Correction to: Fisheries Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-019-01320-4

In the original publication the third well of the sequence in figure 3 is incorrectly presented as “chgH-LUC-EGFP”. The correct version should be read “chgH-vtg signal-EGFP”.

Fig. 3 Expression analysis of EGFP in the ovary using RT-PCR. a Electrophoresis image of the PCR amplicons of ef- gene. In all samples, the smaller size of PCR products (374 bp) derived from the exon sequence were observed, whereas the longer size of PCR products (519 bp) derived from the exon and intron sequence were not detected. b Electrophoresis image of the PCR amplicons of EGFP gene. The PCR amplicons (298 bp) containing the EGFP gene were detected only from the ovary of a transgenic female which expresses EGFP in the oocytes and was used as a positive control (PC), but not from that of WT (Cab), Tg (chgH-vtg signal-EGFP) and Tg (chgH-vtg signal-LUC-EGFP)

figure a