Abstract
The line tension, which characterizes the excess free energy per unit length of the boundary between different lipid membrane domains, is one of the factors that determines domain size and dynamics. Consequently, experimental methods and corresponding modeling studies related to the line tension continue to attract significant interest. Considering a planar binary lipid layer with two domains consisting of neutral and anionic lipids, one with a higher and one with a lower average surface charge density, we calculate the electrostatic contribution to the line tension at the domain boundary using mean-field electrostatics. The influence of lipid mobility in each phase is studied through solutions of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation for different sets of boundary conditions that include the limiting cases of fixing the local surface charge density or surface potential, and the intermediate case of allowing the lipids to migrate subject to a demixing entropy penalty. In addition to our numerical results, we derive simple analytic expressions for the electrostatic contribution to the line tension in the linearized Debye–Hückel limit. We find the electrostatic contribution to the line tension to be negative with magnitudes on the order of piconewton close to physiological conditions. Because this is comparable to experimentally reported values of the total line tension, we conclude that electrostatic interactions generally provide an important contribution to the total line tension between differently charged domains in lipid bilayers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Singer, S., Nicolson, G.: The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 175(4023), 720 (1972)
Deamer, D., Dworkin, J.P., Sandford, S.A., Bernstein, M.P., Allamandola, L.J.: The first cell membranes. Astrobiology 2(4), 371 (2002)
Alberts, B., Bray, D., Hopkin, K., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., Walter, P.: Essential Cell Biology. Garland Science, New York (2013)
van Meer, G.: Cellular lipidomics. EMBO J. 24(18), 3159 (2005)
Jacobson, K., Mouritsen, O.G., Anderson, R.G.: Lipid rafts: at a crossroad between cell biology and physics. Nat. Cell Biol. 9(1), 7 (2007)
Lingwood, D., Simons, K.: Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327(5961), 46 (2010)
Simons, K., Vaz, W.L.: Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes 1. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 269 (2004)
García-Sáez, A.J., Chiantia, S., Schwille, P.: Effect of line tension on the lateral organization of lipid membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 282(46), 33537 (2007)
Vance, J.E., Vance, D.E.: Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)
Veatch, S.L., Keller, S.L.: Miscibility phase diagrams of giant vesicles containing sphingomyelin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(14), 148101 (2005)
Baumgart, T., Hess, S.T., Webb, W.W.: Imaging coexisting fluid domains in biomembrane models coupling curvature and line tension. Nature 425(6960), 821 (2003)
Chiantia, S., Kahya, N., Ries, J., Schwille, P.: Effects of ceramide on liquid-ordered domains investigated by simultaneous AFM and FCS. Biophys. J. 90(12), 4500 (2006)
Mangiarotti, A., Caruso, B., Wilke, N.: Lipid monolayers at the air–water interface: a tool for understanding electrostatic interactions and rheology in biomembranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1838(7), 1823 (2014)
Dietrich, C., Bagatolli, L., Volovyk, Z., Thompson, N., Levi, M., Jacobson, K., Gratton, E.: Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes. Biophys. J. 80(3), 1417 (2001)
Kuzmin, P.I., Akimov, S.A., Chizmadzhev, Y.A., Zimmerberg, J., Cohen, F.S.: Line tension and interaction energies of membrane rafts calculated from lipid splay and tilt. Biophys. J. 88(2), 1120 (2005)
Bischof, A.A., Wilke, N.: Molecular determinants for the line tension of coexisting liquid phases in monolayers. Chem. Phys. Lipids 165(7), 737 (2012)
Wilke, N.: Lipid monolayers at the air–water interface: a tool for understanding electrostatic interactions and rheology in biomembranes. Adv. Planar Lipid Bilayers Liposomes 20, 51 (2014)
Lipowsky, R.: Budding of membranes induced by intramembrane domains. J. Phys. II 2(10), 1825 (1992)
Vind-Kezunovic, D., Nielsen, C.H., Wojewodzka, U., Gniadecki, R.: Line tension at lipid phase boundaries regulates formation of membrane vesicles in living cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1778(11), 2480 (2008)
Hutchison, J.B., Weis, R.M., Dinsmore, A.D.: Change of line tension in phase-separated vesicles upon protein binding. Langmuir 28(11), 5176 (2012)
Dumas, F., Sperotto, M.M., Lebrun, M.C., Tocanne, J.F., Mouritsen, O.G.: Molecular sorting of lipids by bacteriorhodopsin in dilauroylphosphatidylcholine/distearoylphosphatidylcholine lipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 73(4), 1940 (1997)
Mbamala, E.C., Ben-Shaul, A., May, S.: Domain formation induced by the adsorption of charged proteins on mixed lipid membranes. Biophys. J. 88(3), 1702 (2005)
Towles, K.B., Dan, N.: Line tension and coalescence in heterogeneous membranes. Langmuir 23(26), 13053 (2007)
van Meer, G., de Kroon, A.I.: Lipid map of the mammalian cell. J. Cell Sci. 124(1), 5 (2011)
Baciu, C.L., May, S.: Stability of charged, mixed lipid bilayers: effect of electrostatic coupling between the monolayers. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16(26), S2455 (2004)
Doeven, M.K., Folgering, J.H., Krasnikov, V., Geertsma, E.R., van den Bogaart, G., Poolman, B.: Distribution, lateral mobility and function of membrane proteins incorporated into giant unilamellar vesicles. Biophys. J. 88(2), 1134 (2005)
Davis, H.T.: Statistical Mechanics of Phases, Interfaces, and Thin Films. Wiley-VCH, New York (1996)
Andelman, D.: Electrostatic properties of membranes: the Poisson–Boltzmann theory. Handb. Biol. Phys. 1, 603 (1995)
Kontorovich, M.I., Lebedev, N.N.: On the one method of solution for some problems in diffraction theory and related problems. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 8(10), 1192 (1938)
Kang, K.H., Kang, I.S., Lee, C.M.: Electrostatic contribution to line tension in a wedge-shaped contact region. Langmuir 19(22), 9334 (2003)
Tian, A., Johnson, C., Wang, W., Baumgart, T.: Line tension at fluid membrane domain boundaries measured by micropipette aspiration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(20), 208102 (2007)
May, S.: Curvature elasticity and thermodynamic stability of electrically charged membranes. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 8314 (1996)
Kontorovich, M.I., Lebedev, N.N.: On the application of inversion formulae to the solution of some electrodynamics problems. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 9(6), 729 (1939)
Fowkes, N., Hood, M.: Surface tension effects in a wedge. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 51(4), 553 (1998)
Duplantier, B.: Can one hear the thermodynamics of a (rough) colloid? Phys. Rev. Lett. 66(12), 1555 (1991)
Acknowledgments
G. V. B. acknowledges a doctoral scholarship from CAPES Foundation/Brazil Ministry of Education (Grant No. 9466/13-4). M. A. B. acknowledges the Swiss National Science Foundation for an International Short Visit travel grant to North Dakota State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Calculation of \(\varLambda _{el}\) using the Kontorovich–Lebedev transformation
Appendix: Calculation of \(\varLambda _{el}\) using the Kontorovich–Lebedev transformation
We solve the linearized Poisson–Boltzmann equation expressed in polar coordinates r and \(\varphi \),
for the dimensionless electrostatic potential \(\varPsi =\varPsi (r,\varphi )\) within the region \(0 \le r \le \infty \) and \(0 \le \varphi \le \pi \) depicted in Fig. 4. Let us first consider the mixed case where one phase is kept at constant charge density \(\sigma _1\) and the other at fixed and constant dimensionless surface potential \(\tilde{\varPsi }^{(b)}_2\). When expressed in polar coordinates, the boundary conditions specified in case II above read
and \(\varPsi (r\rightarrow \infty ,\varphi )=0\). The first relation fixes the surface charge density \(\sigma _1=-e\bar{\phi }_1/a\) of phase 1, and the second relation specifies the surface potential \(\tilde{\varPhi }_2^{(b)}=k_BT\tilde{\varPsi }_2^{(b)}/e\) of phase 2. A convenient method to solve Eq. 18 and to calculate \(\varLambda _{el}\) employs the Kontorovich–Lebedev transformation [29, 30, 33, 34] \(\varPsi (r,\varphi ) \rightarrow \varUpsilon (\lambda ,\varphi )\), defined through
and its corresponding back-transformation
where \(K_{i \lambda }(x)\) is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order \(\lambda \) and i is the imaginary unit. We note that the same method has been used previously by Duplantier [35] and Kang et al. [30] for wedge-like geometries and boundary conditions of type I (yet not for type II). When expressed in terms of \(\varUpsilon =\varUpsilon (\lambda ,\varphi )\), Eq. 18 reads
and the two boundary conditions in Eq. 19 become
with \(\tilde{\varPsi }_1^{(b)}=-4 \pi l_B l_D \bar{\phi }_1/a\). The condition \(\varPsi (r\rightarrow \infty ,\varphi )=0\) is consistently fulfilled due to the property \(K_n(x \rightarrow \infty )=0\) for all choices of n. The solution of Eq. 22 subject to the boundary conditions in Eqs. 23 and 24 is
Transforming back from \(\varUpsilon (\lambda ,\varphi )\) to \(\varPsi (r,\varphi )\) according to Eq. 21 gives rise to
From the solution \(\varPsi (r,\varphi )\) in Eq. 26 we calculate the electrostatic line tension \(\varLambda _{el}\) as the excess free energy per unit length
Instead of using \(\sigma _1\), it is convenient to express the fixed surface charge density in phase 1 in terms of the corresponding surface potential \(\tilde{\varPsi }^{(b)}_1=4 \pi l_B l_D \sigma _1/e\) far away from the boundary between the phases (that is \(\tilde{\varPsi }^{(b)}_1=\varPsi (r \rightarrow \infty ,\varphi =\pi )\)). From Eq. 26 we can compute both \(\varPsi (r,\pi )\) and \((\partial \varPsi /\partial \varphi )_{\varphi =0}\) and use these results to calculate the excess free energy according to Eq. 27. This leads to the expression for \(\varLambda _{el}\) as specified in Eq. 17.
We now proceed to determine the surface charge induced on the phase kept at constant potential. Defining this charge density by \(\sigma _2^{ind}\), we take the first angular derivative of Eq. 26 at phase 2 (i.e., at \(\varphi =0\)) and find:
We note that the form how the \(\lambda \) integrals appear in this equation does not allow a direct analytical solution. However, we can compute the effective charge per unit length on phase 2 using
where the first term accounts for the induced charge density and the second one subtracts the charge in the bulk of the phase (i.e., far away from the boundary \(r=0\)). Then, inserting Eq. 28 into 29 and performing the r integration prior to the \(\lambda \) integration, we find
The expression obtained Eq. 30 implies that for any \(\tilde{\varPsi }_2<\tilde{\varPsi }_1\), charges on phase 1 will induce a positive charge on phase 2 (recall that we only have negative and neutral lipids in the system). This fact explains why the values obtained for the line tension can approach negative values of large magnitude when \(\bar{\phi }_2\) decreases.
When each of the two phases carries a fixed surface charge density (\(\sigma _1\) in phase 1 and \(\sigma _2\) in phase 2, as specified in boundary condition type I above), Eq. 19 reads
The derivation of \(\varLambda _{el}\) follows the same steps as for the mixed boundary conditions, leading to the final result specified in Eq. 16.
We note that the result in Eq. 16 also appears as a special case of calculating \(\varLambda _{el}\) in a wedge-like geometry where the wedge subtends an angle \(\alpha \). For this case, \(\varLambda _{el}\) is given by
The two functions \(M_1(\alpha )\) and \(M_2(\alpha )\) have been calculated previously by Kang et al. [30]
and
with \(c=0\). We note a typo in the work of Kang et al. [30], who state Eq. 34 with \(c=1\). For \(\alpha =\pi \) we find \(M_1(\alpha ) =0\) and \(M_2(\pi )=1/(2 \pi )\), and Eq. 32 becomes the same as Eq. 16.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bossa, G.V., Brown, M.A., Bohinc, K. et al. Modeling the electrostatic contribution to the line tension between lipid membrane domains using Poisson–Boltzmann theory. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math 8, 101–110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12572-015-0158-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12572-015-0158-6