Advertisement

The Development of Gelatin-Based Bio-Ink for Use in 3D Hybrid Bioprinting

  • Jung Hwal Shin
  • Hyun-Wook Kang
Regular Paper
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

Numerous researchers have studied 3D hybrid bioprinting technology, as it appears to be a viable option for producing cellular constructs with clinical relevance. This technology uses a co-printing process with high strength bio-plastics and cell-laden bio-inks. The bio-inks used in this technology should be easily printable and provide good biological environment for artificial tissue regeneration. In this research, we present a gelatin-based bio-ink for 3D hybrid bioprinting. We prepared a variety of gelatin mixtures and evaluated them in terms of their printability. We also investigated the effects of using hyaluronan and glycerol as additives. The results showed that hyaluronan and glycerol enhanced the spatial resolution and uniformity of the printed patterns. We determined the optimal composition for the bio-ink and then conducted 2D and 3D cell patterning tests. The results showed that our bio-ink can produce a line width of approximately 200μm, and multiple types of cells can be positioned precisely in 3D structures. We also conducted a cytocompatibility test with NIH3T3 fibroblast. This test showed the processability of our bio-ink with living cells. Finally, we printed an actual-size, human ear-shaped construct. These experiments suggest that the proposed gelatin-based bio-ink is well suited for applications to 3D hybrid bioprinting technology.

Keywords

3D hybrid bioprinting Bio-ink Gelatin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Murphy, S. V. and Atala, A., “3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 773–785, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mironov, V., Reis, N., and Derby, B., “Bioprinting: A Beginning,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 631–634, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dababneh, A. and Ozbolat, I. T., “Bioprinting Technology: A Current State-of-the-Art Review,” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 6, Paper No. 061016, 2014.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shin, H.-R. and Kim, J. Y., “A Study on Fabrication of 3D Porous Scaffold Combined with Polymer Deposition System and a Salt Leaching Method,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1229–1235, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee, J.-S., Seol, Y.-J., Sung, M., Moon, W., Kim, S. W., et al., “Development and Analysis of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printed Biomimetic Ceramic,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1711–1719, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, J., Kim, K. E., Bang, S., Noh, I., and Lee, C., “A Desktop Multi-Material 3D Bio-Printing System with Open-Source Hardware and Software,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 605–612, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang, H.-W., Lee, S. J., Ko, I. K., Kengla, C., Yoo, J. J., and Atala, A., “A 3D Bioprinting System to Produce Human-Scale Tissue Constructs with Structural Integrity,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 312–319, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pati, F., Jang, J., Ha, D.-H., Kim, S. W., Rhie, J.-W., et al., “Printing Three-Dimensional Tissue Analogues with Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink,” Nature Communications, Vol. 5, No. Article No. 3935, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schuurman, W., Khristov, V., Pot, M. W., van Weeren, P. R., Dhert, W. J., and Malda, J., “Bioprinting of Hybrid Tissue Constructs with Tailorable Mechanical Properties,” Biofabrication, Vol. 3, No. 2, Paper No. 021001, 2011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shim, J.-H., Lee, J.-S., Kim, J. Y., and Cho, D.-W., “Bioprinting of a Mechanically Enhanced Three-Dimensional Dual Cell-Laden Construct for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering Using a Multi-Head Tissue/Organ Building System,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol. 22, No. 8, Paper No. 085014, 2012.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Vlierberghe, S., Dubruel, P., and Schacht, E., “Biopolymer-Based Hydrogels as Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Review,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1387–1408, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, X., Smith, L. A., Hu, J., and Ma, P. X., “Biomimetic Nanofibrous Gelatin/Apatite Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2252–2258, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, M., Guo, Y., Wei, Y., MacDiarmid, A. G., and Lelkes, P. I., “Electrospinning Polyaniline-Contained Gelatin Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering Applications,” Biomaterials, vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 2705–2715, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lien, S.-M., Ko, L.-Y., and Huang, T.-J., “Effect of Pore Size on ECM Secretion and Cell Growth in Gelatin Scaffold for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 670–679, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering, School of Life SciencesUlsan National Institute of Science and TechnologyUlsanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringKyungnam UniversityGyeongsangnam-doRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations