The Key Role of Pain Catastrophizing in the Disability of Patients with Acute Back Pain
This study investigated the role of anxiety sensitivity, resilience, pain catastrophizing, depression, pain fear-avoidance beliefs, and pain intensity in patients with acute back pain-related disability.
Two hundred and thirty-two patients with acute back pain completed questionnaires on anxiety sensitivity, resilience, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, depression, pain intensity, and disability.
A structural equation modelling analysis revealed that anxiety sensitivity was associated with pain catastrophizing, and resilience was associated with lower levels of depression. Pain catastrophizing was positively associated with fear-avoidance beliefs and pain intensity. Depression was associated with fear-avoidance beliefs, but was not associated with pain intensity. Finally, catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, and pain intensity were positively and significantly associated with acute back pain-related disability.
Although fear-avoidance beliefs and pain intensity were associated with disability, the results showed that pain catastrophizing was a central variable in the pain experience and had significant direct associations with disability when pain was acute. Anxiety sensitivity appeared to be an important antecedent of catastrophizing, whereas the influence of resilience on the acute back pain experience was limited to its relationship with depression.
KeywordsAcute pain Anxiety sensitivity Fear-avoidance beliefs Catastrophizing Resilience Disability
This research was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PSI2008-01803/PSIC) and the Andalusian Regional Government (HUM-566; P07-SEJ-3067).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 7.Reiss S, McNally RJ. Expectancy model of fear. In: Reiss S, Bootzin RR, editors. Theoretical issues in behaviour therapy. San Diego: Academic Press; 1985. p. 107–21.Google Scholar
- 8.Asmundson GJG, Norton PJ, Vlaeyen JWS. Fear-avoidance models of chronic pain: an overview. In: Asmundson GJG, Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G, editors. Understanding and treating fear of pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 3–24.Google Scholar
- 27.Peters ML, Vancleef LMG. The role of personality traits in pain perception and disability. Reviews in analgesia. 2008;10:11–22.Google Scholar
- 41.Peterson RA, Reiss S. Anxiety sensitivity index Mannual. 2nd ed. Worthington, OH: International Diagnostic Systems; 1992.Google Scholar
- 49.Snaith RP, Zigmond AS. The hospital anxiety and depression scale manual. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson; 1994.Google Scholar
- 54.Bollen KA, Long JS. Introduction. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993.Google Scholar
- 55.Bentler PM. EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.; 2006.Google Scholar
- 56.Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. NY: Guilford Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- 60.Cohen JW. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.Google Scholar
- 75.Waddell G, Main CJ. Beliefs about back pain. In: Waddell G, editor. The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. pp. 187–202.Google Scholar