Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Linking system perspectives with user perspectives to identify adoption barriers to food security innovations for smallholder farmers – evidence from rural Tanzania

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Food insecurity remains a persistent problem, affecting one-third of Tanzania’s population. Mutually reinforcing factors that make the situation more acute include high human population growth combined with the impacts of climate change affecting agricultural productivity. This situation explains why the development and implementation of solutions to improve food security in Tanzania continues to receive substantial attention from scholars, NGOs, practitioners, government and associated bodies. Among researchers and practitioners, innovation is discussed as one possible and widely accepted pathway for improving food security. However, evidence shows that the adoption of innovations that have a potential to improve food security status, such as improved seed, fertilizer, better cooking stoves or mechanization, remains low in Tanzania. To enhance understanding about why innovations are not always successfully adopted, we took an innovation system perspective that included three analytical steps: (1) description of system arrangements on a meso- and macro level, (2) the description of farmers’ motivation for adoption or rejection on a micro-level, and (3) an integration of findings from both levels to identify entry points for purposeful intervention. This paper applied that framework to the empirical examples of two innovations, improved cooking stoves (ICS) and fertilizer micro-dosing (FMD) combined with improved soil and crop management techniques for small-scale subsistence-farmer groups in Tanzania. These interventions were part of the Trans-SEC research project. We show how system constraints, such as hampered communication and interaction across levels, had an impact on the way innovations could be implemented by farmers and how this leads to specific adoption decisions, given conditions of not-knowing or insufficient information. From these two case studies we conclude that most technical based innovations are associated with process aspects (in the case of fertilizer micro-dosing) or social aspects (with stoves).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, M. F., Harvey, D. R., & Palis, F. G. (2018). Food security and the environment: Interdisciplinary research to increase productivity while exercising environmental conservation. Global Food Security, 16, 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akroyd, S., & Smith, L. (2007). Review of public spending to agriculture, a joint DFID / World Bank study. UK: Oxford Policy Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alarcon, D., & Bodouroglou, C. (2011). Agricultural innovation for food security and environmental sustainability in the context of the recent economic crisis: Why a gender perspective? World Economic and Social Survey, 2011.

  • Ashley, J. M. (2016). Food security in the developing world. London, UK: Academic Press, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assefa, A., Waters-Bayer, A., Finchman, R. & Mudahara, M. (2009). Comparison of frameworks for studying Grassroot innovation: Agricultural innovation systems (AIS) and agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS). In Sanginga et al. (Eds.) (2009). Innovation Africa Enriching Farmers Livelihoods. Earthscan. London, UK.

  • Barham, J., & Chitemi, C. (2009). Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance: Lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania. Food Policy, 34, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensch, G., & Perters, J. (2015). The intensive margin of technology adoption- experimental evidence on improved cooking stoves in rural Senegal. Journal of Health Economics, 42, 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokelmann, W., Doernberg, A., Schwerdtner, W., Kuntosch, A., Busse, M., König, B., Siebert, R., Koschatzky, K., & Stahlecker, T. (2012). Sektorstudie zur Untersuchung des Innovationssystems der deutschen Landwirtschaft, doi, 10.18452/13522.

  • Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (Eds.). (2010). Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan. Washington DC: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, A. (2010). Kilimo kwanza: A new start for agriculture in Tanzania? Institute of local government studies. UK: Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2010). Agriculture for development in sub-Saharan Africa: An update. AfJARE, 5(1), 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deveaux, A., Velasco, C., & Jager, M. (2016). Integrating agricultural innovation and inclusive value chains development. In A. Devaux, M. Torero, J. Donovan, & D. Horton (Eds.), Innovation for inclusive value-chain development: Successes and challenges. IFPRI. Washington DC: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diyamett, B.D., Ngowi, P. & Mutambala, M. (2012). Impact of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on local technological capabilities in the Agricultural Sector in Tanzania. STIPRO Policy Brief, Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Organization No.3, 2012. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

  • Duhaime, G., & Godmaire, A. (2002). The conditions of sustainable food security. An integrated conceptual framework. Pimatziwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 1(2), 87–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidt, C. M., Hickey, G. M., & Vurtis, M. A. (2012). Knowledge integration and the adaption of new agricultural technologies. Kenyan perspectives. Food Security, 4(3), 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, Evidence and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltham. USA: Northampton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, P. G. H. (1997). Lecture series: Knowledge for. Development Retrieved from http://ocw.unu.edu/maastricht-economic-and-social-research-and-training-centre-on-innovation-and-technology/knowledge-for-development/lectures/.

  • Esterhuizen, D., Schutte, C. S. L., & DuToit, A. S. A. (2012). Knowledge creation processes as critical enablers for innovation. International Journal of Information Management, 32, 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (2003). Innovation: A guide to the literature. Paper presented at the Workshop: “The many guises of Innovation: What we have learnt and where we are heading”. Ottawa, Canada, October 2003.

  • FAO (2008). An introduction to the basic concepts of food security. The EC-FAO food security Programme is funded by the European Union and implemented by FAO. Available from: www.foodsec.org/docs/concepts_guide.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Foran, T., Butler, J. R. A., Wanjura, W. J., Hall, A., Carter, L., & Carberry, P. S. (2014). Taking complexity in food systems seriously: An interdisciplinary analysis. World Development, 61, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graef, F., Sieber, S., Mutabazi, K., Asch, F., Biesalski, H. K., Bitegeko, J., Bokelmann, W., Bruentrup, M., Dietric, O., et al. (2014). Framework for participatory food security research in rural food value chains. Global Food Security, 3(1), 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grochowska, R. (2014). Specificity of food security concept as a wicked problem. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, B4, 823–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. (2007). Challenges to strengthening agricultural innovation systems: Where do we go from here? UNU-merit working papers. The Netherlands: Maastricht.

  • Hall, A., Sulaiman, V. R., Clark, N., & Yogananda, B. (2003). From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: An innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural Systems, 78, 213–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haug, R., & Hella, J. (2013). The art of balancing food security: Securing availability and affordability of food in Tanzania. Global Food Security, 5, 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heemskerk, W., Lema, N., Guindo, D., Schouten, C., Semgalawe, S., Verkuijl, H., Piters, B.d. S., & Penninkhoff, P. (2004). A guide to demand driven agricultural research. The client oriented research approach: Rural services delivery for agricultural development. In KIT publishers. The Netherlands: Amsterdam.

  • Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, F., Stuiver, M., Beersm, P. J., & Kok, K. (2013). The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, 115, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Leeuwis, C., Nederlof, E. Z., Röling, N., Sakyi-Dawson, W., Traoré, M., & van Huis, A. (2012). An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems, 108, 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jama, B., Kiwia, A., & Mutegi, J. (2011). Innovative systems to reverse soil degradation and improve water Management for Enhanced Food Security: Experiences from African countries. Background paper. In World economic and social survey http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_bg_papers/bp_wess2011_jama.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaburire, L., & Ruvuga, S. (2006). Networking for agricultural innovation: the MVIWATA national network of farmers’ groups in Tanzania. In: Wennink, B. & Heemskerk, W. (eds.) Farmers’ organizations and agricultural innovation: case studies from Benin, Rwanda and Tanzania. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute (KIT). pp. 79–86. http://www.kit.nl/net/KIT_Publicaties_output/showfile.aspx?e=913. Accessed 22 July 2011.

  • Khandelwal, M., Hill Jr., M. E., Greenough, P., Anthony, J., Quill, M., Linderman, M., & Udaykumar, H. S. (2017). Why have improved cook-stove initiatives in India failed? World Development, 92, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klerkx et al. (2012). Evolution of system approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and inter-ventions. In Darnhofer, I.,Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds.) (2012). Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, The Netherlands.

  • Laborde, D., Tokgoz, S. & Torero, M. (2016). Long term drivers of food security and nutrition. FOODSECURE Working. IFPRI Discussion Papers 01531. Washington, D.C., USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/130336

  • Lamnek, S. (1998). Gruppendiskussion. Weinheim, Germany: Theorie und Praxis. Beltz. Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latjesteijn, H. C. v., & Rabbinge, R. (2012). Wicked problems in sustainable agriculture and food security. The TransForum experience. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(Special Issue B), 89–−94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (2005). National Innovation Systems Analytical Concept and development tool. For DRUID-Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark., (June 2005).

  • Lundvall, B.-Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries. Building domestic capabilities in a global setting. In Edward Elgar. UK: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Concepts, issues and analysis of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: A framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 14(1–2), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matunga, B.N. (2008). Causes of food insecurity and coping strategies in Tanzania: A case of smallholder farmers in Chamwino district. Dissertation. Morogoro: Sokoine University of Agriculture. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/425. Accessed 08 May 2015.

  • Mwalukasa, N. (2012). Agricultural information sources used for climate change adaptation in Tanzania. Emerald Library Review, 62(4/5), 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwinuka, L., Mutabazi, K. D., Graef, F., Sieber, S., Makindara, J., Kimaro, A., & Uckert, G. (2017). Simulated willingness of farmers to adopt fertilizers micro-dosing and rainwater harvesting technologies in semi-arid and sub-humid farming systems in Tanzania. Food Security, 9(6), 1237–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederlof, S., Gildemacher, P., Heemskerk, W. & van der Lee, F. (2011). Facilitation of innovation: Experiences of RIU innovation platforms in Tanzania, Rwanda and Zambia. Development, Policy and Practice. Royal Tropical Institute. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Palotti, A. (2008). Decentralizing power or spreading poverty? Review of African Political Economy, 116, 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piprek, G. (2007). Linking with saving and credit cooperatives (SACCOS) to expand financial access in rural Tanzania: A case study of CRDB Bank in Tanzania. FAO, 2007.

  • PROLINNOVA. (2012). Farmers` direct access to R&D resources accelerates local innovation. PROLINNOVA Policy Brief. 2012. The Netherlands: Leusden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przyborski, A., & Wohlrab-Sahr, M. (2014). Qualitative Sozialforschung. In Ein Arbeitsbuch. Germany: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyborn, R., & Woodhill, J. (Eds.). (2014). Dynamics of rural innovation. The Netherlands: A primer for emerging professionals. Royal Tropical Institute. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajalahti, R. (2012). Sourcebook overview and user guide. In World Bank. Agricultural Innovation systems. An Investment Sourcebook. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (Fifth ed.). New York, USA: Free Press.

  • Röling, N. (2009). Conceptual and Methodological Developments in Innovation. In: Sanginga et al. (Eds.) (2009): Innovation Africa Enriching Farmers’ Livelihoods. London: Earthscan Publishers.

  • Röling, N., Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Nederlof, S., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Traoré, M., & Huis, A.v. (2012). Diagnosing the scope for innovation: Linking smallholder practices and institutional context. Introducing the special Issue. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 60-63, 1–6.

  • Sanginga, P.C., Waters-Bayer, A., Kaaria, S. Njuki, J. & Wettasinha, C. (2009). Innovation Africa: Beyond rhetoric to praxis. In Sanginga et al. (Eds.) (2009). Innovation Africa Enriching Farmers` Livelihoods. Earthscan Publishers, London, UK.

  • Sieber, S., Graef, F. Amjath-Babu, T.S., Mutabazi, K.D., Tumbo, S.D. et al. (2017). Trans-SEC’s food security research in Tanzania: Principles, research models and assumptions. Food Security, 9(6), 1147−1155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0745-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, D. J., Ekboir, J., & Davis, K. (2009). The art and science of innovation systems inquiry. Implications to sub-Saharan African agriculture. Technology in Society, 31, 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista (2016). https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/159204/umfrage/prognose-zur-bevoelkerungsentwicklung-in-afrika-bis-2050/ Accessed, 23.09.2016.

  • Stephenson, G. (2003). The somewhat flawed theoretical foundation of the extension service. Journal of Extension, 41(4), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaans, K., Cullen, B. Rooyen, A.V., Adekunle, A., Ngwenya, H. Lema, Z. & Nederloof, S. (2016). Dealing with critical challenges in African Innovation Platforms: lessons for facilitation. In: Deveaus, A., Torero, M. Donovan, J. and Horton, D. (2016): Innovation for Inclusive Value Chain Development Success and Challenges. IFPRI, Washington DC, USA.

  • Temu, A.E., Nyange, D., Mattee, A.Z. & Kashasha, L.K. (2005). Assessing rural services, infrastructure and their impact on agricultural production, Marketing and Food security in Tanzania. Final donor report of a research project funded under IFPRI Eastern Africa. http://tanzaniagateway.org/docs/AssessingRuralServicesIandInfrastructureonAgriculturalProduction_Tanzania.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Uckert, G., Hafner, J., Hoffmann, H., Kimaro, A., Sereya, O., & Sieber, S. (2017). Farmer innovation driven by needs and understanding: Building the capacities of farmer groups for improved cooking stove construction and continued adoption. Environmental Research Letters, 12, 125001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for a sustainable development. Accessed, 11(05), 2017 http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N. (2014). Systems thinking on intensification and sustainability: System boundaries, processes and dimensions. Environmental Sustainability, 8, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • URT (2011). United republic of Tanzania, Tanzania Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan TAFSIP. Main Document, October 2011, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

  • USAID. (2013). Livelihood and food security conceptual framework. Livelihood and Food Security Technical Assistance (LIFT). Washington DC: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • WFP (2012). Comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis. Tanzania 2012. https://www.wfp.org/content/tanzania-comprehensive-food-security-vulnerability-analysis-september-2013

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) for funding of the Trans-SEC project. We thank the project team in Tanzania for organization of fieldwork, N. Laizer for translation and I. J. Kalogho and B. Lyamuya for their excellent facilitation of farmer group interviews on-site.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Sciences, Department for Horticultural Production and IRI THESys, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany

    Anett Kuntosch & Bettina König

Authors
  1. Anett Kuntosch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bettina König
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anett Kuntosch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuntosch, A., König, B. Linking system perspectives with user perspectives to identify adoption barriers to food security innovations for smallholder farmers – evidence from rural Tanzania. Food Sec. 10, 881–896 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0821-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0821-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation