Influence of Depression and Hostility on Exercise Tolerance and Improvement in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease
- 357 Downloads
Although hostility and depression have been linked to higher cardiac risk and poor prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), there is a lack of research that studies how they may influence the short-term outcomes among patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). This study aimed to investigate the influence of hostility and depression on patients’ exercise tolerance and improvement trajectory in a CR program over 6 weeks.
Participants were 142 patients with CHD, with a mean age of 62 years. Latent growth curve modeling was conducted to determine whether hostility and depression predicted patients’ baseline exercise tolerance and rates of improvement on treadmill, while controlling for age and severity of illness. In addition, analysis was conducted to examine whether depression mediated the influence of hostility on exercise outcomes.
Patients with CHD with higher hostility scores had a lower baseline exercise tolerance and slower rates of improvement over 6 weeks. Depressive symptom severity mediated the influence of hostility on exercise baseline and improvement. Patients with higher hostility were more likely to have more severe depressive symptoms, which in turn were associated with lower baseline exercise tolerance and slower improvement.
While both hostility and depression predicted the exercise outcomes in CR, depression explained the influence of hostility. The findings underscore the importance of addressing psychosocial issues in treatment of CHD patients and provide support for psychosocial interventions in CR to facilitate patients’ recovery.
KeywordsDepression Hostility Exercise tolerance Coronary heart disease Rehabilitation
The authors would like to extend our sincere gratitude to Dr. Charles McCreary and Ms. Frances Weber for their support and assistance in completion of this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Both authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to report.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the IRB of Greater LA VA Hospital.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 9.Balady GJ et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2007;115(20):2675–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Isaksen K et al. Exercise training and cardiac rehabilitation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a review of current literature focusing on safety, effects of exercise training, and the psychological impact of programme participation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(4):804–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation et al. AACVPR/ACCF/AHA 2010 Update: Performance Measures on Cardiac Rehabilitation for Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Services Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians, the American College of Sports Medicine, the American Physical Therapy Association, the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, the Clinical Exercise Physiology Association, the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the Inter-American Heart Foundation, the National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists, the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(14):1159–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Lichtman JH et al. Depression and coronary heart disease: recommendations for screening, referral, and treatment: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Prevention Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: endorsed by the American Psychiatric Association. Circulation. 2008;118(17):1768–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Pardaens S, et al. Comorbidities and Psychosocial Characteristics as Determinants of Dropout in Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015.Google Scholar
- 36.American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR). Guidelines for Cardia Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programs. 5th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2013.Google Scholar
- 40.Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Strycker LA. An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. 2nd ed. Routledge; 2006.Google Scholar
- 42.Bentler PM. EQS structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software; 1995.Google Scholar
- 43.Hu LT, Bentler PM. Evaluation model fit. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modeling. CA: Sage; 1995. p. 76–99.Google Scholar
- 47.Houston BK. Anger, hostility, and psychophysiological reactivity. In: Seigman AW, Smith TW, editors. Anger, Hostility, and the Heart. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1994. p. 97–115.Google Scholar