Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 369–379 | Cite as

Impacts of improved maize varieties in Nigeria: ex-post assessment of productivity and welfare outcomes

  • Tahirou Abdoulaye
  • Tesfamicheal Wossen
  • Bola Awotide
Original Paper

Abstract

Investment in agricultural research and development is an important intervention for improving crop productivity and household welfare in most developing countries where agriculture is the main source of livelihoods. This paper uses nationally representative plot- and household-level data from the major maize producing regions of Nigeria to assess the impacts of adoption of improved maize varieties on maize yield and household welfare outcomes. The paper employed an endogenous switching regression approach to control for both observed and unobserved sources of heterogeneity between adopters and non-adopters. Adoption of improved maize varieties increased maize grain yield by 574 kg/ha and per-capita total expenditure by US$ 77 (US$ 0.21/day). We found that the incidence of poverty among adopters would have been higher by 6% without adoption of the improved varieties. These findings underscore that investments and policy measures to increase and sustain the adoption of improved maize cultivars are critical for improving the productivity of maize in Nigeria and reducing poverty.

Keywords

Adoption Improved maize varieties Nigeria Productivity Poverty 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was partly funded through the CGIAR Research Program on Maize (Maize-CRP) and a CIMMYT and IITA project, Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abate, T., Shiferaw, B., Menkir, A., Wegary, D., Kebede, Y., Tesfaye, K., & Keno, T. (2015). Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia. Food Security, 7(5), 965–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abate, T., Fisher, M., Abdoulaye, T., Kassie, G. T., Lunduka, R., Marenya, P., & Asnake, W. (2017). Characteristics of maize cultivars in Africa: how modern are they and how many do smallholder farmers grow? Agriculture and Food Security, 6, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdoulaye, T., & Sanders, J. H. (2005). Stages and determinants of fertilizer use in semiarid African agriculture: the Niger experience. Agricultural Economics, 32, 167−179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alene, A. D. (2010). Productivity growth and the effects of R&D in African agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 41, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alene, A. D., & Manyong, V. M. (2007). The effects of education on agricultural productivity under traditional and improved technology in northern Nigeria: an endogenous switching regression analysis. Empirical Economics, 32(1), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alene, A. D., Manyong, V. M., Tollens, E., & Abele, S. (2007). Targeting agricultural research based on potential impacts on poverty reduction: strategic program priorities by agro-ecological zone in Nigeria. Food Policy, 32(3), 394–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amare, M., Asfaw, S., & Shiferaw, B. (2012). Welfare impacts of maize-pigeonpea intensification in Tanzania. Agricultural Economics, 43(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asfaw, S., Kassie, M., Simtowe, F., & Leslie, L. (2012). Poverty reduction effects of agricultural technology adoption: a micro-evidence from rural Tanzania. Journal of Development Studies, 48(9), 1288–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bezu, S., Kassie, G., Shiferaw, B., & Gilber, J. R. (2014). Impact of improved maize adoption on welfare of farm households in Malawi: a panel data analysis. World Development, 59, 120–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bold, T., Kaizzi, K. C., Svensson, J., & Yanagizawa-Drott, D. (2017). Lemon technologies and adoption: measurement, theory and evidence from agricultural markets in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(3), 1055–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dercon, S., & Christiaensen, L. (2011). Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Development Economics, 96(2), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorosh, P., & Thurlow, J. (2018). Beyond agriculture versus non-agriculture: decomposing sectoral growth–poverty linkages in five African countries. World Development.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.014.
  13. FAOSTAT. (2016). Statistical database. Retrieved on 19 August 2016 from: http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/*/E.
  14. Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ilukor, J. Kilic, T., Stevenson, J., Gourlay, S., Kosmowski, F., Kilian, A., Serumaga, J., & Asea, G. (2017). Blowing in the wind: the quest for accurate crop variety identification in field research, with an application to maize in Uganda. Paper presented at the CGIAR SPIA Conference on the Impact of Agricultural research: Rigorous Evidence for Policy, Nairobi, July 2017.Google Scholar
  16. Karanja, D. D., Renkow, M., & Crawford, E. W. (2003). Welfare effects of maize technologies in marginal and high potential regions of Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 29, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., & Muricho, G. (2011). Agricultural technology, crop income, and poverty alleviation in Uganda. World Development, 39(10), 1784–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kostandini, G., La Rovere, R., & Abdoulaye, T. (2013). Potential impacts of increasing average yields and reducing maize yield variability in Africa. Food Policy, 43, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lokshin, M., & Sajaia, Z. (2004). Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching regression models. Stata Journal, 4, 282–289.Google Scholar
  20. Maddalla, G. S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magrini, E., & Vigani, M. (2016). Technology adoption and the multiple dimensions of food security: the case of maize in Tanzania. Food Security, 8(4), 707–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mason, N. M., & Smale, M. (2013). Impacts of subsidized hybrid seed on indicators of economic well-being among smallholder maize growers in Zambia. Agricultural Economics, 44, 659–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NACGRAB (National Centre for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology). (2016). Varieties released catalogue. Retrieved on 15 August 2016 from http://www.nacgrab.gov.ng/images/Varieties_Released_Catalogue.pdf.
  24. NBSN (National Bureau of Statistics Nigeria). (2010). Nigeria poverty profile 2010. Retrieved on 15 August 2016 from: http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/pdfuploads/Nigeria%20Poverty%20Profile%202010.pdf.
  25. Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010). Microeconomic approaches to development: schooling, learning, and growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shiferaw, B., Kebede, T. A., & You, Z. (2008). Technology adoption under seed access constraints and the economic impacts of improved pigeonpea varieties in Tanzania. Agricultural Economics, 39, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shiferaw, B., Kassie, M., Jaleta, M., & Yirga, C. (2014). Adoption of improved wheat varieties and impacts on household food security in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 44, 272–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suri, T. (2011). Selection and comparative advantage in technology adoption. Econometrica, 79(1), 159–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. USA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wossen, T., Berger, T., & Di Falco, S. (2015). Social capital, risk preference and adoption of improved farm land management practices in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 46(1), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wossen, T., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A., Feleke, S., Gilbert, J. R., Manyong, V., & Awotide, B. A. (2017a). Productivity and welfare effects of Nigeria's e-voucher-based input subsidy program. World Development, 97, 251–265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Wossen, T., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A., Feleke, S., Menkir, A., & Manyong, V. (2017b). Measuring the impacts of adaptation strategies to drought stress: the case of drought tolerant maize varieties. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 106–113.Google Scholar
  33. Wossen, T., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A., Nguimkeu, P., Feleke, S., Haile, M., Rabbi, I., & Manyong, V. (2018). Measuring the productivity impacts of technology adoption in the presence of misclassification. Forthcoming, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Google Scholar
  34. Zeng, D., Alwang, J., Norton, G. W., Shiferaw, B., Jaleta, M., & Yirga, C. (2015). Ex post impacts of improved maize varieties on poverty in rural Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 46(4), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature and International Society for Plant Pathology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)IbadanNigeria
  2. 2.IITAAbujaNigeria
  3. 3.World Vegetable CenterBamakoMali

Personalised recommendations