Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Remarks on Discrete-time Multi-output Nonlinear Observer Canonical Form

  • Technical Notes and Correspondence
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

State equivalence to a discrete-time multi-output dual Brunovsky nonlinear observer canonical form (NOCF) has been extensively studied in the literature. In this paper, we find the necessary and sufficient conditions for state equivalence to a discrete-time multi-output NOCF which is more general than a dual Brunovsky NOCF. Our conditions show clearly the difference between a NOCF problem and a dual Brunovsky NOCF problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. J. Krener and A. Isidori, “Linearization by output injection and nonlinear observers,” Systems Control Lett., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Bestle and M. Zeitz, “Canonical form observer design for non-linear time-variable systems,” International Journal of Control, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 419–431, 1983.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Califano, S. Monaco, and D. Normand-Cyrot, “On the observer design in discrete-time,” Systems Control Lett., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 255–265, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. S.-T. Chung and J. W. Grizzle, “Sampled-data observer error linearization,” Automatica, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 997–1007, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Hou and A. C. Pugh, “Observer with linear error dynamics for nonlinear multi-output systems,” Systems Control Lett., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 291–300, 1999.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Jouan, “Immersion of nonlinear systems into linear systems modulo output injection,” SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1756–1778, 2003.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. Krener and W. Respondek, “Nonlinear observers with linearizable error dynamics,” SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 197–216, 1985.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. H.-G. Lee, A. Arapostathis, and S. I. Marcus, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for state equivalence to a nonlinear discrete-time observer canonical form,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2701–2707, 2008.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. H.-G. Lee, “Verifiable conditions for multi-output observer error linearizability,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 4876–4883, 2017.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. H.-G. Lee, “Verifiable conditions for discrete-time multi output observer error linearizability,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, to appear (Mar. 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Lee and K. Nam, “Observer design for autonomous discrete-time nonlinear systems,” Systems Control Lett., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Levine and R. Marino, “Nonlinear system immersion, observers, and finite-dimensional filters,” Systems Control Lett., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Lin and C. I. Byrnes, “Remarks on linearization of discrete-time autonomous systems and nonlinear observer design,” Systems Control Lett., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 1995.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. X. H. Xia and W.-B. Gao, “Nonlinear observer design by observer error linearization,” SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 199–216, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Besancon, “On output transformations for state linearization up to output injection,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1975–1981, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Califano, S. Monaco, and D. Normand-Cyrot, “On the observer design of multi output systems in discrete-time,” Proc. of IFAC, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 7–12, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Califano, S. Monaco, and D. Normand-Cyrot, “Canonical observer forms for multi-output systems up to coordinate and output transformations in discrete-time,” Automatica, vol. 45, pp. 2483–2490, 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. H.-G. Lee and J.-M. Hong, “Algebraic conditions for state equivalence to a discrete-time nonlinear observer form,” Systems Control Lett., vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 756–762, 2011.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Back, K. T. Yu, and J. H. Seo, “Dynamic observer error linearization,” Automatica, vol. 42, pp. 2195–2200, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Boutat and K. Busawon, “On the transformation of nonlinear dynamical systems into the extended nonlinear observable canonical form,” International Journal of Control, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 94–106, 2011.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Califano and C. H. Moog, “The observer error linearization problem via dynamic compensation,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 59, pp. 2502–2508, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. H. J. C. Huijberts, “On existence of extended observers for nonlinear discrete-time systems,” Lecture Notes in Control Information Science, Springer-Verlag, vol. 244, pp. 73–92, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. H.-G. Lee, K.-D. Kim, and H.-T. Jeon, “Restricted dynamic observer error linearizability,” Automatica, vol. 53, pp. 171–178, 2015.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Noh, N. H. Jo, and J. H. Seo, “Nonlinear observer design by dynamic observer error linearization,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1746–1750, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems, 3rd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. H. Nijmeijer and A. J. van der Schaft, Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Marino and P. Tomei, Nonlinear Control Design, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. D. G. Luenberger, “Canonical forms for linear multivariable systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 290–293, 1967.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Chung-Ang University, 221 Heuksuk-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 156-756, Korea

    Hong-Gi Lee & Hyeran Hong

Authors
  1. Hong-Gi Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyeran Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-Gi Lee.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Shihua Li under the direction of Editor Jessie (Ju H.) Park. This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning(NRF-2015R1D1A1A01058839). This research was also supported by the Chung-Ang University Research Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, HG., Hong, H. Remarks on Discrete-time Multi-output Nonlinear Observer Canonical Form. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 16, 2569–2574 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-017-0800-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-017-0800-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation