Skip to main content
Log in

Commercial MEMS case studies: market drivers, designs, materials and processes

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MEMS has finally become the “disruptive” technology that many predicted 30 years ago. Why did it take so long? The simple fact is that MEMS devices are seldom discrete products. Instead, they enable “disruptive” new functions in higher-level products. It takes time to recognize the value of these capabilities and to develop the higher-level products. Market maturation, technical expertise and a willingness to take financial risk fueled the recent MEMS industry growth. This paper uses examples from the past and present to identify technical and business characteristics that lead to successful high volume MEMS products. These lessons are then projected forward to identify emerging high volume MEMS opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Compound Annual Growth Rate.

References

  1. Angell, J.B., Terry, S.C., Barth, P.W.: Silicon micromechanical devices. Sci. Am. 248(4), 44–50 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin, J.R.: Surface characteristics of integrated MEMS in high volume production. In: Hsu, S.M., Ying, Z.C. (eds.) Nanotribology: Critical Assessment and Research Needs, chap. 14. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin, J.R.: High volume manufacturing and field stability of MEMS products. In: Bhushan, B. (ed.) Handbook of Nanotechnology, chap. 55, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, J.R.: Process for wafer level treatment to reduce stiction and passivate micromachined surfaces and compounds used therefor. U.S. Patent 7,364,942, 29 April 2008

  5. Martin, J.R.: Low oxygen assembly of glass sealed packages. U.S. Patent 6,358,771, 19 March 2002

  6. Potin, M.: Motion sensing applications, new opportunities for development of 3-axis accelerometers? Micronews 68, 6–7 (2008). Yole Développement SARL, Lyon April

  7. Lindenberger, W.S., Poteat, T.L., West, J.E.: Integrated electroacoustic transducer with built-in bias. U.S. Patent 4,524,247, 18 June 1985

  8. Baumhauer, J.C., Hershey, H.J., Poteat, T.L.: Integrated electroacoustic transducer. U. S. Patent 4,533,795, 6 Aug 1985

  9. Busch-Vishniac, I.J., Lindenberger, W.S., Lynch, W.T., Poteat, T.O.: Integrated capacitive transducer. U. S. Patent 4,558,184, 10 Dec 1985

  10. Martin, J.: Wafer capping of MEMS with fab-friendly metals. In: Proceedings of SPIE, Reliability, Packaging, Testing and Characterization of MEMS/MOEMS VI, January 23–24, vol. 6463 (2007), p. 64630

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Martin.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12572-011-0035-x

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, J. Commercial MEMS case studies: market drivers, designs, materials and processes. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math 2, 23–27 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12572-010-0013-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12572-010-0013-8

Keywords

Navigation