An Observer Based Sampled-data Control for Class of Scalar Nonlinear Systems Using Continualized Discretization Method

Regular Paper Control Theory and Applications
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

A new observer based sampled-data feedback control is proposed for a class of scalar nonlinear affine systems, where the control distribution is constant, in the presence of noise. The discrete-time states are estimated by a nonlinear state observer, and used for designing the sampled-data control. The discrete-time model used for controller and state observer design is derived using continualizated discretization method. This discretization method is based on the new concept of continualization of discrete-time models, and is applicable to any system whose Jacobian matrix is defined. In this work, it is shown that for the system without the presence of noise, the proposed sampled-data control preserves the equilibria and dynamics of the desired system, while the conventional control, which is based on forward difference method, does not. Simulations are carried out for the scalar Riccati system with the presence of noise to demonstrate the better performances of the proposed method not only in sampled-data control design, but also in system states estimation than the conventional method for both high and low sampling frequencies.

Keywords

Continualized discretization discrete-time model noise nonlinear sampled-data control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    D. Nesic and A. R. Teel, “Sampled-data control of nonlinear systems: an overview of recent results,” Perspectives in Robust Control, vol. 268, pp. 221–239, 2001. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Nesic and A. R. Teel, “A framework for stabilization of nonlinear sampled-data systems based on their approximate discrete-time models,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1103–1122, Jul 2004. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. H. Ahrens, X. Tan, and H. K. Khalil, “Multirate sampleddata output feedback control with application to smart material actuated systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2518–2529, 2009. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. K. Khalil, “Output feedback sampled-data stabilization of nonlinear systems,” Proc. of American Control Conference, pp. 2397–2402, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. H. Middleton and G. C. Goodwin, Digital Control and Estimation: A Unified Approach, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Monaco and D. Normand-Cyrot, “On the sampling of a linear analytic control system,” Proc. of 24th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1457–1462, 1985. [click]Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    D. Nesic and A. R. Teel, “Set stabilization of sampleddata nonlinear differential inclusions via their approximate discrete-time models,” Proc. of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2112–2117, 2000. [click]Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Cai, Z. Xiang, and J. Guo, “Adaptive finite-time faulttolerant consensus protocols for multiple mechanical systems,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 353, no. 6, pp. 1386–1408, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. Nesic and D. S. Laila, “A note on input-to-state stabilization for nonlinear sampled-data systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1153–1158, 2002. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    I. Karafyllis and C. Kravaris, “On the observer problem for discrete-time control systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 12–25, 2007.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. L. Ahmed, A. Nicolas, and G. Mohamed, “Sampleddata disturbance observer for a class of nonlinear systems,” Proc. of the 19th IFAC World Congress, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 3346–3351, 2014.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Beikzadeh and H. J. Marquez, “Multirate observers for nonlinear sampled-data systems using input-to-state stability and discrete-time approximation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 2469–2474, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. Nguyen-Van and N. Hori, “Discretization of nonautonomous nonlinear systems based on continualization of an exact discrete-time model,” Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control-Transactions of the ASME, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 021004, 9 pages, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    T. Nguyen-Van and N. Hori, “New class of discrete-time models for non-linear systems through discretisation of integration gains,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 80–89, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Nguyen-Van and N. Hori, “A new discrete-time linearization feedback law for scalar Riccati systems,” Proc. of 2013 SICE Annual Conference (SICE), pp. 2560–2565, 2013.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. E. Mickens, Nonstandard Finite Difference Models of Differential Equations, World Scientific, Singapore, River Edge, N.J., 1994.MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    C. Belta and L. C. G. J. M. Habets, “Controlling a class of nonlinear systems on rectangles,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1749–1759, 2006. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems, 3rd ed., Communications and Control Engineering Series, Springer, Berlin, New York, 1995.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S. Huang and Z. Xiang, “Finite-time stabilization of switched stochastic nonlinear systems with mixed odd and even powers,” Automatica, vol. 73, pp. 130–137, 2016. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. P. A. Mohinder and S. Grewal, Kalman Filtering: Theory and Practice with MATLAB Third Edison, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2008.MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    K. Reif, S. Gunther, E. Yaz, and R. Unbehauen, “Stochastic stability of the discrete-time extended Kalman filter,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 714–728, 1999. [click]MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. I. Zelikin, Control Theory and Optimization Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 86, Springer, Berlin, 2000.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    M. Nowakowski and H. C. Rosu, “Newton’s laws of motion in the form of a Riccati equation,” Physical Review E, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 047602, 2002.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    R. W. T., Riccati Differential Equations, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 86, Academic Press, New York, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Technology Management for InnovationThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations