Hybrid fuzzy inference system for evaluating lean product development practice

Original Paper
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, a hybrid model which is based on fuzzy inference system (FIS) and fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS) is proposed for the holistic evaluation, integration and implementation of the lean practice in the product development process using an automotive related company as the case company. The main contribution of the study includes; the evaluation of the effects of product quality, product value, development time and development cost on the lean practice and strategy in the product development environment which the authors believe is the first in this area. The development of a hybrid model which is based on FIS and FTOPSIS, for the holistic evaluation of lean practices in the product development process which also provide a framework for the implementation of lean practices when quality, product value, development time and cost are considered. The used of two distance methods for FTOPSIS model analysis, which effectively eliminates the bias of using a single distance method and finally the introduction of a new reflection defuzzification integration formula which serves as an interface between the FIS and FTOPSIS methods. To prove the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid model, it has been compared with a similar computational model in literature.

Keywords

Lean product development Fuzzy inference system Fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution Triangular fuzzy number Reflection defuzzification integration formula 

References

  1. Aikhuele DO, Turan FM (2016a) A hybrid fuzzy model for lean product development performance measurement. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 114(1):012048.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aikhuele DO, Turan FM (2016b) Proposal for a conceptual model for evaluating lean product development performance: a study of LPD enablers in manufacturing companies. In: 2nd International manufacturing engineering conference and 3rd Asia-Pacific conference on manufacturing systems (Imec-Apcoms 2015), vol 114.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012047
  3. Aikhuele DO, Turan FBM (2016c) Intuitionistic fuzzy-based model for failure detection. SpringerPlus 5(1):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3446-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aikhuele DO, Turan FBM (2017). An integrated fuzzy dephi and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy M-Topsis model for design concept selection. Pak J Stat Oper Res 2:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-ashaab A, Andino A, Summers M (2013) Lean product development performance measurement tool. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on manufacturing research (ICMR2013) advances in manufacturing technology XXVII: 19–20 September 2013. Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK, (September), 19–20Google Scholar
  6. Al-ashaab BYA, Golob M, Oyekan J, Araci ZC, Khan M, Deli D, Al-ali E (2014) Flying into aerospace’s next generation (A knowledge shelf. Set-based design,Trade-off curves. These are the lean enablers paving the way), Institute of Industrial Engineers, pp 38–44Google Scholar
  7. Al-Ashaab A, Golob M, Urrutia UA, Gourdin M, Petritsch C, Summers M, El-Nounu A (2015) Development and application of lean product development performance measurement tool. Int J Comput Integr Manuf.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2015.1066858 (October) Google Scholar
  8. Behzadian M, Otaghsara KS, Yazdani M, Ignatius J (2012) A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Syst Appl 39(17):13051–13069.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carulli M, Bordegoni M, Cugini U (2013) An approach for capturing the voice of the customer based on virtual prototyping. J Intell Manuf 24:887–903.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0662-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chase JP (2000) Measuring value in product development. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen C-T (2000) Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 114:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (2007) Winning businesses in product development: the critical success factors. Res Technol Manag 50:52–66. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34249046072&partnerID=40&md5=a4f69c645cc4949765fb19b82d5be0f9. Accessed 12 July 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doolen TL, Hacker ME (2005) A review of lean assessment in organizations: an exploratory study of lean practices by electronics manufacturers. J Manuf Syst 24(1):55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Echtelt F Van, Wynstra F (2001) Managing supplier integration into product development: a literature review and conceptual model. The Future of Innovation Studies, 1–22. http://cms.tm.tue.nl/Ecis/Files/papers/wp2002/eciswp55.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2003
  15. Forno AJD, Forcellini FA, Kipper LM, Pereira FA (2016) Method for evaluation via benchmarking of the lean product development process: multiple case studies at Brazilian companies. Benchmark Int J 22(4):792–816.  https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2013-0114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gu X, Angelov PP, Kangin D, Principe JC (2017) A new type of distance metric and its use for clustering. Evol Syst 8(3):167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guha D, Chakraborty D (2010) A new approach to fuzzy distance measure and similarity measure between two generalized fuzzy numbers. Appl Soft Comput 10:90–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haque B, Moore MJ (2004) Measures of performance for lean product introduction in the aerospace industry. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 218(10):1387–1398.  https://doi.org/10.1243/0954405042323496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horikawa SI, Furuhashi T, Uchikawa Y (1992) On fuzzy modeling using fuzzy neural networks with the back-propagation algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Publ IEEE Neural Netw Counc 3(5):801–806.  https://doi.org/10.1109/72.159069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Joshi D, Kumar S (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making. Egypt Inform J 15(2):97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2014.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jurado MC (2012) Visual planning in lean product development. Master ThesisGoogle Scholar
  23. Karim M, Ernst M, Amin M (2012) A method for evaluating lean assembly process at design stage. In: Proceedings of the The 9th global conference on sustainable manufacturing, Springer, LENEXPO Exhibition Center, St. Petersburg, 169–174Google Scholar
  24. Kazeminezhad MH, Etemad-Shahidi A, Mousavi SJ (2005) Application of fuzzy inference system in the prediction of wave parameters. Ocean Eng 32(14–15):1709–1725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan M, Al-Ashaab A (2013) Towards lean product and process development. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 26(12):1105–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2011.608723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim BY, Kang BK (2008) Cross-functional cooperation with design teams in new product development. Int J Des 2(3):43–54Google Scholar
  27. Li M (2013) A multi-criteria group decision making model for knowledge management system selection based on TOPSIS with multiple distances in fuzzy environment. Kybernetes 42(8):1218–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1108/K-05-2013-0095 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maksimovic M, Al-Ashaab A, Sulowski R, Shehab E (2012). Knowledge visualization in product development using trade-off curves. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp 708–711.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2012.6837831
  29. Petersen KJ, Handfield RB, Ragatz GL (2003) A model of supplier integration into new product development. J Prod Innov Manag 20:284–299.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.00028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petersen KJ, Handfield RB, Ragatz GL (2005) Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. J Oper Manag 23:371–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruben RB, Asokan P, Vinodh S (2017) Performance evaluation of lean sustainable systems using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system: a case study. Int J Sustain Eng 10(3):158–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saunders T, Gao J, Shah S (2014) A case study to evaluate lean product development practices in the global automotive industry. Int J Prod Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2014.064882 Google Scholar
  33. Sopelana A, Flores M, Martinez L, Flores K, Sorli M (2012). The application of an assessment tool for lean product development: an exploratory study in Spanish companies. In: International conference on engineering, technology and innovation, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  34. Stenholm D, Mathiesen H, Bergsjo D (2015) Knowledge based development in automotive industry guided by lean enablers for system engineering. Proc Comput Sci 44:244–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tahriri F, Mousavi M, Haghighi HS, Zawiah Md Dawal S (2014) The application of fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy inference system in supplier ranking and selection. J Ind Eng Int 10(3):66.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-014-0066-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Turan FBM (2013) A three-stage methodology for design evaluation in product development. PhD Thesis, (December)Google Scholar
  37. Venkatamuni T, Rao AR (2010) Evaluating customer preferences in lean product design—an AHP approach. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2(7):3255–3266Google Scholar
  38. Wang X, Shi L, Changqin Z (2011) An interval multiple attribute decision-making model based on TOPSIS and it’s application in smart grid evaluation. In: 2011 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence, management science and electronic commerce (AIMSEC), pp 4948–4951.  https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMSEC.2011.6011006
  39. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EngineeringBells University of TechnologyOtaNigeria

Personalised recommendations