Abstract
While understanding of domain specific vocabularies is essential in content learning, little research informs teaching practices for glossary learning. This study examines the relationship among vocabulary learning, student autonomy, and course performance through the theoretical framework of self-determination theory and second language acquisition. Undergraduate business law students (n = 209) took weekly online glossary quizzes via a learning management system before coming to the class. Students were divided into two groups where (a) glossary quizzes were required and graded and (b) optional and not graded. There was a significant relationship among the number of quiz attempts and overall course performance. While both groups valued the glossary quiz as a helpful learning activity, students in the required group made more attempts at quizzes (t = 17.029, p < .01), received higher scores (t = 2.841, p < .01), and demonstrated higher perceived competence (t = 5.544, p < .01) in their command of vocabularies than students in the optional group. Also, students who reported more autonomous motivation toward the course made more attempts and received higher scores. Findings suggest required glossary quizzes enhance student engagement with quizzes and further improves content learning. However, the use of glossary quizzes proved effective only when students actually completed these numerous times. Educators are recommended to encourage repeated attempts at glossary quizzes where unfamiliar vocabularies are crucial to content understanding and professional practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aydin, Y. Ç., Güneri, O. Y., Yildirim, F. B., & Çag, P. (2015). Predicting college student success: College engagement and perceived english language proficiency. Çukurova University. Faculty of Education Journal, 44(2), 229.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.
Bloom, P. (2000). Learning, development, and conceptual change. How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Dörnyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences in secondary language acquisition (pp. 137–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Ernst-Slavit, G., & Mason, M. R. (2011). “Words that hold us up”: Teacher talk and academic language in five upper elementary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 22(4), 430–440.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). New York, NY: Springer.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Alison, H. P. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Freeman, Y. S., & Freeman, D. E. (2004). Preview, view, review: Giving multilingual learners access to the curriculum. In L. Hoyt (Ed.), Spotlight on comprehension: Building a literacy of thoughtfulness. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Froiland, J. M., & Oros, E. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 119–132.
Garner, B. A. (2013). Legal writing in plain English: A text with exercises. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643–679.
Heppt, B., Haag, N., Bohme, K., & Stanat, P. (2014). The role of academic-language features for reading comprehension of language-minority students and students from low-SES families. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 61–82.
Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1997). The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 415–435.
Krashen, S. D. (1988). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: The Alemany Press.
McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (1990). Content literacy: A definition and implications. Journal of Reading, 34(3), 184–186.
McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (1993). Teaching through text: A content literacy approach to content area reading. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Melvin, S. P., & Katz, M. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Oxford, R. L., & Scarcella, R. C. (1994). Second language vocabulary learning among adults: State of the art in vocabulary instruction. System, 22(2), 231–243.
Peregoy, S. F., & Boyle, O. F. (1997). Reading, writing, & learning in ESL: A resource book for K-12 teachers. New York: Longman.
Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation & Emotion, 28(2), 147–169.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586.
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219–235). New York, NY: Springer.
Townsend, D. (2015). Who’s using the language? Supporting middle school students with content area academic language. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(5), 376–387.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Introduction: Task-based language-teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K. (2012). Task-based language education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 132–139). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, L. (2009). An empirical study of differences in the use of English vocabulary learning strategies. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(4), 151–192.
Wang, Y., Kao, P., & Liao, H. (2016). The relationship of vocabulary learning strategies and self-efficacy with medical English and terminology. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 122(1), 47–66.
Yang, H. (2008). On teaching strategies in second language acquisition. US-China Education Review, 5(1), 61–67.
Funding
This study was supported by the Research Fund, 2017 of The Catholic University of Korea (Grant No. M-2017-B0014-00008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, E., Harris, R.L.W. The effects of online glossary quizzes and student autonomy on domain vocabulary learning in business law. J Comput High Educ 30, 326–343 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9183-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9183-3