Agreement between different versions of MNA
- 300 Downloads
Malnutrition occurs frequently in the elderly with important clinical and functional consequences. Moreover, the treatment of malnutrition in the elderly may be effective if clinical and nutritional interventions are performed in the early stages. Therefore the early identification of the risk of malnutrition using validated and handy tools plays a pivotal role in terms of clinical outcome. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) was validated for this purpose since many years but it is still ongoing the debate over whether the use of different items in certain clinical conditions can be effective without affecting the validity of the nutritional status evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between different versions of MNA in the evaluation of nutritional risk in elderly subjects.
522 subjects, 345 women and 177 men, were recruited from nursing homes or were free living in three different regions in Italy. All subjects underwent a multidimensional geriatric evaluation, addressed especially to nutritional status. We compared three different versions of MNA: the “original” version; a “proportional” MNA (MNA-P) in which the total MNA score was replaced by the ratio between the maximum score that each subject could obtain without including the body mass index (BMI) and the total original MNA score; and a third version in which calf circumference (CC) and mid-upper arm circumference (MAC) were used instead of BMI.
According to the original MNA, a high prevalence of malnutrition was found out in both genders (26% of women and 16.3% of men); both the versions of MNA, in which BMI was not considered, showed a good predictive value compared to original MNA. In particular, the MNA-P. showed an overall efficiency equal to 89,1% with specificity and positive predictive value respectively equal to 97.5% and 95.2%. MNA-CC-MAC showed even better results in terms of overall efficiency (91.4%), sensitivity (81.1%), specificity (97.1%), positive and negative predictive values (94.2% and 94.4%, respectively).
The different versions of MNA gave similar results in the classifications of subjects and in comparison with nutritional and biochemical parameters. Moreover MNA versions that did not considered BMI seem to be more effective in singling out subjects with risk factors related to malnutrition (disability, reduced strength and calf circumference, anaemia).
Key wordsMNA malnutrition elderly
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Stratton RJ, Green CJ, Elia M.: Disease related malnutrition: an evidence based approach to Treatment. Wallingford, Oxon.: CABI Publishing. 2003. Pp. 824Google Scholar
- 6.Lattanzio F, Laino I, Pedone C, Corica F, Maltese G, Salerno G, Garasto S, Corsonello A, Incalzi RA; PharmacosurVeillance in the elderly Care (PVC) Study Group:Geriatric conditions and adverse drug reactions in elderly hospitalized patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Feb;13(2):96–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Rämsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, Thomas DR, Anthony PS, Charlton KE, Maggio M, Tsai AC, Vellas B, Sieber CC; Mini Nutritional Assessment International Group: Frequency of malnutrition in older adults: a multinational perspective using the mini nutritional assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Sep;58(9):1734–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Donini LM, P. Scardella, L. Piombo, B. Neri, Asprino R, A.R. Proietti, S Carcaterra, E Cava, E Poggiogalle, S. Cataldi, D. Cucinotta, G. Di Bella, M. Barbagallo, Morrone A: Malnutrition in elderly: social and economic determinants. (in press in J Nutr Healtli Aging)Google Scholar
- 15.Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Facts, research and intervention in gerontology. In: The Mini Nutritional Assessment: a practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly persons. 3rd ed. Paris: Serdi Publishing Company, 1997: 15–60Google Scholar
- 16.Donini LM, De Felice MR, Tassi L, De Bemardini L, Pinto A, Giusti AM, Cannella C: A proportional and objective score for the Mini Nutritional Assessment in long-term geriatric care. J Nutr Health & Aging 2002, 6, 2141–2146Google Scholar
- 18.Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R: Manuale di riferimento per la standardizzazione antropometrica. EDRA, Milano 1992Google Scholar
- 20.INRAN — Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sugli Alimenti e la Nutrizione: Tabelle di composizione degli alimenti. Carnevale, E., Marietta, L. eds. EDRA Milano, 2000, 140 ppGoogle Scholar
- 32.Chumlea WC, Guo S, Roche AF, Steinbaugh ML: Prediction of body weight for the nonambulatory elderly from anthropometry. J Am Diet Ass 1988, 88, 564–568Google Scholar
- 33.Donini LM, De Felice MR, De Bemardini L, Ferrari G, Rosano, A, de’ Medici M, Cannella C: Body weight estimation in the Italian elderly. J Nutr Health & Aging 1998, 2, 92–95Google Scholar
- 34.Donini LM, De Felice MR, De Bernardini L, Ferrari G, Rosano A, de’ Medici M, Cannella C: Prediction of stature in the Italian elderly. J Nutr Health & Aging 2000, 4,2, 72–76Google Scholar
- 35.Guo S, Wu X, Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Chumlea WC: Prediction of stature in the french elderly. Age et Nutrition 1994, 3, 169–173Google Scholar
- 36.Myers S, Tagicuchi S, Yu M: Stature estimated from knee height in elderly Japanese Americans. JAGS 1995, 42, 157–160Google Scholar
- 37.Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Uter W, Donini LM, Stange I, Volkert D, Diekmann R, Drey M, Bollwein J, Tempera S, Guerra A, Ricciardi LM, Sieber CC. Prospective validation of the modified mini nutritional assessment short-forms in the community, nursing home, and rehabilitation setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2124–2128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Chumlea WC, Guo S, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL, Leahy CK: Reliability for anthropometric measurements in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HHANES 1982–1984). Am J Clin Nut 1990, 51, 902S–907SGoogle Scholar