Morphological, Structural and Optical Evolution of Ag Nanostructures on c-Plane GaN Through the Variation of Deposition Amount and Temperature
- 59 Downloads
Owing to their tunable properties, Ag nanostructures have been widely adapted in various applications and the morphological control can determine their performance and effectiveness. In this work, we demonstrate the morphological and optical evolution of Ag nanostructures on GaN (0001) by the systematic control of deposition amount at two distinctive annealing temperatures. Based on the Volmer–Weber and coalescence growth models, the nanostructure growth commenced by the thermal solid-state-dewetting evolve in terms of size, density and configuration. At 450 °C, the round-dome shaped Ag nanoparticles (regime I), irregular Ag nano-mounds (regime II) and void-layer structures (regime III) are observed along with the gradually increased deposition amount. As a sharp distinction, the solid state dewetting process occur more radically at 700 °C and also, the Ag sublimation and the effect on the nanostructure formation are observed in a clear regime shift scaled by the deposition amount. Meanwhile, a strong dependency of reflectance spectra evolution on the Ag nanostructure morphology is witnessed for both sets. In particular, Ag dipolar resonance peaks are significantly red-shifted from VIS to NIR regions along with the nanostructure evolution. The reflectance, PL and Raman intensity variation are also observed and discussed based on the evolution of Ag nanostructures.
KeywordsAg nanostructures GaN Solid-state-dewetting Deposition amount Temperature variation
Financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (Nos. 2011-0030079 and 2016R1A1A1A05005009), and in part by the research grant of Kwangwoon University in 2017 is gratefully acknowledged.
- 9.Z. Sun, D. Teng, L. Liu, X. Huang, X. Zhang, K. Sun, Y. Wang, N. Chi, G. Wang, IEEE Photonics J. 8, 7904308 (2016)Google Scholar
- 35.U. Kreibig, M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metal Clusters (Springer, Berlin, 2013)Google Scholar
- 37.Md Mijanur Rahman, Nampei Hattori, Xu Yuta Nakagawa, Shiki Yagai Lin, Masatoshi Sakai, Kazuhiro Kudo, Kazunuki Yamamoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 11 (2014)Google Scholar
- 50.N. Yoshimura, Vacuum Technology: Practice for Scientific Instruments (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 156–157Google Scholar