Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Number of Control Points for Fitting B-Splines in Wind Turbine Blade Measurement

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The manufacture of large-scale products such as aircraft and wind turbines needs detailed inspection to ensure the required dimensional tolerances are met. A coherent laser radar with an assisting mirror was used in this research to inspect a half-size wind turbine blade. This paper investigates the optimal distribution of inspection points that would produce the most accurate B-Spline fitting to the CAD model surfaces and so shorten the inspection and analysis process without compromising on accuracy. Even though the optimal solution was found to be points with 100 mm spacing on a moderate surface gradient and with 20–25 mm spacing on a more severe surface gradient, the findings suggest the employment of a non-uniform distribution would produce a more accurate fitting. This paper also explores data alignment by Degree of Freedom constraints with a triple B-Spline and investigates whether denser data points would improve the transformation. The optimal solution was found to be constraining movement in Z, Rx and Ry. Therefore, to achieve better transformation, surfaces were treated based on their gradient. This resulted in a constraint in X, Y and Z, and Ry for a moderate gradient and Y, Z and Rz for a more severe gradient. The optimal number of inspection points for fitting a B-Spline on a half-size blade was found to be 18 points for the front section with 100 mm spacing, 15 points for the back section with 100 mm spacing, and between 14 and 18 points with 20–25 mm spacing on the base section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puttock, M. (1978). Large-scale metrology. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 21(3), 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Estler, W., Edmundon, K., Peggs, G., & Parker, D. H. (2002). Large-scale metrology—An update. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 51(2), 587–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peggs, G., Maropoulos, P., Hughes, E., Forbes, A., Robson, S., Ziebart, M., et al. (2009). Recent developments in large-scale dimensional metrology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223(6), 571–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2014). Large-scale dimensional metrology (LSDM): From tapes and theodolites to multi-sensor systems. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15(8), 1739–1758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmitt, R. H., Peterek, M., Morse, E., Knapp, W., Galetto, M., Härtig, F., et al. (2016). Advances in large-scale metrology—Review and future trends. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 65, 643–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Q., Zissler, N., & Holden, R. (2013). Evaluate error sources and uncertainty in large scale measurement systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 29, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weckenmann, A., Jiang, X., Sommer, K.-D., Neuschaefer-Rube, U., Seewig, J., Shaw, L., et al. (2009). Multisensor data fusion in dimensional metrology. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 58, 701–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Galetto, M., & Pralio, B. (2010). Optimal sensor positioning for large scale metrology applications. Precision Engineering, 34, 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramasamy, S. K., & Raja, J. (2013). Performance evaluation of multi-scale data fusion methods for surface metrology domain. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32, 514–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Galetto, M., Mastrogiacomo, L., Maisano, D., & Franceschini, F. (2015). Cooperative fusion of distributed multi-sensor LVM (large volume metrology) systems. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 64, 483–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016). A new methodology to design multi-sensor networks for distributed large-volume metrology systems based on triangulation. Precision Engineering, 43, 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016). Combing multiple large volume metrology systems: Competitive versus cooperative data fusion. Precision Engineering, 43, 514–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galetto, M., Mastrogiacomo, L., Maisano, D., & Fraanceschini, F. (2016). Uncertainty evaluation of distributed large-scale-metrology systems by a Monte Carlo approach. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 65, 491–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jang, Y.-S., & Kim, S.-W. (2017). Compensation of the refractive index of air in laser interferometer for distance measurement: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 18(12), 1881–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, J., Pagani, L., Leach, R. K., Zeng, W. H., Colosimo, B. M., & Zhou, P. L. (2017). Study of weighted fusion methods for the measurement of surface geometry. Precision Engineering, 47, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ren, M. J., Sun, L. J., Liu, M. Y., Cheung, C. F., Yin, Y. H., & Cao, Y. L. (2017). A weighted least square based data fusion method for precision measurement of freeform surfaces. Precision Engineering, 48, 144–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwenke, H., Neuschaefer-Rube, U., Pfeifer, T., & Kunzmann, H. (2002). Optical methods for dimensional metrology in production engineering. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 51(2), 685–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Savio, E., De Chiffre, L., & Schmitt, R. (2007). Metrology of freeform shaped parts. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 56(2), 810–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Talbot, J., Wang, Q., Brady, N., & Holden, R. (2016). Offshore wind turbine blades measurement using coherent laser radar. Measurement, 79, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Summers, A., Wang, Q., Brady, N., & Holden, R. (2016). Investigating the measurement of offshore wind turbine blades using coherent laser radar. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 41, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Auger, D., Wang, Q., Trevelyan, J., Huang, S. L., & Zhao, W. (2018). Investigating the quality inspection process of offshore wind turbine blades using B-spline surfaces. Measurement, 115, 162–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slotwinski, A. R., Goodwin, F. E., & Simonson, D. L. (1989). Utilizing GaalAs laser diodes as a source for frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) coherent laser radar. In Proc. SPIE, laser diode technology and applications (Vol. 1043, pp. 245–251).

  23. Nikon Metrology. (2014). Laser radar MV330/350—For automated, non-contact large scale metrology. Nikon Metrology, 2014. http://www.nikonmetrology.com/en_EU/Products/Large-Volume-Applications/Laser-Radar/MV330-MV350-Laser-Radar. Accessed July 2018.

  24. New River Kinematics. (2014). Spatial analyzer. New River Kinematics, 2014. http://www.kinematics.com/spatialanalyzer/. Accessed July 2018.

  25. de Boor, C. (1972). On calculating with B-splines. Journal of Approximation Theory, 6(1), 50–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Tai, C., Hu, S., & Huang, Q. (2003). Approximate merging of B-spline curves via knot adjustment and constrained optimization. Computer-Aided Design, 35, 893–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, X., Ma, W., Xu, G., & Paul, J.-C. (2010). Computing the Hausdorff distance between two B-spline curves. Computer-Aided Design, 42(12), 1197–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang, Y., Cao, S., Yong, J., Zhang, H., Paul, J.-C. J., Sun, J., et al. (2008). Approximate computation of curves on B-spline surfaces. Computer-Aided Design, 20(2), 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, H., Wang, W., & Sun, J. (2004). Control point adjustment for B-spline curve approximation. Computer-Aided Design, 36, 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li, H., & Kong, X. (2013). A novel modeling approach in blade shape design. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 8(8), 1013–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from Royal Academy of Engineering Newton Research Collaboration Programme (NRCP/1415/91) and Royal Society—China Natural Science Foundation International Exchange Award (IE150600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, C.H.L., Wang, Q., Holden, R. et al. Optimal Number of Control Points for Fitting B-Splines in Wind Turbine Blade Measurement. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 20, 1507–1517 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00173-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00173-2

Keywords

Navigation