How ready are our students for technology-enhanced learning? Students at a university of technology respond
This study focused on perceived technology knowledge and acceptance of Iranian university students. Survey data were collected from 215 freshmen students of 12 majors from a state university of technology in Tehran, Iran. The survey was comprised of 29 items arranged into two scales, namely technology knowledge and technology acceptance (with three sub-scales: perceived technology self-efficacy, ease of use, and usefulness) as the dependent variables. Descriptive and MANOVA analyses were conducted to explore participants’ perception towards these factors, the possible impact of gender, computer ownership, and major of study as independent variables on technology knowledge and acceptance, and the correlation between the dependent variables. The majority of participants perceived themselves as novice or slightly-better-than-novice users of technology. While the results yielded a generally positive technology self-efficacy, the respondents appeared largely uncertain about usefulness and ease of use of technology. The findings supported that male participants demonstrated more self-efficacy towards technology compared to the females. A statistically significant difference was found in technology knowledge of respondents majoring at computer engineering with the rest of the participants. Further, students with a personal computer demonstrated higher levels of technology knowledge and perceived technology easy to use. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients indicated that technology knowledge positively correlated with the three constructs of technology acceptance. Addressing students’ technology proficiency and acceptance is a critical step for designing and/or redefining technology-enhanced courses and programs.
KeywordsTechnology proficiency Perceived technology usefulness Technology self-efficacy Freshmen students
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Comprehensive National Scientific Plan. (2016). Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution. Retrieved from https://isacmsrt.ir/files/site1/pages/naghshe_jame_elmi.pdf
- Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdottir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015). Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. Computers & Education, 81, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hinton, P. R., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I., & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS explained. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Internet World Stats Usage and Population Statistics. (2017). Iran Internet usage, broadband and telecommunication reports. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/me/ir.htm
- Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Shaikhi Fini, A. A. (2008). Survey on professors and student’s attitude about virtual learning in Iran universities. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 5(4), 252–257.Google Scholar
- Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2015). A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organizational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warschauer, M. (2008). Whither the digital divide? In D. L. Kleinman, K. A. Cloud-Hansen, C. Matta, & J. Handesman (Eds.), Controversies in science and technology: From chromosomes to cosmos (pp. 140–151). New Rochelle, NY: Liebert.Google Scholar
- Yaghoubi, J., Malek Mohammadi, I., Iravani, H., Attaran, M., & Gheidi, A. (2008). Virtual students’ perceptions of e-learning in Iran. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), 89–95.Google Scholar