Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How ready are our students for technology-enhanced learning? Students at a university of technology respond

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focused on perceived technology knowledge and acceptance of Iranian university students. Survey data were collected from 215 freshmen students of 12 majors from a state university of technology in Tehran, Iran. The survey was comprised of 29 items arranged into two scales, namely technology knowledge and technology acceptance (with three sub-scales: perceived technology self-efficacy, ease of use, and usefulness) as the dependent variables. Descriptive and MANOVA analyses were conducted to explore participants’ perception towards these factors, the possible impact of gender, computer ownership, and major of study as independent variables on technology knowledge and acceptance, and the correlation between the dependent variables. The majority of participants perceived themselves as novice or slightly-better-than-novice users of technology. While the results yielded a generally positive technology self-efficacy, the respondents appeared largely uncertain about usefulness and ease of use of technology. The findings supported that male participants demonstrated more self-efficacy towards technology compared to the females. A statistically significant difference was found in technology knowledge of respondents majoring at computer engineering with the rest of the participants. Further, students with a personal computer demonstrated higher levels of technology knowledge and perceived technology easy to use. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients indicated that technology knowledge positively correlated with the three constructs of technology acceptance. Addressing students’ technology proficiency and acceptance is a critical step for designing and/or redefining technology-enhanced courses and programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comprehensive National Scientific Plan. (2016). Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution. Retrieved from https://isacmsrt.ir/files/site1/pages/naghshe_jame_elmi.pdf

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J., Green, T., & Hansen, L. E. (2011). One-to-one laptop teacher education: Does involvement affect candidate technology skills and dispositions? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, R., Thorpe, M., & Conole, G. (2012). Student attitudes toward and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: A technology acceptance model approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, K. M. (2005). Self-efficacy as an evaluation measure for programs in support of online learning literacies for undergraduates. Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatlevik, O. E., Guðmundsdottir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015). Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. Computers & Education, 81, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, P. R., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I., & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS explained. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Internet World Stats Usage and Population Statistics. (2017). Iran Internet usage, broadband and telecommunication reports. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/me/ir.htm

  • Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers & Education, 62, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C. P., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes toward web-based professional development, with relation to Internet self-efficacy and beliefs about web-based learning. Computers & Education, 53, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. J., & Jang, H. Y. (2015). Factors influencing students’ beliefs about the future in the context of tablet-based interactive classrooms. Computers & Education, 89, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 61, 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60, 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowerison, G., Sclater, J., Schmid, R. F., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms. Computers & Education, 47, 465–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, C. (2010). Perceived self-efficacy and technology proficiency in undergraduate college students. Computers & Education, 55, 1614–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk, S., & Peker, D. (2009). Turkish pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ computer related self-efficacies, attitudes, and the relationship between these variables. Computers & Education, 53, 454–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastergiou, M. (2010). Enhancing physical education and sport science students’ self-efficacy and attitudes regarding Information and Communication Technologies through a computer literacy course. Computers & Education, 54, 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, H., Tsai, C. C., & Wu, Y. T. (2006). University students’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the Internet: The role of students’ perceptions of the Internet. Educational Studies, 32(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martinez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 683–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikhi Fini, A. A. (2008). Survey on professors and student’s attitude about virtual learning in Iran universities. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 5(4), 252–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shashaani, L., & Khalili, A. (2001). Gender and computers: Similarities and differences in Iranian college students’ attitudes toward computers. Computers & Education, 37, 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2015). A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organizational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., Milutinovic, V., & Zhou, M. (2016). Modeling Serbian pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A SEM and MIMIC approach. Computers & Education, 94, 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2002). A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 453–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2008). Whither the digital divide? In D. L. Kleinman, K. A. Cloud-Hansen, C. Matta, & J. Handesman (Eds.), Controversies in science and technology: From chromosomes to cosmos (pp. 140–151). New Rochelle, NY: Liebert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, G., & Kabata, K. (2010). Students’ and instructors’ attitudes toward the use of CALL in foreign language teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghoubi, J., Malek Mohammadi, I., Iravani, H., Attaran, M., & Gheidi, A. (2008). Virtual students’ perceptions of e-learning in Iran. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(3), 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamani, B. E., & Gholizadeh Shoghlabad, R. (2010). Acceptance of the Internet by Iranian business management students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), E96–E100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Foreign Languages, Amirkabir University of Technology, No. 424, Hafez Street, Tehran, Iran

    Fatemeh Nami

  2. Department of Foreign Languages, Iran University of Science and Technology, Daneshgah Street, Tehran, Iran

    Shahin Vaezi

Authors
  1. Fatemeh Nami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shahin Vaezi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Nami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nami, F., Vaezi, S. How ready are our students for technology-enhanced learning? Students at a university of technology respond. J Comput High Educ 30, 510–529 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9181-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9181-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation