International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 230–238 | Cite as

Classifying Fibromyalgia Syndrome as a Mental Disorder?—An Ambulatory Assessment Study

  • Kristina Klaus
  • Susanne Fischer
  • Johanna M. Doerr
  • Urs M. Nater
  • Ricarda Mewes
Article
  • 365 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is associated with psychological distress. The recent revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) raises the question of whether FMS is classifiable as “somatic symptom disorder” (SSD) and consequently as a mental disorder. To address this, the present ambulatory assessment study focuses on the everyday life occurrence of SSD symptoms in FMS and their predictive value concerning severity indicators of widespread pain.

Method

Ambulatory data were assessed six times daily on 14 consecutive days via iPod. Twenty-eight women suffering from FMS indicated symptoms associated with SSD (somatic illness beliefs, health anxiety, time/energy devoted to pain, or health concerns) and momentary pain levels. Questionnaires regarding potential covariates (such as somatization, depression, health status) were completed at two additional sessions in the research laboratory.

Results

On average, SSD symptoms occurred three to four times daily and were mild to moderate in severity. Furthermore, these symptoms were both concurrently and prospectively associated with momentary pain intensity and subjective impairment by pain. Twenty percent of the variance in pain intensity and 28 % of the variance in subjective impairment were explained by momentary variables (SSD symptoms and intake of pain medication). Eighty-two percent of persons with FMS fulfilled the psychological SSD criterion when considering everyday occurring symptoms with at least mild severity.

Conclusion

FMS might be diagnosed as a mental disorder according to DSM-5 in many cases. SSD symptoms proved to have predictive value for FMS severity and may thus have clinical relevance for diagnostic, prognostic, and intervention purposes.

Keywords

Ambulatory assessment Fibromyalgia syndrome Health anxiety Somatic illness beliefs Somatic symptom disorder 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the local institutional review board (Department of Psychology, University of Marburg, Germany). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

The authors acknowledge funding by the Volkswagen Foundation and the Swiss National Science Foundation. Participant reimbursements were funded by the Philipps-Universität Marburg.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Häuser W, Zimmer C, Felde E, Köllner V. What are the key symptoms of fibromyalgia? Results of a survey of the German Fibromyalgia Association. Schmerz. 2008;22:176–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoffman DL, Dukes EM. The health status burden of people with fibromyalgia: a review of studies that assessed health status with the SF-36 or the SF-12. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:115–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knight T, Schaefer C, Chandran A, Zlateva G, Winkelmann A, Perrot S. Health-resource use and costs associated with fibromyalgia in France, Germany, and the United States. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013;5:171–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Warren JW, Clauw DJ. Functional somatic syndromes: sensitivities and specificities of self-reports of physician diagnosis. Psychosom Med. 2012;74:891–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McBeth J, Macfarlane GJ, Hunt IM, Silman AJ. Risk factors for persistent chronic widespread pain: a community-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40:95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muller A, Hartmann M, Eich W. Health care utilization in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Schmerz. 2000;14:77–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fink P, Rosendal M, Olesen F. Classification of somatization and functional somatic symptoms in primary care. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39:772–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Häuser W, Henningsen P. Fibromyalgia syndrome: a somatoform disorder? Eur J Pain. 2014;18:1052–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henningsen P, Zipfel S, Herzog W. Management of functional somatic syndromes. Lancet. 2007;369:946–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroenke K. Somatoform disorders and recent diagnostic controversies. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2007;30:593–619.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fink P, Schröder A. One single diagnosis, bodily distress syndrome, succeeded to capture 10 diagnostic categories of functional somatic syndromes and somatoform disorders. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68:415–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yunus MB. Central sensitivity syndromes: a new paradigm and group nosology for fibromyalgia and overlapping conditions, and the related issue of disease versus illness. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2008;37:339–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (5th ed.; DSM-5). Arlingten, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ebner-Priemer UW, Trull TJ. Ambulatory assessment: an innovative and promising approach for clinical psychology. Eur Psychol. 2009;14:109–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolfe F, Braehler E, Hinz A, Haeuser W. Fibromyalgia prevalence, somatic symptom reporting, and the dimensionality of polysymptomatic distress: results from a survey of the general population. Arthrit Care Res. 2013;65:777–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RS, Mease P, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Winfield JB. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1113–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Häuser W, Jung E, Erbslöh-Möller B, Gesmann M, Kühn-Becker H, Petermann F, Langhorst J, Weiss T, Winkelmann A, Wolfe F. Validation of the Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire within a cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Offenbaecher M, Waltz M, Schoeps P. Validation of a German version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-G). J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1984–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Zipfel S, Herzog W. PHQ-D - Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten [German version of the Patient Health Questionnaire]. Karlsruhe: Pfizer; 2002.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Loewe B. The Patient Health Questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32:345–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:258–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woltman H, Feldstain A, MacKay JC, Rocchi M. An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. TQMP. 2012;8:52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brosschot JF, Aarsse HR. Restricted emotional processing and somatic attribution in fibromyalgia. Int J Psychiat Med. 2001;31:127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Wilgen CP, van Ittersum MW, Kaptein AA, van Wijhe M. Illness perceptions in patients with fibromyalgia and their relationship to quality of life and catastrophizing. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3618–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cedraschi C, Girard E, Luthy C, Kossovsky M, Desmeules J, Allaz A-F. Primary attributions in women suffering fibromyalgia emphasize the perception of a disruptive onset for a long-lasting pain problem. J Psychosom Res. 2013;74:265–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tuzer V, Bulut SD, Bastug B, Kayalar G, Goka E, Bestepe E. Causal attributions and alexithymia in female patients with fibromyalgia or chronic low back pain. Nord J Psychiat. 2011;65:138–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Epstein SA, Kay G, Clauw D, Heaton R, Klein D, Krupp L, Kuck J, Leslie V, Masur D, Wagner M, Waid R, Zisook S. Psychiatric disorders in patients with fibromyalgia. A multicenter investigation. Psychosomatics. 1999;40:57–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sansone RA, Levengood JV, Sellbom M. Psychological aspects of fibromyalgia: research vs. clinician impressions. J Psychosom Res. 2004;56:185–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robbins JM, Kirmayer LJ, Kapusta MA. Illness worry and disability in fibromyalgia syndrome. Int J Psychiat Med. 1990;20:49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sánchez AI, Martínez MP, Miró E, Medina A. Predictors of the pain perception and self-efficacy for pain control in patients with fibromyalgia. Span J Psychol. 2011;14:366–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aggarwal VR, McBeth J, Zakrzewska JM, Lunt M, Macfarlane GJ. The epidemiology of chronic syndromes that are frequently unexplained: do they have common associated factors? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:468–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen AT. Information seeking over the course of illness: the experience of people with fibromyalgia. Musculoskeletal Care. 2012;10:212–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sanchez RJ, Uribe C, Li H, Alvir J, Deminski M, Chandran A, Palacio A. Longitudinal evaluation of health care utilization and costs during the first three years after a new diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27:663–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berger A, Sadosky A, Dukes E, Martin S, Edelsberg J, Oster G. Characteristics and patterns of healthcare utilization of patients with fibromyalgia in general practitioner settings in Germany. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:2489–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Al-Allaf AW. Work disability and health system utilization in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. JCR-J Clin Rheumatol. 2007;13:199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hazlett RL, Haynes SN. Fibromyalgia: a time-series analysis of the stressor-physical symptom association. J Behav Med. 1992;15:541–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Karsdorp PA, Vlaeyen JWS. Active avoidance but not activity pacing is associated with disability in fibromyalgia. Pain. 2009;147:29–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nicholl BI, Macfarlane GJ, Davies KA, Morriss R, Dickens C, McBeth J. Premorbid psychosocial factors are associated with poor health-related quality of life in subjects with new onset of chronic widespread pain—results from the EPIFUND study. Pain. 2009;141:119–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kirmayer LJ, Taillefer S. Somatoform disorders. In: Turner SM, Hersen M, editors. Adult psychopathology and diagnosis. New York: John Wiley; 1997.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Okifuji A, Turk DC. Fibromyalgia: search for mechanism and effective treatment. In: Gatchel RJ, Turk DC, editors. Psychosocial factors in pain: critical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. p. 227–46.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rief W, Martin M. How to use the new DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder diagnosis in research and practice: a crititcal evaluation and a proposal for modifications. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:339–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Häuser W, Burgmer M, Köllner V, Schaefert R, Eich W, Hausteiner-Wiehle C, Henningsen P. Fibromyalgia syndrome as a psychosomatic disorder—diagnosis and therapy according to current evidence-based guidelines. Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2013;59:132–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Häuser W, Thieme K, Turk DC. Guidelines on the management of fibromyalgia syndrome—a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:5–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Maas CJM, Hox JJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Eur J Res Method Behav Soc Sci. 2005;1:86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fahrenberg J, Myrtek M, Pawlik K, Perrez M. Ambulatory assessment—monitoring behavior in daily life settings. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2007;23:206–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Häuser W, Schild S, Kosseva M, Hayo S, von Wilmowski H, Alten R, et al. Validation of the German version of the Regional Pain Scale for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome. Schmerz. 2010;24:226–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristina Klaus
    • 1
  • Susanne Fischer
    • 2
  • Johanna M. Doerr
    • 2
  • Urs M. Nater
    • 2
  • Ricarda Mewes
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of PsychologyUniversity of MarburgMarburgGermany
  2. 2.Clinical Biopsychology, Department of PsychologyUniversity of MarburgMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations