Journal of Earth Science

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 245–254 | Cite as

Time Scale of Partial Melting of KLB-1 Peridotite: Constrained from Experimental Observation and Thermodynamic Models

Petrology and Mineral Deposits

Abstract

Partial melting experiments were carried on KLB-1 peridotite, a xenolith sample from the Earth’s upper mantle, at 1.5 GPa and temperatures from 1 300 to 1 600 °C, with heating time varies from 1 to 30 min. We quantify the axial temperature gradient in the deformation-DIA apparatus (D-DIA) and constrain the time scale of partial melting by comparing experimental observations with calculated result from pMELTS program. The compositions of the liquid phase and the coexisting solid phases (clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene, and olivine) agree well with those calculated from pMELTS program, suggesting that local chemical equilibrium achieves during partial melting, although longer heating time is required to homogenize the bulk sample. The Mg# (=Mg/(Mg+Fe) mol.%) of olivines from the 1-minute heating experiment changed continuously along the axial of the graphite capsule. A thermal gradient of 50 °C/mm was calculated by comparing the Mg# of olivine grains with the output of pMELTS program. Olivine grains at the hot end of the graphite capsule from the three experiments heated at 1 400 °C but with different annealing time show consistence on Mg#, indicating that partitioning of Fe2+ between the olivine grains and the silicate melt happened fast, and partial melting occurs in seconds.

Key words

peridotite partial melting temperature gradient pMELTS program 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

KLB-1 samples used in this study were generously denoted by Prof. Claude Herzberg from Rutgers University. We thank Christopher A. Vidito from Rutgers University for his support with all the electron microprobe measurements and Jim Quinn from Stony Brook University for the SEM measurement. The authors acknowledge support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41773052), and the National Science Foundation of USA (Nos. EAR 1141895, EAR 1045629, and EAR 0968823). The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-018-0839-8.

Supplementary material

12583_2018_839_MOESM1_ESM.docx (34 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 33.5 KB.

References Cited

  1. Agee, C. B., Walker, D., 1990. Aluminum Partitioning between Olivine and Ultrabasic Silicate Liquid to 6GPa. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 105(3): 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00306537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. L., Sammis, C., 1970. Partial Melting in the Upper Mantle. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 3: 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(70)90042-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asimow, P. D., Ghiorso, M. S., 1998. Algorithmic Modifications Extending MELTS to Calculate Subsolidus Phase Relations. American Mineralogist, 83(9/10): 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1998-9-1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dasgupta, R., Hirschmann, M. M., Smith, N. D., 2007. Partial Melting Experiments of Peridotite+CO2 at 3 GPa and Genesis of Alkalic Ocean Island Basalts. Journal of Petrology, 48(11): 2093–2124. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egm053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, F. A., Hirschmann, M. M., Humayun, M., 2011. The Composition of the Incipient Partial Melt of Garnet Peridotite at 3GPa and the Origin of OIB. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 308(3/4): 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, F. A., Tangeman, J. A., Tenner, T. J., et al., 2009. The Composition of KLB-1Peridotite. American Mineralogist, 94(1): 176–180. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2009.2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donovan, J. J., 2012. Probe for EPMA: Acquisition, Automation and Analysis. Enterprise Edition Probe Software Inc., EugeneGoogle Scholar
  8. Du, W., Li, L., Weidner, D. J., 2014. Experimental Observation on Grain Boundaries Affected by Partial Melting and Garnet Forming Phase Transition in KLB-1Peridotite. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 228: 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2013.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghiorso, M. S., Hirschmann, M. M., Reiners, P. W., et al., 2002. The pMELTS: A Revision of MELTS for Improved Calculation of Phase Relations and Major Element Partitioning Related to Partial Melting of the Mantle to 3GPa. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 3(5): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gc000217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghiorso, M. S., Sack, R. O., 1995. Chemical Mass Transfer in Magmatic Processes IV. A Revised and Internally Consistent Thermodynamic Model for the Interpolation and Extrapolation of Liquid-Solid Equilibria in Magmatic Systems at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 119(2/3): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004100050036Google Scholar
  11. Harmon, N., Forsyth, D. W., Weeraratne, D. S., 2009. Thickening of Young Pacific Lithosphere from High-Resolution Rayleigh Wave Tomography: A Test of the Conductive Cooling Model. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 278(1/2): 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.11.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herzberg, C., Gasparik, T., Sawamoto, H., 1990. Origin of Mantle Peridotite: Constraints from Melting Experiments to 16.5 GPa. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(B10): 15779–15803. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb095ib10p15779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herzberg, C., Raterron, P., Zhang, J. Z., 2000. New Experimental Observations on the Anhydrous Solidus for Peridotite KLB-1. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 1(11): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gc000089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herzberg, C., Zhang, J. Z., 1996. Melting Experiments on Anhydrous Peridotite KLB-1: Compositions of Magmas in the Upper Mantle and Transition Zone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 101(B4): 8271–8295. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb00170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirose, K., 1997. Melting Experiments on Lherzolite KLB-1 under Hydrous Conditions and Generation of High-Magnesian Andesitic Melts. Geology, 25(1): 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0042:meolku>2.3.co;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirose, K., Fei, Y. W., 2002. Subsolidus and Melting Phase Relations of Basaltic Composition in the Uppermost Lower Mantle. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 66(12): 2099–2108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7037(02)00847-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hirose, K., Kushiro, I., 1993. Partial Melting of Dry Peridotites at High Pressures: Determination of Compositions of Melts Segregated from Peridotite Using Aggregates of Diamond. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 114(4): 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(93)90077-MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirschmann, M. M., 2000. Mantle Solidus: Experimental Constraints and the Effects of Peridotite Composition. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 1(10): 1042. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gc000070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirschmann, M. M., 2010. Partial Melt in the Oceanic Low Velocity Zone. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 179(1/2): 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2009.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschmann, M. M., Ghiorso, M. S., Wasylenki, L. E., et al., 1998. Calculation of Peridotite Partial Melting from Thermodynamic Models of Minerals and Melts. I. Review of Methods and Comparison with Experiments. Journal of Petrology, 39(6): 1091–1115. https://doi.org/10.1093/petroj/39.6.1091Google Scholar
  21. Ito, K., Kennedy, G. C., 1967. Melting and Phase Relations in a Natural Peridotite to 40Kilobars. American Journal of Science, 265(6): 519–538. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.265.6.519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kato, T., Ringwood, A. E., Irifune, T., 1988. Constraints on Element Partition Coefficients between MgSiO3 Perovskite and Liquid Determined by Direct Measurements. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 90(1): 65–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lesher, C. E., Pickering-Witter, J., Baxter, G., et al., 2003. Melting of Garnet Peridotite: Effects of Capsules and Thermocouples, and Implications for the High-Pressure Mantle Solidus. American Mineralogist, 88(8/9): 1181–1189. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2003-8-901Google Scholar
  24. Lesher, C. E., Walker, D., 1988. Cumulate Maturation and Melt Migration in a Temperature Gradient. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 93(B9): 10295–10311. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb093ib09p10295Google Scholar
  25. Li, L., 2009. Studies of Mineral Properties at Mantle Condition Using Deformation Multi-Anvil Apparatus. Progress in Natural Science, 19(11): 1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2009.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, L., Weidner, D. J., 2013. Effect of Dynamic Melting on Acoustic Velocities in a Partially Molten Peridotite. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 222: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2013.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, L., Weidner, D. J., 2014. Detection of Melting by X-Ray Imaging at High Pressure. Review of Scientific Instruments, 85(6): 065104. https://doi.org/10.13039/100000001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Munro, R. G., 1997. Evaluated Material Properties for a Sintered Alpha-Alumina. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 80(8): 1919–1928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03074.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ohtani, E., 1979. Melting Relation of Fe2SiO4 up to about 200Kbar. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 27(3): 189–208. https://doi.org/10.4294/jpe1952.27.189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raterron, P., Merkel, S., Holyoke, C. W. III, 2013. Axial Temperature Gradient and Stress Measurements in the Deformation-DIA Cell Using Alumina Pistons. Review of Scientific Instruments, 84(4): 043906. https://doi.org/10.13039/100000015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, P. M., Asimow, P. D., 2005. Adiabat_1ph: A New Public Front-End to the MELTS, PMELTS, and PHMELTS Models. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 6(2): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gc000816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takahashi, E., 1986. Melting of a Dry Peridotite KLB-1 up to 14GPa: Implications on the Origin of Peridotitic Upper Mantle. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91(B9): 9367–9382. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb091ib09p09367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Takahashi, E., Shimazaki, T., Tsuzaki, Y., et al., 1993. Melting Study of a Peridotite KLB-1 to 6.5GPa, and the Origin of Basaltic Magmas. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 342(1663): 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1993.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker, D., DeLong, S. E., 1982. Soret Separation of Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt Magma. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 79(3): 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00371514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walter, M., 1998. Melting of Garnet Peridotite and the Origin of Komatiite and Depleted Lithosphere. Journal of Petrology, 39(1): 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/39.1.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weidner, D. J., Li, L., 2015. Kinetics of Melting in Peridotite from Volume Strain Measurements. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 246: 25–30. https://doi.org/10.13039/100000015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoshino, T., Takei, Y., Wark, D. A., et al., 2005. Grain Boundary Wetness of Texturally Equilibrated Rocks, with Implications for Seismic Properties of the Upper Mantle. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(B8): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jb003544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang, J. Z., Herzberg, C., 1994. Melting Experiments on Anhydrous Peridotite KLB-1 from 5.0 to 22.5GPa. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 99(B9): 17729–17742. https://doi.org/10.1029/94jb01406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhu, W., Gaetani, G. A., Fusseis, F., et al., 2011. Microtomography of Partially Molten Rocks: Three-Dimensional Melt Distribution in Mantle Peridotite. Science, 332(6025): 88–91. https://doi.org/10.13039/100006151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China University of Geosciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of GeochemistryChinese Academy of SciencesGuiyangChina
  2. 2.Mineral Physics Institute, Department of GeosciencesUniversity of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations