Skip to main content
Log in

An anatomical study of wormian bones from the eastern part of India: is genetic influence a primary determinant of their morphogenesis?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Anatomical Science International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the years a number of investigators have analysed the morphology of wormian bones in different population groups across the world. There have been significant variations between findings reported in these studies, and this has prompted researchers to focus on the influence of genetic factors on the morphology of these bones. In the light of the above observation, we considered it justified to conduct anatomical studies on wormian bones in different population groups; hence, we undertook the present study to look into the morphological details of these bones among a population in the eastern part of India. We observed a total of 120 adult dry human skulls of unknown age and sex, and noted the anatomical details of wormian bones when present. It was observed that wormian bones were present in 45 % of skulls, and that 30 % of skulls had more than one wormian bone. We also found that 2.5 % of the skulls had ten or more wormian bones, which is considered as pathognomonic. Maximum incidence (53.33 %) was observed at the lambdoid suture and minimum incidence at the bregma and metopic suture (0.61 % in each case). We noted a high incidence (21.21 %) of Inca bone/lambdoid ossicle, and bilaterally symmetrical wormian bones were present in 12.5 % study skulls. There were statistically significant (P < 0.05) variations between the findings of the present study and values reported in previous studies conducted in other regions of India and different parts of the world. Our observations favour the view that genetic influence primarily determines the morphology of wormian bones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balgir RS (1992) Regional and genetic variations among the Hindu Gujjars of Northwestern India. Int J Anthropol 7:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberini F, Bruner E, Cartolari R, Franchitto G, Heyn R, Ricci F, Manzi G (2008) An unusually wide human bregmatic wormian bone: anatomy, tomographic description, and possible significance. Surg Radiol Anat 30:683–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellary SS, Steinberg A, Mirzayan N et al (2013) Wormian bones: a review. Clin Anat 26:922–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett KA (1965) The etiology and genetics of wormian bones. Am J Phys Anthropol 23:255–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman RA, Afifi AK, Miyauchi R (1988) Skeletal systems: cranium. In: Compendium of human anatomical variations. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, pp 197–205

  • Berry AC, Berry RJ (1967) Epigenetic variation in the human cranium. J Anat 101:361–379

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brasili P, Zaccagni L, Gualdi-Russo E (1999) Scoring of nonmetric cranial traits: a population study. J Anat 195:551–562

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brothwell DR (1959) The use of non-metrical characters of the skull in differentiating populations. Dtsch Ges Anthropol 6:103–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambellan V (1883) Étude anatomique et anthropologique sur les os Wormiens. thèse de médecine, Paris, p 66

  • Cirpan S, Aksu F, Mas N (2015) The incidence and topographic distribution of sutures including wormian bones in human skulls. J Craniofac Surg 26:1687–1690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cremin B, Goodman H, Spranger J, Beighton P (1982) Wormian bones in osteogenesis imperfect and other disorders. Skelet Radiol 8:35–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey GA (1897) Wormian bones in artificially deformed Kwakiuti crania. Am Anthropol 10:169–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Najjar MY, Dawson GL (1977) The effect of cranial deformations on the incidence of wormian bones in the lambdoid suture. Am J Phys Anthropol 46:155–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Najjar MY, Aufderheide AC, Ortner DJ (1985) Preserved human remains from the southern region of the North American continent: report of autopsy findings. Hum Pathol 16:273–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gazi NN, Tamang R, Singh VK et al (2013) Genetic structure of Tibeto-Burman populations of Bangladesh: evaluating the gene flow along the sides of Bay-of-Bengal. PLoS One 8:e75064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Govsa F, Ozer MA, Bayraktaroglu S, Aktas EO (2014) Anatomoradiological identification of intrasutural bones for importance of cranial fracture. Turk Neurosurg 24:357–362

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham JM Jr, Kreutzman J, Earl D, Halberg A, Samoya C, Guo X (2005) Deformational brachycephaly in supine-sleeping infants. J Pediatr 146:253–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanihara T, Ishida H (2001) Os incae: variation in frequency in major human population groups. J Anat 198:137–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanty P, Silva SR, Turner C (2000) Prenatal diagnosis of wormian bones. J Ultrasound Med 19:863–869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan SB, Kemp SS, Oh KS (1991) Radiographic manifestations of congenital anomalies of the skull. Radiol Clin N Am 29:195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan AA, Asari MA, Harran A (2011) Unusual presence of wormian (sutural) bones in human skulls. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 70:291–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra VK, Agrawal SK, Tiwari SP (1980) Os orbitale. Acta Anat 106:290–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manjunath KY (2013) Supernumerary bones in the walls of the bony orbit. People’s J Sci Res 6:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Marathe R, Yogesh A, Pandit S, Joshi M, Trivedi G (2010) Inca-interparietal bones in neurocranium of human skulls in Central India. J Neurosci Rural Pract 1:14–16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marti B, Sirinelli D, Maurin L, Carpentier E (2013) Wormian bones in a general paediatric population. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:428–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murlimanju BV, Prabhu LV, Ashraf CM, Kumar CG, Rai R, Maheshwari C (2011) Morphological and topographical study of wormian bones in cadaver dry skulls. J Morphol Sci 28:176–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Olry R (1994) Os dans Incas, os épactal, os wormien: histoire d’une trilogie mal comprise. Acta Belgica Historia Medicinae 7:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Opperman LA (2000) Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites. Dev Dyn 219:472–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker CA (2009) Wormian bones. BiblioLife, Charleston, pp 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil M, Sheelavant S (2012) Sexual dimorphism among the wormian bones in adult human skulls. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 34:124–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryles CV, Khan AJ (1979) Wormian bones: a marker of CNS abnormality? Am J Dis Child 133:380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riveiro ME, Von Tschudi JJ (1853) Peruvian antiquities. Putnam, New York, pp 38–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Reverón R, Arráez-Aybar LA (2015) Ole Worm (1588–1654)—anatomist and antiquarian. Eur J Anat 19:299–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Lara PA, Graham JM Jr, Hing AV, Lee J, Cunningham M (2007) The morphogenesis of wormian bones: a study of craniosynostosis and purposeful cranial deformation. Am J Med Genet A 143:3243–3251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena SK, Chowdhary DS, Jain SP (1986) Interparietal bones in Nigerian skulls. J Anat 144:235–237

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenwolf GL, Bleyl SB, Brauer PR, Francist-West PH (2009) Development of the pharyngeal apparatus and face. Larsen’s human embryology. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 545–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Semler O, Cheung MS, Glorieux FH, Rauch F (2010) Wormian bones in osteogenesis imperfect: correlation to clinical findings and genotype. Am J Med Genet 152A:1681–1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh PJ, Gupta CD, Arora AK (1979) Incidence of interparietal bones in adult skulls of Agra Region. Anat Anz 145:528–531

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soames RW (1995) Skeletal system. In: Williams PL (ed) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 606–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Udupi S, Srinivasan JK (2011) Interparietal (Inca) bone: a case report. Int J Anat Var 4:90–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedula D, Rani R, Vijayalakshmi K, Thu KM, Rao VB, Viswakanth B (2015) Incidence of wormian bones in the North Coastal Andhra Pradesh. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 14:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishali N, Ebenraj TJ, Rojomon TC (2014) A rare existence of significant number of wormian bones in the lambdoid suture. Int J Sci Res 3:671–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Walulkar S, Ksheersagar D, Walulkar M (2012) The study of wormian bones in human skulls in Vidarbha region. PJMS 2:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Yucel F, Egilmez H, Akgun Z (1998) A study of interparietal bone in man. Turk J Med Sci 28:505–509

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express heartfelt gratitude to all the clinical tutors and technicians of the Department of Anatomy, ESI-PGIMSR and ESIC Medical College, Joka, Kolkata, India for their unconditional support throughout the study. We are grateful to the authorities of ESI-PGIMSR and ESIC Medical College, Joka for their kind cooperation during the course of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjib Kumar Ghosh.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standard

The authors hereby declare that the study was conducted only after approval had been obtained from the Ethical Committee of ESI-PGIMSR & ESIC Medical college, Joka, Kolkata, India, whose guidelines are in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and all subsequent revisions.

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, S.K., Biswas, S., Sharma, S. et al. An anatomical study of wormian bones from the eastern part of India: is genetic influence a primary determinant of their morphogenesis?. Anat Sci Int 92, 373–382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-016-0342-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-016-0342-1

Keywords

Navigation