Skip to main content
Log in

Travel Time Functions Prediction for Time-Dependent Networks

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The studies on the TDN (time-dependent network), in which the travel time of the same road segment varies depending on the time of the day, have attracted much attention of researchers, but there is little work focusing on the travel time functions prediction problem. Though traditional methods for travel time or travel speed prediction problem can be used to generate the travel time functions, they have some limitations due to the need of less breakpoints, fine granularity, and long-term prediction. In this paper, we study the travel time functions prediction problem for TDN based on taxi trajectory data. In order to maintain a high degree of accuracy in fine-grained and long-predicted situations, we take into account not only the traffic incidents but also the data sparsity. Specifically, a traffic incident detection method is proposed based on k-means algorithm and a downstream-based strategy is proposed to estimate the speeds of segments considering the data sparsity. To make the breakpoints of function not so much, a prediction algorithm based on classification using ELM (extreme learning machine) is proposed, which predicts the speed classes taking both the weather and the adjacent segment conditions into account. In addition, a transformation method is presented to convert the discrete travel speeds into piecewise linear functions satisfying FIFO (First-In-First-Out) property. The experimental results show that ELM outperforms SVM (support vector machine) with regard to both the training time and prediction accuracy. Moreover, it also can be seen that both the weather conditions and the adjacent segment conditions have impact on the prediction accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.datatang.com/data/44502

  2. http://lishi.tianqi.com/beijing/201211.html

References

  1. Orda A, Rom R. Shortest-path and minimum-delay algorithms in networks with time-dependent edge-length. J ACM (JACM) 1990;37(3):607–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Delling D. 2008. Time-dependent sharc-routing. In: European symposium on algorithms, pp 332–343. Springer.

  3. Demiryurek U, Banaei-Kashani F, Shahabi C. 2010. Towards k-nearest neighbor search in time-dependent spatial network databases. In: International workshop on databases in networked information systems, pp. 296–310. Springer.

  4. Komai Y, Nguyen D H, Hara T, Nishio S. 2014. knn search utilizing index of the minimum road travel time in time-dependent road networks. In: IEEE 33rd international symposium on reliable distributed systems workshops (SRDSW), pp 131–137. IEEE.

  5. Li J, Liu X, Liu X, Xia X, Zhu R. Improved td-ftt algorithm based on dynamically selecting heuristic values. J Comput Appl 2018;38(1):120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Costa CF, Machado J, Nascimento M A, Macêdo JA. 2015. Aggregate k-nearest neighbors queries in time-dependent road networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on mobile geographic information systems, pp 3–12 ACM.

  7. Borutta F, Nascimento MA, Niedermayer J, Kröger P. 2015. Reverse k-nearest neighbour schedules in time-dependent road networks. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, p 27. ACM.

  8. Li L, Hua W, Du X, Zhou X. Minimal on-road time route scheduling on time-dependent graphs. Proc VLDB Endowment 2017;10(11):1274–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li L, Zheng K, Wang S, Hua W, Zhou X. Go slow to go fast: minimal on-road time route scheduling with parking facilities using historical trajectory. The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases 2018;27(3):321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Y, Gao H, Yu J X, Li J. Finding the cost-optimal path with time constraint over time-dependent graphs. Proc VLDB Endowment 2014;7(9):673–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Foschini L, Hershberger J, Suri S. 2011. On the complexity of time-dependent shortest paths. In: Proceedings of the twenty-second annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms pp. 327–341 SIAM.

  12. Ding Y, Li Y, Deng K, Tan H, Yuan M, Ni L M. Detecting and analyzing urban regions with high impact of weather change on transport. IEEE Transactions on Big Data 2017;3(2):126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao L, Ahmed A, Tang X, Lin N, Cuiwei L, Jiajia L. 2018. A weather-assisted driver experiences based path selection method. In: 2018 IEEE 20th international conference on high performance computing and communications (HPCC). IEEE.

  14. Cintia P, Trasarti R, De Macedo JA, Almada L, Fereira C. 2013. A gravity model for speed estimation over road network. In: IEEE 14th international conference on mobile data management (MDM), vol 2, pp 136–141. IEEE.

  15. Nascimento SM, Chucre MR, de Macedo JAF, Monteiro J, Casanova MA. 2016. On computing temporal functions for a time-dependent networks using trajectory data. In: Proceedings of the 20th international database engineering & applications symposium, pp 236–241. ACM.

  16. Vlahogianni EI, Golias JC, Karlaftis MG. Short-term traffic forecasting: Overview of objectives and methods. Transp Rev 2004;24(5):533–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vlahogianni EI, Karlaftis MG, Golias JC. Short-term traffic forecasting: Where we are and where we are going. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2014;43:3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chandra S, Al-Deek H. Cross-correlation analysis and multivariate prediction of spatial time series of freeway traffic speeds. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2008;2061:64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Y, Haghani A, Zeng X. Component garch models to account for seasonal patterns and uncertainties in travel-time prediction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2015;16(2):719–729.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shang P, Li X, Kamae S. Chaotic analysis of traffic time series. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2005;25(1):121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Okutani I, Stephanedes YJ. Dynamic prediction of traffic volume through kalman filtering theory. Transp Res B Methodol 1984;18(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Papageorgiou M, Messmer A. Renaissance–a unified macroscopic model-based approach to real-time freeway network traffic surveillance. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2006;14(3):190–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chien SI-J, Kuchipudi CM. Dynamic travel time prediction with real-time and historic data. J Transp Eng 2003;129(6):608–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang F, Yin Z, Liu H, Ran B. Online recursive algorithm for short-term traffic prediction. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2004;1879:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma X, Yu H, Wang Y, Wang Y. Large-scale transportation network congestion evolution prediction using deep learning theory. PloS One 2015;10(3):e0119044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang J, Liu F, Zou Y, Zhang W, Wang Y. 2017. An improved fuzzy neural network for traffic speed prediction considering periodic characteristic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

  27. Wu C-H, Ho J-M, Lee D-T. Travel-time prediction with support vector regression. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2004;5(4):276–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Asif MT, Dauwels J, Goh CY, Oran A, Fathi E, Xu M, Dhanya MM, Mitrovic N, Jaillet P. Spatiotemporal patterns in large-scale traffic speed prediction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2014;15(2):794–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y, Liu Y. Traffic forecasting using least squares support vector machines. Transportmetrica 2009;5(3):193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dimitriou L, Tsekeris T, Stathopoulos A. Adaptive hybrid fuzzy rule-based system approach for modeling and predicting urban traffic flow. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2008;16(5):554–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zheng W, Lee D.-H., Shi Q. Short-term freeway traffic flow prediction: Bayesian combined neural network approach. J Transp Eng 2006;132(2):114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong C, Richards SH, Yang Q, Shao C. Combining the statistical model and heuristic model to predict flow rate. J Transp Eng 2014;140(7):04014023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sigakova K, Mbiydzenyuy G, Holmgren J. 2015. Impacts of traffic conditions on the performance of road freight transport. In: IEEE 18th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), pp 2947–2952. IEEE.

  34. Abdel-Aty MA, Pemmanaboina R. Calibrating a real-time traffic crash-prediction model using archived weather and its traffic data. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2006;7(2):167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Qiao W, Haghani A, Hamedi M. Short-term travel time prediction considering the effects of weather. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2012;2308:61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K. 2004. Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks. In: 2004 IEEE international joint conference on neural networks, 2004. Proceedings. vol 2, pp 985–990 IEEE.

  37. Huang G-B, Zhu Q-Y, Siew C-K. Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 2006;70(1):489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Qu B.-Y., Lang B, Liang JJ, Qin AK, Crisalle OD. Two-hidden-layer extreme learning machine for regression and classification. Neurocomputing 2016;175:826–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Huang G-B, Chen L. Letters: Convex incremental extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 2007;70(16-18):3056–3062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huang G.-B., Chen L. Enhanced random search based incremental extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 2008;71(16-18):3460–3468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu N, Sakamoto JT, Cao J, Koh ZX, Ho AFW, Lin Z, Ong MEH. Ensemble-based risk scoring with extreme learning machine for prediction of adverse cardiac events. Cogn Comput 2017;9(4):545–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu H, Fang J, Xu X, Sun F. 2018. Surface material recognition using active multi-modal extreme learning machine. Cognitive Computation, pp 1–14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12559-018-9571-z.

  43. Atli BG, Miche Y, Kalliola A, Oliver I, Holtmanns S, Lendasse A. Anomaly-based intrusion detection using extreme learning machine and aggregation of network traffic statistics in probability space. Cognitive Computation 2018;10(5):848–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu Y, Vong CM, Wong PK. Extreme learning machine for huge hypotheses re-ranking in statistical machine translation. Cogn Comput 2017;9(2):285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Guo T, Zhang L, Tan X. Neuron pruning-based discriminative extreme learning machine for pattern classification. Cogn Comput 2017;9(4):581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li J, Wang B, Wang G, Zhang Y. Probabilistic threshold query optimization based on threshold classification using elm for uncertain data. Neurocomputing 2016;174:211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li J, Xia X, Liu X, Wang B, Zhou D, An Y. Probabilistic group nearest neighbor query optimization based on classification using elm. Neurocomputing 2018;277:21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ban X, Guo C, Li G. 2016. Application of extreme learning machine on large scale traffic congestion prediction. In: Proceedings of ELM-2015 vol 1 pp 293–305. Springer.

  49. Yuan J, Zheng Y, Zhang C, Xie X, Sun G-Z. 2010. An interactive-voting based map matching algorithm. In: 11th international conference on mobile data management (MDM), pp 43–52. IEEE.

Download references

Funding

This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61502317; and the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province under Grant No.201602559; and the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province under Grant 201602568; and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61701322, 61502316.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiajia Li or Xiufeng Xia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies involving human participants and/or animals by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Xia, X., Liu, X. et al. Travel Time Functions Prediction for Time-Dependent Networks. Cogn Comput 11, 145–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9603-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9603-8

Keywords

Navigation