Food Security

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 323–338 | Cite as

How diversified is cropping in Malawi? Patterns, determinants and policy implications

Original Paper

Abstract

Micro- and macroeconomic evidence suggest that the promotion of agricultural diversification in agriculture-based developing countries is beneficial. At the microeconomic level, increased agricultural diversification promotes human nutrition and raises household incomes, while allowing farmers to adapt to the challenges posed by climate change. Using Malawi as a case study, we analyzed the recent patterns and determinants of farm level crop diversification in order to better understand how policies impact on diversification and how they can be better formulated or implemented to effectively promote diversification. The study used descriptive and econometric approaches to study crop diversification. Data from two nationally representative household surveys, which covered cropping seasons in 2004/05 and 2010/11, show that crop diversification has deteriorated nationally in different Agricultural Development Divisions (ADDs), although beneficiaries of the widely-implemented Farm Input Subsidy Program (FISP) have become more diversified. The study also found that crop diversification varies significantly across agro-ecological zones. Results also indicate that deliberately targeted policies lead to more commercially orientated crop diversification. We conclude that further crop diversification could be promoted among different types of farmers with the aim of contributing to economic growth, risk reduction, and nutrition security in Malawi.

Keywords

Crop diversification Random effects tobit Simpson index Malawi 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aberman, N., Meerman, J., & Benson, T. (2015). Mapping the linkages between agriculture, food security, and nutrition in Malawi. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee, G. D., & Banerjee, S. (2015). Crop diversification: An exploratory analysis. In M. Gosh, D. Sarkar, & C. Roy (Eds.), Diversification of agriculture in eastern India, India studies in business and economics (pp. 37–57). New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Benin, S., Smale, M., Pender, J., Gebremedhin, B., & Ehui, S. (2004). The economic determinants of cereal crop diversity on farms in the Ethiopian highlands. Agricultural Economics, 31(2–3), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birthal, P. S., Joshi, P. K., Roy, D., & Thorat, A. (2013). Diversification in Indian agriculture toward high-value crops: The role of small farmers. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(1), 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bittinger, A. K. (2010). Crop diversification and technology adoption: The role of market isolation in Ethiopia. USA: Montana State University Retrieved from https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/928/BittingerA0510.pdf?sequence=1.Google Scholar
  6. Breisinger, C., Thomas, M., & Thurlow, J. (2009). Social accounting matrices and multiplier analysis: An introduction with exercises. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Chibwana, C. (2013). Measuring the impacts of Malawi’s farm input subsidy programme. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(2), 132–147.Google Scholar
  8. Chibwana, C., Shively, G., Fisher, M., Jumbe, C., & Masters, W. A. (2013). Measuring the impacts of Malawi’s farm input subsidy programme. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(2), 132–147.Google Scholar
  9. Chirwa, E. W. (2005). Adoption of fertiliser and hybrid seeds by smallholder maize farmers in southern Malawi. Development Southern Africa, 22(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chirwa, E. W. (2007). Sources of technical efficiency among smallholder maize farmers in southern Malawi. Nairobi: The African Economic Research Consortium.Google Scholar
  11. Chirwa, E., & Dorward, A. (2013). Agricultural Input Subsidies. UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coelli, T., & Fleming, E. (2004). Diversification economies and specialisation efficiencies in a mixed food and coffee smallholder farming system in Papua New Guinea. Agricultural Economics, 31(2–3), 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conroy, A., Blackie, M., Whiteside, A., Malewezi, J., & Sachs, J. (2006). Poverty, AIDS and hunger: Breaking the poverty trap in Malawi. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2010). Agricultural growth and poverty reduction: Additional evidence. World Bank Research Observer, 25(1), 1–20 Retrieved from http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/1/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deininger, K., & Byerlee, D. (2012). The rise of large farms in land abundant countries: Do they have a future? World Development, 40(4), 701–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devereux, S. (2007). The impact of droughts and floods on food security and policy options to alleviate negative effects. Agricultural Economics, 37, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diao, X., Headey, D., & Johnson, M. (2008). Toward a green revolution in Africa: What would it achieve, and what would it require? Agricultural Economics, 39, 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dorward, A. (2006). Markets and pro-poor agricultural growth: Insights from livelihood and informal rural economy models in Malawi. Agricultural Economics, 35(2), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Filipski, M., & Taylor, J. E. (2012). A simulation impact evaluation of rural income transfers in Malawi and Ghana. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(1), 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaigne, C., Le Gallo, J., Larue, S., & Schmitt, B. (2012). Does regulation of manure land application work against agglomeration economies? Theory and evidence from the French hog sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(1), 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gould, W. (2016). Can you explain Chow tests? Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/statistics/chow-tests/.
  22. Government of Malawi (2011). Malawi agricultural sector wide approach. Lilongwe: Government of Malawi. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.fao.org/tc/tca/CAADPTT/CAADP-Implementation/CAADP-Post-Compact/Investment Plans/National-Agricultural-Investment-Plans/Malawi-Post-Compact-Investment-Plan.pdf
  23. Government of Malawi (2013). Malawi National Export Strategy (Vol. 1). Lilongwe. Retrieved from www.most.mw/files/download/218af383ae2ff3d.
  24. Harvey, C. A., Rakotobe, Z. L., Rao, N. S., Dave, R., Razafimahatratra, H., Rabarijohn, R. H., Rajaofara, H., & MacKinnon, J. L. (2014). Extreme vulnerability of smallholder farmers to agricultural risks and climate change in Madagascar. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1639), 20130089.Google Scholar
  25. Helmers, G., Shaik, S., & Atwood, J. (2003). Social and scale efficiency gains due to vertical integration in the US hog sector. In Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting. Alabama. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6530936.pdf.
  26. Hitayezu, P., Zegeye, E. W., & Ortmann, G. F. (2016). Farm level crop diversification in the midlands region of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa: Patterns, microeconomic drivers and policy implications. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 40(6), 553–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holden, S., & Lunduka, R. (2012). Do fertilizer subsidies crowd out organic manures? The case of Malawi. Agricultural Economics, 43(3), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ibrahim, H., Rahman, S. A., Envulus, E., & Oyewole, S. (2009). Income and crop diversification among farming households in a rural area of north central Nigeria. Agro-Science, 8(2), 84–89.Google Scholar
  29. Isaacs, K. B., Snapp, S. S., Chung, K., & Waldman, K. B. (2016). Assessing the value of diverse cropping systems under a new agricultural policy environment in Rwanda. Food Security, 8(3), 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Islam, N., & Rahman, M. (2012). An assessment of crop diversification in Bangladesh: A spatial analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 19(1), 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joshi, P. K., Gulati, A., Birthal, P. S., & Twari, A. (2003). Agricultural diversification in South Asia: Patterns, determinants, and policy implications. Discussion Paper No. 57. Markets and Structural Studies Division. Washington D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Kamanga, B. C. G., Kanyama-Phiri, G. Y., Waddington, S. R., Almekinders, C., & Giller, K. E. (2014). Evaluation and adoption of annual legumes by smallholder maize farmers for soil fertility maintenance and food diversity in central Malawi. Food Security, 6(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kasperski, S., & Holland, D. S. (2013). Income diversification and risk for fishermen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(6), 2076–2081.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Kassie, M. (2014). Low risk, high returns: how adoption of crop diversification and minimum tillage is a win-win for smallholder farmers in Malawi. Socioeconomics Program Policy Brief. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Retrieved from http://aciar.gov.au/aifsc/sites/default/files/images/policy-brief_5_0.pdf.
  35. Kent, R., & Poulton, C. (2008). Marginal farmers, a review of the literature. School of Oriental and African Studies and Concern Worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.concern.net/sites/default/files/resource/2009/04/3573-marginalfarmers_literature_review.pdf.
  36. Kishindo, P. (2004). Customary land tenure and the new land policy in Malawi. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 22(2), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lea, N., & Hanmer, L. (2009). Constraints to growth in Malawi. Southern Africa Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit. Washington, DC: Africa Region, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  38. Lin, B. B. (2011). Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: Adaptive management for environmental change. Bioscience, 61(3), 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lunduka, R., Ricker-Gilbert, J., Shively, G., & Jayne, T. (2014). Understanding and Improving FISP targeting by part 1: what we already know. IFPRI POLICY BRIEF III, 1–5. Retrieved from http://massp.ifpri.info/files/2014/07/Policy-Brief3_revised_circulated.pdf.
  40. Mapila, M., Kirsten, J. F., Meyer, F., & Kankwamba, H. (2013). A partial equilibrium model of the Malawi maize commodity market. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Marenya, P. P., & Barrett, C. B. (2009). Soil quality and fertilizer use rates among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 40(5), 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matsumoto, A., Merlone, U., & Szidarovszky, F. (2012). Some notes on applying the Herfindahl–Hirschman index. Applied Economics Letters, 19(2), 181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCord, P. F., Cox, M., Schmitt-Harsh, M., & Evans, T. (2015). Crop diversification as a smallholder livelihood strategy within semi-arid agricultural systems near Mount Kenya. Land Use Policy, 42, 738–750.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Messina, J., Peter, B. G., & Snapp, S. S. (2017). Re-evaluating the Malawi farm input subsidy Programme. Nature Plants, 3, 17013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mhango, W. G. (2011). Nitrogen budgets in legume based cropping systems in Northern Malawi. USA: PhD thesis, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  46. Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (MoAFS). (2012a). Guide to agricultural production and resource Management in Malawi. Lilongwe: Government of Malawi.Google Scholar
  47. Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (MoAFS). (2012b). Agricultural Statistical Bulletin. Lilongwe: Government of Malawi.Google Scholar
  48. Minot, N., Epprecht, M., Tran, T. T. A., & Le, Q. T. (2006). Income diversification and poverty in the northern uplands of Vietnam. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Mukherjee, S., & Benson, T. (2003). The determinants of poverty in Malawi, 1998. World Development, 31(2), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. National Statistics Office (2005). Malawi second integrated household survey (IHS-2). Zomba: Government of Malawi. Retrieved from http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/1110/Malawi-second-integrated-household-survey-2004-20051.pdf.
  51. National Statistics Office. (2012). Third integrated household survey report. Zomba: Government of Malawi Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLSMS/Resources/3358986-1233781970982/5800988-1271185595871/IHS3_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  52. Ndhlovu, D. E. (2010). Determinants of farm households’ cropland allocation and crop diversification decisions: the role of fertilizer subsidies in Malawi. Retrieved from http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=NO2010262513#.WGT-97lKIPs.mendeley.
  53. Njoloma, H. M., Kita, I., Kitamura, Y., & Aoyagi, S. (2011). Effect of climate change on Rainfed maize production: Assessment of maize production vs. a changing rainfall pattern in Malawi. Journal of Rainwater Catchment Systems, 16(2), 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pauw, K., & Thurlow, J. (2014). Malawi’s farm input subsidy program: where do we go from here? MaSSP Policy Note 18 (March 2014), Malawi Strategy Support Program, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).Google Scholar
  55. Pauw, K., Thurlow, J., Bachu, M., & van Seventer, D. E. (2011). The economic costs of extreme weather events: A hydrometeorological CGE analysis for Malawi. Environment and Development Economics, 16(2), 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pauw, K., Dorosh, P. A., & Mazunda, J. (2013). Exchange rate policy and devaluation in Malawi: IFPRI Discussion Papers, (March). Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/1253.html.
  57. Pellegrini, L., & Tasciotti, L. (2014). Crop diversification, dietary diversity and agricultural income: Empirical evidence from eight developing countries. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement, 5189, 1–17.Google Scholar
  58. Pingali, P. L. (2012). Green revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(31), 12302–12308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rahman, S. (2009). Whether crop diversification is a desired strategy for agricultural growth in Bangladesh? Food Policy, 34(4), 340–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roland-holst, D., & Park, C. (2015). Myanmar: Long term scenarios for sustained macroeconomic growth. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  61. Saint-Macary, C., Keil, A., Nielsen, T., Birkenberg, A., Van, L. T. A., Van, D. T. T., et al. (2014). Linkages between agriculture, poverty and natural resource use in mountainous regions of Southeast Asia. In H. L. Frohlich, P. Schreinemachers, K. Stahr, & G. Clemens (Eds.), Sustainable land use and rural development in Southeast Asia: Innovations and policies four mountainous areas (Vol. 34, pp. 76–77). London: SpringerLink.  https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.mm132.Google Scholar
  62. Save the Children (2008). The practitioners’ guide to the household economy approach. Regional Hunger and Vulnerability Programme. Save the Children. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/gnf3ek8.
  63. Shiferaw, B., Tesfaye, K., Kassie, M., Abate, T., Prasanna, B. M., & Menkir, A. (2014). Managing vulnerability to drought and enhancing livelihood resilience in sub-Saharan Africa: Technological, institutional and policy options. Weather and Climate Extremes, 3, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Simtowe, F., Zeller, M., & Diagne, A. (2009). The impact of credit constraints on the adoption of hybrid maize in Malawi. Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies, 90(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  66. Singh, N. P., Bantilan, C., & Byjesh, K. (2014). Vulnerability and policy relevance to drought in the semi-arid tropics of Asia – A retrospective analysis. Weather and Climate Extremes, 3, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Snapp, S. S., & Fisher, M. (2015). "filling the maize basket" supports crop diversity and quality of household diet in Malawi. Food Security, 7(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tankari, M. R. (2017). Cash crops reduce the welfare of farm households in Senegal. Food Security, 9(5), 1105–1115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0727-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 26(1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. US Department of Agriculture (2016). Malawi Food Economy Zones Malawi FEZ map explanations. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/rssiws/al/malawi_economy.pdf.
  71. Verduzco-Gallo, I., Ecker, O., & Pauw, K. (2014). Changes in food and nutrition security in Malawi: Analysis of recent survey evidence (Vol. 6). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  72. Waldman, K. B., Ortega, D. L., Richardson, R. B., Clay, D. C., & Snapp, S. (2016). Preferences for legume attributes in maize-legume cropping systems in Malawi. Food Security, 8(6), 1087–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA's statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Zeller, M., Diagne, A., & Mataya, C. (1998). Market access by smallholder farmers in Malawi: Implications for technology adoption, agricultural productivity and crop income. Agricultural Economics, 19(1), 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature and International Society for Plant Pathology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Development Research (ZEF)University of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesLilongweMalawi
  3. 3.Technical Center for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA)WageningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations