Advertisement

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 288–293 | Cite as

The Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness 8-Items (SSCI-8) in Patients with Neurological Disorders

  • Sung-Hee Yoo
  • Sung Reul Kim
  • Hyang Sook So
  • Hyang-In Cho Chung
  • Duck Hee Chae
  • Myeong-Kyu Kim
  • Byeong C Kim
  • Man-Seok Park
  • Seung-Han Lee
  • Tai-Seung Nam
  • Helena Correia
  • David Cella
Article
  • 274 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to develop a Korean version of the Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness 8-items (SSCI-8) and then assess its reliability and construct validity among patients with neurological conditions.

Method

Patients diagnosed with stroke, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were recruited. Reliability was assessed for internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to extract potential factors of Korean SSCI-8. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating scores on the Korean SSCI-8 with scores for depression using the Beck Depression Inventory, anxiety using Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and functional ability using the Korean modified Barthel Index (K-MBI), respectively.

Results

Of the total 202 patients enrolled in this study, 119 (58.9 %) were recruited with stroke, 33 (16.3 %) with Parkinson’s disease, and 29 (14.4 %) with epilepsy. The Korean SSCI-8 had a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90). The Korean SSCI-8 retrieved one factor from eight items by the EFA, and all factor loading scores were above 0.70 (0.71–0.84). The Korean SSCI-8 was correlated positively with depression (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and anxiety (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), and negatively with the K-MBI (r = −0.48, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study shows that the Korean SSCI-8 is a unidimensional model, even though it includes items of both enacted and internalized stigma. It is both reliable and valid for assessing stigma among Korean patients with neurological disease.

Keywords

Stigma Validation Reliability Neurological disorders 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a research grant from the Chonnam National University (Grant number: 2013-0846).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Standards

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc; 1963.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H, Carta MG, Schomerus G. Changes in the perception of mental illness stigma in Germany over the last two decades. Eur Psychiatry. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2013.10.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krajewski C, Burazeri G, Brand H. Self-stigma, perceived discrimination and empowerment among people with a mental illness in six countries: Pan European stigma study. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210(3):1136–46. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Molina Y, Ramirez-Valles J. HIV/AIDS stigma: measurement and relationships to psycho-behavioral factors in Latino gay/bisexual men and transgender women. AIDS Care. 2013;25(12):1559–68. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2013.793268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forsgren L, Ghanean H, Jacobsson L, Richter J. On the experience of stigma by persons with epilepsy in Sweden and Iran—a comparative study. Seizure. 2013;22(9):748–51. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2013.05.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Viteva E. Impact of stigma on the quality of life of patients with refractory epilepsy. Seizure. 2013;22(1):64–9. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2012.10.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao D, Choi SW, Victorson D, et al. Measuring stigma across neurological conditions: the development of the stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI). Qual Life Res. 2009;18(5):585–95. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9475-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yap MB, Reavley NJ, Jorm AF. Associations between stigma and help-seeking intentions and beliefs: findings from an Australian national survey of young people. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210(3):1154–60. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sirey JA, Bruce ML, Alexopoulos GS, Perlick DA, Friedman SJ, Meyers BS. Stigma as a barrier to recovery: perceived stigma and patient-rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52(12):1615–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perlick DA, Rosenheck RA, Clarkin JF, et al. Stigma as a barrier to recovery: adverse effects of perceived stigma on social adaptation of persons diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52(12):1627–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burgener SC, Buckwalter K, Perkhounkova Y, Liu MF. The effects of perceived stigma on quality of life outcomes in persons with early-stage dementia: longitudinal findings: Part 2. Dementia (London). 2013. doi: 10.1177/1471301213504202.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perez L, Huang J, Jansky L, et al. Using focus groups to inform the Neuro-QOL measurement tool: exploring patient-centered, health-related quality of life concepts across neurological conditions. J Neurosci Nurs. 2007;39(6):342–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rao D, Feldman BJ, Fredericksen RJ, et al. A structural equation model of HIV-related stigma, depressive symptoms, and medication adherence. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(3):711–6. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9915-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Young WB, Park JE, Tian IX, Kempner J. The stigma of migraine. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054074.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Molina Y, Choi SW, Cella D, Rao D. The stigma scale for chronic illnesses 8-item version (SSCI-8): development, validation and use across neurological conditions. Int J Behav Med. 2013;20(3):450–60. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9243-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W. Multivariate data analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eremenco SL, Cella D, Arnold BJ. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):212–32. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beck AT. Depression: clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects. New York, USA: Harper & Row; 1967.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee YH, Song JY. A study of the reliability and the validity of the BDI, SDS, and MMPI-D scales. Korean J Clin Psychol. 1991;10(1):93–118.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spielberger CD. Anxiety; state-trait process: stress and anxiety. New York, USA: Joan Wiley & Sons; 1975.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim JT, Shin DK. A study based on the standardization of the STAI for Korea. New Med J. 1978;21(11):69–75.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jung HY, Park BK, Shin HS, et al. Development of the Korean version of modified Barthel index (K-MBI): multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 2007;31:283–97.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Franklin SB, Gibson DJ, Robertson PA, Pohlmann JT, Fralish JS. Parallel analysis—a method for determining significant principal components. J Veg Sci. 1995;6(1):99–106. doi: 10.2307/3236261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Corrigan P, Watson A, Barr L. The self-stigma of mental illness: implications for self esteem and self efficacy. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2006;25(9):875–84. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Corrigan PW, Watson AC. The paradox of self stigma and mental illness. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2002;9(1):35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sung-Hee Yoo
    • 1
  • Sung Reul Kim
    • 2
  • Hyang Sook So
    • 1
  • Hyang-In Cho Chung
    • 1
  • Duck Hee Chae
    • 1
  • Myeong-Kyu Kim
    • 3
  • Byeong C Kim
    • 3
  • Man-Seok Park
    • 3
  • Seung-Han Lee
    • 3
  • Tai-Seung Nam
    • 3
  • Helena Correia
    • 4
  • David Cella
    • 4
  1. 1.College of NursingChonnam National UniversityGwangjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.College of NursingChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyChonnam National University Medical SchoolGwangjuRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Freinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations