Seals Based on Magnetic Fluids for High Precision Spindles of Machine Tools

  • Harkaitz Urreta
  • Gorka Aguirre
  • Pavel Kuzhir
  • Luis Norberto Lopez de Lacalle
Regular Paper


The research work reported in this paper is focused on the use of magnetic fluids as active elements in seals for improving sealing capacity and minimizing friction torque, with application to the spindles of high precision machine tools. The prototype design was optimized following numerical computation of the magnetic field in the rings of the seal. Two magnetic fluids were analyzed for their use in the seals: a ferrofluid and magnetorheological fluid. The sealing capacity of the MRF based seals was higher than 45 kPa per ring, but the friction of the seal in the bearing was 8 N·m, too large for the use in precision spindles of machine tools because of the energy consumption and heat generation. The ferrofluid seal achieved sealing capacity around 9 kPa per ring, good enough to be used in the spindles of machine tools, with a friction 0.25 N·m and low energy consumption. The feasibility of using ferrofluids for developing high performance seals for high precision spindles and the validity of the simulation models has been demonstrated experimentally.


Precision spindle Magnetic fluid sealing Ferrofluids Magnetorheological fluids Machine tool spindle 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Slocum, A. H., “Precision Machine Design,” Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bassani, R. and Piccigallo, B., “Hydrostatic Lubrication,” Elsevier, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Müller, H. K. and Nau, B. S., “Fluid Sealing Technology: Principles and Applictions,” CRC Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vance, J. M., “Rotordynamics of Turbomachinery,” John Wiley & Sons, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirano, T., Guo, Z., and Kirk, R. G., “Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis for Rotating Machinery -Part II: Labyrinth Seal Analysis,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 127, No. 4, pp. 820–826, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu, X., He, S., and Cai, R., “Frictional Characteristics of Mechanical Seals with a Laser-Textured Seal Face,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 129, Nos. 1-3, pp. 463–466, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, X. and Yamaguchi, A., “Characteristics of Hydrostatic Bearing/ Seal Parts for Water Hydraulic Pumps and Motors. Part 1: Experiment and Theory,” Tribology International, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 425–433, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Odenbach, S. and Thurm, S., “Magnetoviscous Effects in Ferrofluids,” in: Ferrofluids, Odenbach S. (Ed.), Springer, Vol. 594, pp. 185–201, 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carlson, J. D., Catanzarite, D., and St. Clair, K., “Commercial Magneto-Rheological Fluid Devices,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, Vol. 10, Nos. 23-24, pp. 2857–2865, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walowit, J. A. and Pinkus, O., “Analysis of Magnetic-Fluid Seals,” ASLE Transactions, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 533–541, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park, G.-S., Kim, D.-H., Hahn, S.-Y., and Lee, K.-S., “Numerical Algorithm for Analyzing the Magnetic Fluid Seals,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 3351–3354, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zou, J., Li, X., Lu, Y., and Hu, J., “Numerical analysis on the Action of Centrifuge Force in Magnetic Fluid Rotating Shaft Seals,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 252, pp. 321–323, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meng, Z., Jibin, Z., and Jianhui, H., “An Analysis on the Magnetic Fluid Seal Capacity,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 303, No. 2, pp. e428–e431, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lavrova, O., Matthies, G., Mitkova, T., Polevikov, V., and Tobiska, L., “Numerical Treatment of Free Surface Problems in Ferrohydrodynamics,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 18, No. 38, pp. S2657–2699, 2006.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuzhir, P., “Free Boundary of Lubricant Film in Ferrofluid Journal Bearings,” Tribology International, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 256–268, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ravaud, R., Lemarquand, G., and Lemarquand, V., “Magnetic Pressure and Shape of Ferrofluid Seals in Cylindrical Structures,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 106, No. 3, Paper No. 034911, 2009.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iyengar, V. R., Alexandridis, A. A., Tung, S. C., and Rule, D. S., “Wear Testing of Seals in Magneto-Rheological Fluids©,” Tribology Transactions, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 23–28, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horak, W. and Szczech, M., “Experimental and Numerical Determination of the Static Critical Pressure in Ferrofluid Seals,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 412, No. 1, Paper No. 012055, 2013.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szczech, M. and Horak, W., “Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation of the Critical Pressure Value in Ferromagnetic Fluid Seals,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 53, No. 7, pp. 1–5, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park, C.-W., Kwon, K.-S., Kim, W.-B., Min, B.-K., Park, S.-J., et al., “Energy Consumption Reduction Technology in Manufacturing -A Selective Review of Policies, Standards, and Research,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 151–173, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IK4-IDEKODepartment of Design and Precision Engineering, Arriaga 2Elgoibar, Basque CountrySpain
  2. 2.University Côte d’Azur, CNRS UMR 7010 Inst. of Physics of Nice, Parc ValroseNiceFrance
  3. 3.EHU-UPV Department of Mechanical Engineering, Alameda Urquijo S/NBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations