical Physiopathology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section-Food Science and Human Nutrition Research UnitSapienza University of RomRomeItaly
  2. 2.Italian National Institute for HealthMigration and Poverty (NIHMP)RomeItaly
  3. 3.Rehabilitation Clinical Institute “Villa delle Querce” — NemiRomeItaly
  4. 4.“Villa Laura”BolognaItaly
  5. 5.Department of Clinical Medicine and Emerging Pathologies, Geriatrics UnitUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations