In this paper, we construct and implement a new improvement of third order weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) scheme in the finite difference framework for hyperbolic conservation laws. In our approach, a modification in the global smoothness measurement is reported by applying all three points on global stencil \((i-1,i,i+1)\) which is used for convergence of non-linear weights towards the optimal weights at critical points and achieves the desired order of accuracy for third order WENO scheme. We use the third order accurate total variation diminishing (TVD) Runge-Kutta time stepping method. The major advantage of the proposed scheme is its better numerical accuracy in smooth regions. The computational performance of the proposed WENO scheme with this global smoothness measurement is verified in several benchmark one- and two-dimensional test cases for scalar and vector hyperbolic equations. Extensive computational results confirm that the new proposed scheme achieves better performance as compared with WENO-JS3, WENO-Z3 and WENO-F3 schemes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Jiang, G.-S., Shu, C.-W.: Efficient implementation of weighted eno schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126(1), 202–228 (1996)
Harten, A.: High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49(3), 357–393 (1983)
Harten, A.: On a class of high resolution total-variation-stable finite-difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21(1), 1–23 (1984)
Harten, A., Osher, S., Engquist, B., Chakravarthy, S.R.: Some results on uniformly high-order accurate essentially nonoscillatory schemes. Appl. Numer. Math. 2(3–5), 347–377 (1986)
Harten, A., Osher, S.: Uniformly high-order accurate nonoscillatory schemes. i. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24(2), 279–309 (1987)
Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., Chan, T.: Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115(1), 200–212 (1994)
Balsara, D.S., Shu, C.-W.: Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 160(2), 405–452 (2000)
Henrick, A.K., Aslam, T.D., Powers, J.M.: Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: achieving optimal order near critical points. J. Comput. Phys. 207(2), 542–567 (2005)
Borges, R., Carmona, M., Costa, B., Don, W.S.: An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 227(6), 3191–3211 (2008)
Yamaleev, N.K., Carpenter, M.H.: Third-order energy stable weno scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 228(8), 3025–3047 (2009)
Castro, M., Costa, B., Don, W.S.: High order weighted essentially non-oscillatory weno-z schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 230(5), 1766–1792 (2011)
Don, W.-S., Borges, R.: Accuracy of the weighted essentially non-oscillatory conservative finite difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 250, 347–372 (2013)
Xiaoshuai, W., Yuxin, Z.: A high-resolution hybrid scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 78(3), 162–187 (2015)
Wu, X., Liang, J., Zhao, Y.: A new smoothness indicator for third-order weno scheme. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 81(7), 451–459 (2016)
Balsara, D.S., Garain, S., Shu, C.-W.: An efficient class of weno schemes with adaptive order. J. Comput. Phys. 326, 780–804 (2016)
Zhu, J., Qiu, J.: A new fifth order finite difference weno scheme for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 318, 110–121 (2016)
Kumar, R., Chandrashekar, P.: Simple smoothness indicator and multi-level adaptive order WENO scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 375, 1059–1090 (2018)
Kumar, R., Chandrashekar, P.: Efficient seventh order WENO schemes of adaptive order for hyperbolic conservation laws. Comput. Fluids. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.06.003
Ha, Y., Kim, C.H., Lee, Y.J., Yoon, J.: An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme with a new smoothness indicator. J. Comput. Phys. 232(1), 68–86 (2013)
Fan, P., Shen, Y., Tian, B., Yang, C.: A new smoothness indicator for improving the weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 269, 329–354 (2014)
Acker, F., Borges, R.R., Costa, B.: An improved WENO-z scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 313, 726–753 (2016)
Xu, W., Wu, W.: Improvement of third-order WENO-Z scheme at critical points. Comput. Math. Appl. 75(9), 3431–3452 (2018)
Xu, W., Wu, W.: An improved third-order weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme achieving optimal order near critical points. Comput. Fluids 162, 113–125 (2018)
Gande, N.R., Rathod, Y., Rathan, S.: Third-order weno scheme with a new smoothness indicator. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 85(2), 90–112 (2017)
Zalesak, S.T.: Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluids. J. Comput. Phys. 31(3), 335–362 (1979)
Sod, G.A.: A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27(1), 1–31 (1978)
Lax, P.D.: Weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations and their numerical computation. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 7(1), 159–193 (1954)
Woodward, P., Colella, P.: The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54(1), 115–173 (1984)
Lax, P.D., Liu, X.-D.: Solution of two-dimensional riemann problems of gas dynamics by positive schemes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19(2), 319–340 (1998)
The authors are thankful to Center for Fundamental Research in Space Dynamics and Celestial Mechanics (CFRSC), New Delhi, Delhi, India for providing research facilities. We also express gratitude to CSIR, Govt. of India for the grant reference no. 09/045(1438)/2016-EMR-I.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Kaur, B. An Improvement of Third Order WENO Scheme for Convergence Rate at Critical Points with New Non-linear Weights. Differ Equ Dyn Syst 28, 539–557 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12591-019-00508-5
- Smoothness measurement
- Critical points
- Sufficient condition
- Convergence analysis