Uniform small metal nanoparticles anchored on CeO2 nanorods driven by electroless chemical deposition


We report a facile electroless chemical deposition (ECD) method to deposit uniform Pd nanoparticles ((2.5 ± 0.6) nm) on CeO2 nanorods (PdNPs/CeO2-ECD) through the interface redox reaction between the reduced CeO2 and Na2PdCl4. PdNPs/CeO2-ECD exhibits a stronger electronic metal–support interaction (EMSI) evidenced by higher reducibility and stronger anti-sintering capability at high temperatures, compared to that prepared by the conventional impregnation method. Such an EMSI effect of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD significantly improves its catalytic activity in CO oxidation. Besides, the chlorine residue-free catalysts through ECD process avoid the deleterious effect of chlorine on CO oxidation. This ECD process can further be extended to deposit various uniform nanoscaled noble metals (Au, Ag, Pt, Ru, Rh, etc.) on CeO2, which may deliver their potentials in advanced catalysis.

Graphical abstract


Heterogeneous catalysts integrating catalytically active components on various supports have attracted considerable efforts and shown their potential applications in energy conversion, environmental remediation and green catalysis [1,2,3]. Generally, the catalytic performance of heterogeneous catalysts is determined by active species (e.g., noble metals, transition metals) as well as supports (e.g., zeolite, metal oxides). The synergistic interactions between active centers and supports can significantly enhance the catalytic activity and selectivity, preserve the dispersion of active species on supports and improve the catalytic stability under the reaction environments [4]. Noble metals (Pt, Pd, Au, Ru, Rh, etc.) anchored on CeO2 show a strong electronic metal–support interaction (EMSI), which can improve their thermal stability and catalytic activity effectively [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Many factors including the surface physicochemical property of supports, morphology and size of active species, post-treatments and synthetic techniques play important roles in regulating the EMSI effects of heterogeneous catalysts [11,12,13,14,15].

Various synthetic techniques including impregnation (IM), deposition–precipitation (DP) and co-precipitation have generally been employed to prepare the rationally designed catalysts for desired catalysis [13]. However, the usage of complex chemical systems may introduce residues in catalysts, which may be poisonous to catalysis [16]. Some techniques such as atomic layer deposition (ALD) have also been developed to deposit uniform metal catalysts on supports with a prominent EMSI effect. However, the expensive instruments with high energy consumption and low synthetic productivity cannot satisfy the practical applications in a large scale. Compared with those conventional approaches and recently developed synthesis strategies, the electroless chemical deposition (ECD) method, in situ deposition of metal catalysts on various substrates, is of much competitiveness due to the advantages of low-cost, surfactant-free, low-energy consumption and scalable synthesis. ECD process is a non-galvanic process, which involves the simultaneous reactions in the liquid solution without the use of external electrical power. Such a deposition is driven by the redox potential difference of two half-reactions to overcome the inherent energy barriers in the solution environments. Successful ECD planting of metal nanoparticles on surfaces of various supports such as WO2.72, Ce(OH)3 and titanium(III) oxides has been realized [16,17,18,19,20,21].

In case of Ce(OH)3, synthesis of supports and ECD process has to be performed in oxygen-free environment due to the easy oxidation of Ce3+ species. Herein, we report a more facile ECD method to in situ deposit uniform and small Pd nanoparticles (PdNPs, ~ 2.5 nm) on CeO2 nanorods (PdNPs/CeO2-ECD) under ambient conditions. Synthesis of catalysts involves the chemical reduction of CeO2 nanorods by ascorbic acid (AA) and subsequent ECD deposition of Pd species on CeO2 driven by the interface redox reaction between the reduced CeO2 and Na2PdCl4. Compared to PdNPs on CeO2 nanorods prepared by impregnation (PdNPs/CeO2-IM), PdNPs/CeO2-ECD avoids the chlorine contamination and exhibits more pronounced EMSI effect, as evidenced by its higher reducibility, surface electron enrichment and stronger anti-sintering capability at high temperatures. All features of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD delivered its high catalytic activity of CO oxidation. Besides, this ECD process can be universal to deposit other noble metal catalysts (Ag, Au, Pt, Ru, Rh, etc.) on CeO2 as heterogeneous catalysts.


Synthesis of CeO2 nanorods

CeO2 nanorods were synthesized via a hydrothermal method modified from the previous studies [22, 23]. Briefly, 5 ml Ce(NO3)3 aqueous solution (0.8 mol·L−1) was added to 75 ml NaOH aqueous solution (6.4 mol·L−1) and stirred for 30 min. Then, the mixture was transferred to a 100-ml Teflon-lined autoclave and kept at 100 °C for 24 h. The obtained precipitates were washed by distilled water and ethanol alternatively three times and dried at 60 °C overnight.

ECD process for metal nanoparticles planting on CeO2 nanorods

The ECD method was performed through a two-step reaction. For PdNPs/CeO2-ECD samples, typically, 100 mg CeO2 nanorods was dispersed in 50 ml distilled water, followed by the addition of 1.0 ml 0.1 mol·L−1 ascorbic acid under stirring. After 30 min, the reduced CeO2 nanorods were centrifuged off and washed with copious amounts of distilled water three times and then re-dispersed in distilled water by ultrasonic with a concentration of 1.0 mg·ml−1. Next, the desired amount of Na2PdCl4 solution was added into 100 ml stock reduced CeO2 nanorods solution under stirring for ECD process with reaction time of tens of minutes. For other noble metal nanoparticles, RuCl3, RhCl3, AgNO3, Na2PtCl6 and HAuCl4 were used as metal precursors for the ECD process, respectively.

For synthesis of 2.0 wt% PdNPs/CeO2 samples, two approaches of the one-shot and multiple-cycle ECD processes were employed. For one-shot reaction, the desired amount of Na2PdCl4 solution was directly added into the aqueous dispersion of the reduced CeO2 nanorods to achieve the theoretical Pd loading of 2.0 wt%. For the multiple-cycle ECD process, the ECD process for the 0.5 wt% PdNPs/CeO2 catalysts was repeated four times consecutively.

Synthesis of PdNPs/CeO2 by impregnation method

Briefly, 100 mg CeO2 nanorods was suspended in 5 ml ethanol solution with desired amount of Na2PdCl4 at room temperature for 1 h. Later, the mixture was heated to 100 °C until the solution volatilized completely. Finally, the PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts were obtained after reduction by a mixed gas of 5 vol% H2/Ar at 350 °C for 60 min.


Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements were taken using a Hitachi HT-7700 electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were obtained on the FEI Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN microscope with the accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were taken using a Rigaku Powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) measurements for analysis of elemental contents were taken using an Agilent 7500ce instrument. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were acquired on a Thermo Electron Model K-Alpha with Al Kα as the excitation sources. Raman spectra were recorded on a Renishaw inVia Reflex laser microprobe Raman spectroscopy with the excitation wavelength of 514 nm.

H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) measurements

H2-TPR was carried out in a ChemBET TPR/TPD3000 apparatus. For a typical measurement, 20 mg unreduced sample was loaded into the reactor. Prior to measurement, the samples were pre-treated in Ar at 200 °C for 1 h and cooled down to room temperature. Then, a mixture gas of 5 vol% H2/Ar (30 ml·min−1) was introduced at room temperature under a temperature-programmed procedure with a ramping rate of 10 °C·min−1.

Pd dispersion of catalysts

CO chemisorption was performed on a quantachrome instrument (ChemBET TPR/TPD chemisorption analyzer), which was employed to determine the Pd dispersions of various Pd/CeO2 catalysts. A given amount of 10 vol% CO in He (50 μl) was introduced in a pulse per 5 min at room temperature until the intensity of the peak reached a constant value. Before test, all samples were calcined at 350, 425 and 500 °C in air for 4 h, respectively.

Catalytic CO oxidation

CO oxidation reaction was used as a probe reaction to compare the catalytic activity of the PdNPs/CeO2 catalysts prepared via different methods. Before the reaction, all catalysts were treated under a 50 ml·min−1 flowing mixture gas of H2/Ar with the volumetric ratio of 1:9 at 350 °C for 60 min. For the CO oxidation reaction, the activity of catalysts was evaluated on a homemade fixed-bed quartz reactor connected to a flow apparatus with the mass flow controllers. The mixture gas of 0.5 ml·min−1 CO, 0.5 ml·min−1 O2 and 49 ml·min−1 Ar was delivered into the reactor where 250 mg pre-treated catalysts (150–280 μm) was filled. The temperature ramping rate was controlled at 5 °C·min−1. The progress of CO oxidation was monitored by an online gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID).

Results and discussion

TEM and XRD results

CeO2 nanorods were synthesized according to a previously reported hydrothermal method [22, 23]. CeO2 nanorods exhibited a smooth surface with a length of 100–200 nm and a diameter of ~ 10 nm (Fig. S1). AA, a harmless natural product, was employed to reduce CeO2 nanorods. The reduced CeO2 nanorods preserved their rodlike morphological features as that of the freshly synthesized nanorods (Fig. 1a). Derived from XPS spectra of the Ce 3d core level (Fig. S2 and Fig. 2a), the surface Ce3+ content of the reduced CeO2 nanorods was increased from 17.3 at% of as-synthesized CeO2 nanorods to 31.6 at%, indicating the successful reduction of CeO2 nanorods. After the ECD process between the reduced CeO2 and the aqueous Na2PdCl4 precursor, the typical TEM image (Fig. 1b) shows the similar rodlike morphology decorated with uniform and small nanoparticles of (2.5 ± 0.6) nm (Fig. S3). The fringe spacing (0.282 nm) of the deposited nanoparticles in the HRTEM corresponds to the (200) facet of PdOx, demonstrating the formation of Pd species on the surface of the CeO2 nanorods (Fig. 1c). The results of XPS can further confirm that most of the Pd species exist in + 2 valence state (Fig. S4). The formation of PdOx may be attributed to the ECD and subsequent oxidation of the metallic Pd by the dissolved oxygen. To confirm this hypothesis, the ECD process was also performed in the degassed conditions under the protection of high-purity Ar (99.999%), where Pd precursor (Na2PdCl4) and the reduced CeO2 nanorods were used. The obtained nanoparticles on CeO2 were identified as Pd metal, with a fringe spacing of 0.195 nm corresponding to the (200) facet of Pd (Fig. S5). Thus, the oxidation of metal nanoparticles might be avoidable in the absence of oxygen. XRD patterns in Fig. 1g show that the as-synthesized CeO2 nanorods, reduced CeO2 nanorods and PdNPs/CeO2-ECD are cubic fluorite structures (PDF No. 75-0076). Thus, the post-treatment of chemical reduction and ECD process did not induce the morphology and the phase change of CeO2 nanorods. The actual Pd loadings on supports were determined by ICP-AES. For the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts with a theoretical Pd loading of 0.5 wt%, ICP-AES result (Fig. 1f) reveals that Pd was successfully and completely planted. Notably, it only took tens of minutes for the Pd planting, indicating the efficient and time-saving process of ECD technique.

Fig. 1

Typical TEM images of a reduced CeO2 nanorods and b 0.5 wt% PdNPs/CeO2 prepared by ECD method; c HRTEM image of metal nanoparticles on 0.5 wt% PdNPs/CeO2 prepared by ECD method; TEM images of d 2 wt% PdNPs/CeO2 prepared by adding Pd sources over four ECD cycling reactions and e 2 wt% PdNPs/CeO2 prepared by adding Pd sources over a one-shot reaction; f ICP-AES results of Pd loadings via one-shot ECD process and multiple-cycle ECD process; g XRD patterns of as-synthesized CeO2 nanorods, reduced CeO2 nanorods and PdNPs/CeO2-ECD

Fig. 2

Evolutions in a surface Ce3+ content derived from XPS Ce 3d core levels and b relative concentrations of oxygen vacancy derived from Raman spectra for as-synthesized CeO2, reduced CeO2 and obtained PdNPs/CeO2 prepared by ECD method; c schematic diagram of ECD reacting mechanism based on three steps: (i) chemical reduction of CeO2, (ii) nucleation of Pd nanoparticles on CeO2 nanorods with electron transfer and (iii) ripening of Pd particles

To control the planting amount of Pd on CeO2 is also expected for the ECD technique. Specifically, for a theoretical Pd loading of 2 wt%, both large nanoparticles (> 5.0 nm) and small nanoparticles (~ 2.5 nm) were co-deposited on CeO2 nanorods when the desired Pd source was directly added through a one-shot injection (Fig. 1e). To solve this problem, the strategy by repeating the ECD process with a low Pd loading was found to obtain uniform and small PdOx nanoparticles. As shown in Fig. 1d, performing the ECD process for four cycles with a 0.5 wt% Pd loading for each cycle led to the formation of PdOx nanoparticles with a uniform size of (2.8 ± 0.8) nm (Fig. S6), which was very close to that of 0.5 wt% PdNPs/CeO2 ((2.5 ± 0.6) nm, Fig. 1b). The actual Pd loading amount of catalysts prepared through the repeated ECD process was close to the theoretical value (Fig. 1f). The above results exhibit that the cycling of the ECD process preserves the uniform and small nanoparticles, when the high loading of metal is expected. The completely different growth behaviors of one-shot and multiple-cycle methods can be attributed to the preferential nucleation at the surface defects of CeO2 nanorods. For one-shot synthesis, some of the formed PdOx nanoparticles might serve as the nuclei for the ripening growth of larger particles, when more metal precursors were available. Consequently, the uneven size distribution of PdOx nanoparticles was observed (Fig. 1e). In contrast, the multiple-cycle synthesis creates the freshly exposed surface defects of CeO2 nanorods after each chemical reduction, which are preferential sites for the nucleation and growth of Pd species in the presence of limited amount of metal precursor. Thus, it results in the formation of uniform and small PdOx nanoparticles. Moreover, as shown in the scalable optical and TEM images (Fig. S7), 1.0 g PdNPs/CeO2 nanorods (Pd based, 0.5 wt%) was synthesized through a one-shot ECD reaction, with similar size of Pd nanoparticles (~ 2.6 nm).

Proposed synthetic mechanism

To identify the role of Ce3+ species for ECD process, the XPS technique was used to examine the surface Ce3+ species. The surface Ce3+ content delivered the initial increase from 17.3 at% of the as-synthesized CeO2 nanorods to 31.6 at% of the reduced CeO2 nanorods and the subsequent decrease to 18.1 at% after ECD process (Fig. 2a and Fig. S2). The results indicate that Ce3+ species serve as the reducing regent by donating electrons to metal precursor [18]. The evolution of oxygen vacancy accompanied with changes in Ce3+ content was also monitored by Raman spectroscopy. The Raman peaks at ~ 455 and 600 cm−1 in Raman spectra (Fig. S8) are ascribed to the vibrational mode (F2g) of the fluorite-type structure and the oxygen vacancies of CeO2, respectively [23]. The ratio of integral areas of peaks at 600 and 455 cm−1 (A600/A455) is used as an indicator to reflect the concentration of oxygen vacancy. As shown in Fig. 2b and Fig. S8, the ratios of A600/A455 are increased from 0.0424 of as-synthesized CeO2 to 0.0908 of the reduced CeO2 nanorods and decreased again to 0.0503 after planting of PdOx nanoparticles. The recovery of the concentration of oxygen vacancy demonstrates that the formation of PdOx nanoparticles consumes the surface Ce3+ species during the ECD process. Therefore, the ECD process for planting PdNPs on CeO2 is illustrated in Fig. 2c, in which the electron transfers from the reduced CeO2 with a high surface Ce3+ content and large concentration of oxygen vacancy to metal precursors boosts the nucleation and ripening of PdOx.

H2-TPR and anti-sintering capability

Aiming at demonstrating the metal/support interaction and surface reducibility, temperature-programmed reduction by hydrogen (H2-TPR) was performed. As comparative studies, the conventional impregnation method was also used to deposit PdNPs on CeO2 nanorods (~ 2.4 nm), named as PdNPs/CeO2-IM (Fig. S9). The Pd loading was fixed at 0.5 wt% for all catalysts. In their H2-TPR profiles (Fig. 3a), one peak centered at ~ 127 °C was observed for the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts which was related to the reduction of the PdOx species and part of support surface oxygen species strongly interacted with PdOx [24]. However, two overlapping reduction peaks at 200–280 °C appeared on the H2-TPR profile of the PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts, corresponding to the reduction of PdOx and interfacial oxygen species due to spillover effect. The reduction peak for PdNPs/CeO2-ECD shifts to lower temperature, indicating an easier reduction of surface oxygen species. Moreover, the higher reducibility of surface oxygen species of the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts indicates that a stronger interaction between Pd nanoparticles and supports is induced by ECD process, compared with that of the PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts [25,26,27].

Fig. 3

H2-TPR and anti-sintering capability to describe EMSI effects of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD and PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts characterized by a H2-TPR and b CO dispersions after thermal treatments at 350, 425 and 500 °C

To further evaluate the EMSI effects between Pd nanoparticles and CeO2 supports, the anti-sintering capability of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD and PdNPs/CeO2-IM was tested under high temperatures. The Pd dispersions measured by CO chemisorption after thermal treatments under various temperatures (350, 425 and 500 °C) are shown in Fig. 3b and Table S1. The Pd dispersions of the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts remained near the same values (around 25.5%, Table S1) with the increase in the calcination temperatures. In contrast, the Pd dispersions of PdNPs/CeO2-IM significantly dropped from 37.6% at 350 °C to 36.3% at 425 °C and 19.1% at 500 °C (Table S1). It can be attributed to the thermal sintering of Pd nanoparticles due to the weaker interaction between Pd and CeO2 support.

XPS analysis

Oxidation states of Pd species and surface oxygen species of catalysts were further analyzed. As shown in Fig. 4a, the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts show two Pd 3d5/2 peaks at 335.1 and 337.2 eV, which can be attributed to the typical characteristics of metallic Pd and Pd2+, respectively, while the PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts only exhibit one oxidized Pd 3d5/2 peak at 337.9 eV, which shifts to higher binding energy compared to the oxidized peak of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD. The results reveal that the PdNPs synthesized through ECD methods are electron-richer than those of PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts. The O 1s XPS spectra of two samples exhibits a main peak at around 529 eV and a shoulder peak at about 531 eV. The main peak at around 529 eV can be assigned to lattice oxygen of bulk CeO2, and the shoulder peak at about 531 eV represents surface chemisorbed oxygen [28]. The more surface chemisorbed oxygen for PdNPs/CeO2-ECD is ascribed to a higher portion of surface oxygen vacancies which can contribute to the activation of O2 and accelerate the reaction rate of CO oxidation. Thus, the strong electronic metal–support interaction (EMSI) is evidenced in PdNPs/CeO2-ECD.

Fig. 4

a Pd 3d and b O 1s XPS spectra of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD and PdNPs/CeO2-IM

CO oxidation test

Noble metals (Pd, Pt, Au, Ag, etc.) anchored on various supports are broadly explored for CO oxidation in automobile exhaust catalytic reactions, water–gas shift reaction and preferential oxidation of CO in excess hydrogen [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Herein, CO oxidation was designated as a model reaction to evaluate the catalytic activity of the PdNPs/CeO2 synthesized by ECD and impregnation methods. As revealed in the light-off curves (Fig. 5a), the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts delivered the much better catalytic activity for CO oxidation than the PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts. As presented in Fig. S10 and Fig. 5b, the corresponding Arrhenius plots revealed that the apparent activation energy (Ea) of the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts was 36.9 kJ·mol−1, smaller than the value of 53.4 kJ·mol−1 for the PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts. Derived from light-off curves, as exhibited in Fig. 5b, T50, T90 and T99 at the temperatures of 50%, 90% and 99% CO conversions for the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts were also much smaller than those for the PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts. For example, T99 for PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts was 130 °C, which was 53 °C lower than the corresponding value of 183 °C for PdNPs/CeO2-IM catalysts. Furthermore, turnover frequency was calculated to compare their intrinsic catalytic activity at 30 °C (CO conversion < 20%), indicating a higher intrinsic catalytic activity of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD, compared to PdNPs/CeO2-IM (Fig. 5b). Pd/CeO2 catalyst with 2% loading synthesized through the thermal decomposition method completely transformed CO to CO2 over 150 °C [35]. The catalytic activity of Pd/CeO2 catalyst prepared by co-precipitation method is also much lower than that of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD in this work [36]. Therefore, ECD method is a facile and simple way to prepare highly efficient catalysts.

Fig. 5

a Catalytic performance for CO oxidation and b comparison of T50, T90, T99 and corresponding Turnover frequency (TOF) values of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD and PdNPs/CeO2-IM at 30 °C, respectively

Although PdNPs/CeO2-IM exhibits a higher dispersion of Pd nanoparticles, their catalytic activity was much lower than that of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD. First of all, the in situ growth of Pd nanoparticles on CeO2 by ECD method delivers uniform particles and prominent EMSI effect with enhanced reducibility and anti-sintering capability at high temperatures, which facilitate higher catalytic activity of PdNPs/CeO2-ECD for CO oxidation. Secondly, surface electron enrichment on Pd induced by EMSI can modulate the CO absorption on the metal surface and inhibit CO poison effect [17]. Also, the abundant surface oxygen vacancies improve oxygen activation. Thirdly, it has been proofed by previous literatures that the existence of chloride ions can poison the noble metal catalysts and restrain the activity of catalysts subsequently [37, 38]. The presence of chloride ions also can fill the oxygen vacancies close to the interfaces of Pd nanoparticles and ceria and further depress the spillover and back-spillover speed of reactants seriously [38]. XPS profiles (Fig. S11) indicate the existence of chlorine in PdNPs/CeO2-IM. The residual chloride ions in PdNPs/CeO2-IM are deleterious to the catalytic activity of Pd active components. In contrast, chlorine is barely detectable in PdNPs/CeO2-ECD. Therefore, the high catalytic activity of Pd/CeO2-ECD catalysts can be ascribed to the combination of the uniform Pd nanoparticles, stronger electronic metal–support interaction and clean surface-active sites given by ECD method, which makes ECD technique practical for synthesis of nanoscaled catalysts.

General synthesis of metal/CeO2

The current ECD method can be further extended to plant series of noble metal particles on CeO2 supports. Successful deposition of uniform noble metal catalysts (e.g., Ru, Rh, Ag, Pt and Au) was realized through the similar synthetic process between the reduced CeO2 nanorods and noble metal precursors. Typical TEM and HRTEM images and size distributions are presented in Fig. 6a–e and Fig. S12, showing the small size (< 3 nm) of noble metal particles. Figure 6f shows the actual loadings of noble metals on CeO2 nanorods, where the theoretical value was fixed at 0.5 wt% for all noble metals. The metal loadings of Rh, Ag and Au were completely planted on CeO2 nanorods, while the metal loadings of Ru and Pt were smaller than 0.5 wt%. Therefore, successful realization of decoration of various noble metal nanoparticles on CeO2 further proves that this ECD technique is a facile, effective and universal approach to synthesize small nanoparticles on CeO2 supports.

Fig. 6

Typical TEM and HRTEM images of different a Ru, b Rh, c Ag, d Pt and e Au nanoparticles planted on CeO2 nanorods synthesized via ECD method; f actual loading amounts of noble metals (with theoretical value of 0.5 wt%) determined by ICP-AES


In summary, we develop a feasible, scalable and universal ECD technique as a facile and green synthetic approach to plant uniform and small Pd nanoparticles (~ 2.5 nm) as well as other noble metals (Ru, Rh, Ag, Pt and Au) on the reducible CeO2 nanorod supports under ambient conditions. This method with high repeatability is cost-effective, efficient and time-saving. Moreover, the absence or decreased usage of surfactants and other chemicals can reduce the fabrication cost, possibility in the secondary environmental contamination and poison on the catalytic sites. Specifically, the PdNPs/CeO2-ECD catalysts deliver a higher activity for CO oxidation due to their uniform Pd catalysts, chlorine-free, stronger metal–support interaction associated with high reducibility and strong anti-sintering capability, compared to the catalysts prepared by impregnation method. We believe the developed ECD method in this work delivers well-defined heterogeneous composites, which have great potential applications in catalysis as well as numerous other frontiers.


  1. [1]

    Barakat T, Rooke JC, Genty E, Cousin R, Siffert S, Su BL. Gold catalysts in environmental remediation and water–gas shift technologies. Energy Environ Sci. 2013;6(2):371.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    Liu LC, Corma A. Metal catalysts for heterogeneous catalysis: from single atoms to nanoclusters and nanoparticles. Chem Rev. 2018;118(10):4981.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    Ma YY, Gao W, Zhang ZY, Zhang S, Tian ZM, Liu YX, Ho JC, Qu YQ. Regulating the surface of nanoceria and its applications in heterogeneous catalysis. Surf Sci Rep. 2018;73(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    Ahmadi M, Mistry H, Cuenya BR. Tailoring the catalytic properties of metal nanoparticles via support interactions. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016;7(17):3519.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    Das J, Cederquist KB, Zaragoza AA, Lee PE, Sargent EH, Kelley SO. An ultrasensitive universal detector based on neutralizer displacement. Nat Chem. 2012;4(8):642.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    Bruix A, Rodriguez JA, Ramirez PJ, Senanayake SD, Evans J, Park JB, Stacchiola D, Liu P, Hrbek J, Illas F. A new type of strong metal-support interaction and the production of H2 through the transformation of water on Pt/CeO2(111) and Pt/CeOx/TiO2(110) catalysts. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(21):8968.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    Tang H, Su Y, Zhang B, Lee AF, Isaacs MA, Wilson K, Li L, Ren YG, Huang JH, Haruta M, Qiao BT, Liu X, Jin CZ, Su DS, Wang JH, Zhang T. Classical strong metal–support interactions between gold nanoparticles and titanium dioxide. Sci Adv. 2017;3(10):e170023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    Ro I, Resasco J, Christopher D. Approaches for understanding and controlling interfacial effects in oxide-supported metal catalysts. ACS Catal. 2018;8(8):7368.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    Matsubu JC, Zhang SY, Derita L, Marinkovic Chen JG, Graham GW, Pan XQ, Christopher P. Adsorbate-mediated strong metal-support interactions in oxide-supported Rh catalysts. Nat Chem. 2017;9(2):120.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    Hou TT, Wang YH, Zhang J, Li MR, Lu JM, Heggen M, Sievers C, Wang F. Peculiar hydrogenation reactivity of Ni–Niσ+ clusters stabilized by ceria in reducing nitrobenzene to azoxybenzene. J Catal. 2017;353:107.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    Wang M, Wang F, Ma JP, Li MR, Zhang Z, Wang YH, Zhang XC, Xu J. Investigations on the crystal plane effect of ceria on gold catalysis in the oxidative dehydrogenation of alcohols and amines in the liquid phase. Chem Commun. 2014;50(3):292.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    Acerbi N, Tsang S, Jones G, Golunski S, Collier P. Rationalization of interactions in precious metal/ceria catalysts using the d-band center model. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52(30):7737.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    Munnik P, Jongh P, Jong K. Recent developments in the synthesis of supported catalysts. Chem Rev. 2015;115(14):6687.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    Guo Y, Mei S, Yuan K, Wang DJ, Liu HC, Yan CH, Zhang YW. Low-temperature CO2 methanation over CeO2-supported Ru single atoms, nanoclusters, and nanoparticles competitively tuned by strong metal-supported interactions and H-spillover effect. ACS Catal. 2018;8(7):6203.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    Wang WW, Yu WZ, Du PP, Xu H, Jin Z, Si R, Ma C, Shi S, Jia CJ, Yan CH. Crystal plane effect of ceria on supported copper oxide cluster catalysts for CO oxidation: importance of metal-supported interaction. ACS Catal. 2017;7(2):1313.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    Liu K, Wang AQ, Zhang T. Recent advances in preferential oxidation of CO reaction over platinum group metal catalysts. ACS Catal. 2012;2(6):1165.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    Cao FX, Zhang S, Gao W, Cao T, Qu YQ. Facile synthesis of highly-dispersed Pt/CeO2 by a spontaneous surface redox chemical reaction for CO oxidation. Catal Sci Technol. 2018;8(13):3233.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. [18]

    Xi GC, Ye JH, Ma Q, Su N, Bai H, Wang C. In situ growth of metal particles on 3D urchin-like WO3 nanostructures. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(15):6508.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    Xie Y, Ding KL, Liu ZM, Tao RT, Sun ZY, Zhang HY, An GM. In situ controllable loading of ultrafine noble metal particles on titania. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(19):6648.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    Mitsudome T, Yamamoto M, Maeno Z, Mizugaki T, Jitsukawa K, Kaneda K. One-step synthesis of core-gold/shell-ceria nanomaterial and its catalysis for highly selective semihydrogenation of alkynes. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(42):13452.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    Bensalem A, Shafeev G, Bozon-Verduraz F. Application of electroless procedures to the preparation of palladium catalysts. Catal Lett. 1993;18(1–2):165.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    Li J, Zhang ZY, Tian ZM, Zhou XM, Zheng ZP, Ma YY, Qu YQ. Low pressure induced porous nanorods of ceria with high reducibility and large oxygen storage capacity: synthesis an catalytic applications. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2(39):16459.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    Mai HX, Sun LD, Zhang YW, Si R, Feng W, Zhang HP, Liu HC, Yan CH. Shape-selective synthesis and oxygen storage behavior of ceria nanopolyhedra, nanorods, and nanocubes. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109(51):24380.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    Tang XL, Zhang BC, Li Y, Xu YD, Xin Q, Shen WJ. Structural features and catalytic properties of Pt/CeO2 catalysts prepared by modified reduction-deposition techniques. Catal Lett. 2004;97(3–4):163.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    Wei YC, Liu J, Zhao Z, Duan AJ, Jiang GY. The catalysts of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous Ce1−xZrxO2-supported gold nanoparticles for soot combustion: the metal-support interaction. J Catal. 2012;287:13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    Xu LL, Pu CH, Wang L, Guo Y, Guo YL, Lu GZ. Effect of calcination temperature on meso-Pd/Fe(OH)x for CO oxidation at low temperature. Chin J Rare Met. 2018;42(2):161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    Qu J, Zhou XW, Xu F, Gong XQ, Tsang S. Shape effect of Pd-promoted Ga2O3 nanocatalysts for methanol synthesis by CO2 hydrogenation. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118(42):24452.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. [28]

    Tan HY, Wang J, Yu SZ, Zhou KB. Support morphology-dependent catalytic activity of Pd/CeO2 for formaldehyde oxidation. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(14):8675.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. [29]

    Zhang SR, Shan JJ, Zhu Y, Nguyen L, Huang WX, Yoshida H, Takeda S, Tao FF. Restructuring transition metal oxide nanorods for 100% selective in reduction of nitric oxide with carbon monoxide. Nano Lett. 2013;13(7):3310.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. [30]

    Rodriguez JA, Grinter DC, Liu ZY, Polomino RM, Senanayake SD. Ceria-based model catalysts: fundamental studies on the importance of the metal-ceria interface in CO oxidation, the water–gas shift, CO2 hydrogenation, and methane and alcohol reforming. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46(7):1824.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. [31]

    Wen C, Zhu Y, Ye YC, Zhang SR, Cheng F, Liu Y, Wang P, Tao FF. Water-gas shift reaction on metal nanoclusters encapsulated in mesoporous ceria studied with ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. ACS Nano. 2012;6(10):9305.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. [32]

    Tao FF, Ma Z. Water-gas shift on gold catalysts: catalysts systems and fundamental studies. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15(37):15260.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. [33]

    Du PP, Wang WW, Jia CJ, Song QS, Huang YY, Si R. Effect of strongly bound copper species in copper-ceria catalyst for preferential of carbon monoxide. Appl Catal A Gen. 2016;518:87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. [34]

    Chen YS, Cao YD, Ran R, Wu XD, Weng D. Controlled pore size of Pt/KIT-6 used for propane total oxidation. Rare Met. 2018;37(2):123.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. [35]

    Gulyaev RV, Stadnichenko AI, Slavinskaya EM, Ivanova AS, Koscheev SV, Boronin AI. In situ preparation and investigation of Pd/CeO2 catalysts for the low-temperature oxidation of CO. Appl Catal A Gen. 2012;439:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. [36]

    Slavinskaya EM, Gulyaeva RV, Zadesenets AV, Stonkus OA, Zaikovskii VI, Shubinb YV, Korenev SV, Boronin AI. Low-temperature CO oxidation by Pd/CeO2 catalysts synthesized using the coprecipitation method. Appl Catal B Environ. 2015;166:91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. [37]

    Kung MC, Davis RJ, Kung HH. Understanding Au-catalyzed low-temperature CO oxidation. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111(32):767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. [38]

    Gayen A, Boaro M, de Leitenburg C, Llorca J, Trovarelli A. Activity, durability and microstructural characterization of ex-nitrate and ex-chloride Pt/Ce0.56Zr0.44O2 catalysts for low temperature water gas shift reaction. J Catal. 2010;270:285.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21872109 and 61774109), the State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials (No. 20182005) and the Hundred Talents Program of Shanxi Province, the Youth “Sanjin” Scholar Program and the Key R&D Project of Shanxi Province (No. 201603D421032). Prof. Yong-Quan Qu is also supported by the Cyrus Tang Foundation through Tang Scholar Program.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Quan Qu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3862 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Cao, F., Gao, W. et al. Uniform small metal nanoparticles anchored on CeO2 nanorods driven by electroless chemical deposition. Rare Met. 39, 806–814 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-019-01266-7

Download citation


  • Electroless chemical deposition
  • Electronic metal–support interaction
  • Pd/CeO2
  • CO oxidation