DNA barcoding of a stowaway reef coral in the international aquarium trade results in a new distribution record

Abstract

Dead corals and limestone boulders that act as substrate for live specimens of marine invertebrates and algae are sold as ‘live rock’ in the international aquarium trade. During a customs inspection of an airfreight shipment of ‘live rock’ at Schiphol Airport (Netherlands), 450 boulders imported from Indonesia were checked for the presence of undeclared organisms. During unpacking, about 50% of the boulders appeared to have small stony corals attached to them. Some of these corals belonged to a species unknown from Indonesia. Mitochondrial COI and nuclear ITS markers revealed 100% and 99.3% match with Polycyathus chaishanensis Lin et al., 2012, a species reported from tidal pools in Taiwan. This new distribution record suggests that despite their easy access, intertidal and shallow subtidal reef coral assemblages (< 1 m depth) may still be underexplored.

Introduction

Tropical sea aquariums are important attractions in zoos around the world but are also kept at homes by numerous hobby aquarists. Consequently, there is a high global demand for ornamental reef fishes and invertebrates in the international aquarium trade (Dee et al. 2014). To mimic coral reef environments, large pieces of coral rock and limestone boulders are mined from coral reef areas and placed in aquariums as decoration and substrate (Padilla and Williams 2004). They are also known to clean sea water in aquaria (Yuen et al. 2009; Li et al. 2017). These boulders are most easily collected from shallow water and reef flats, which can be done by local villagers (Dawson Shepherd et al. 1992; Lovell 2001; Caras and Pasternak 2009). The boulders need to be inhabited and covered by live animals and plants from natural reef environments to serve as artificial reef habitats and are therefore called ‘live rock’ (Best 1997; Wood et al. 2012). These live organisms may belong to encrusting species of bryozoans, calcareous algae, sponges, zoantharians, corals, and other invertebrates that hide in crevices and borings or crawl over the rock surface, such as crustaceans, molluscs, echinoderms, and worms (Parks et al. 2003; Simões et al. 2017). According to CITES regulations (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), such attached specimens should not belong to coral species without proper export and import permits that mention their identity (Best 1997).

There is an extensive international trade in these ‘live rocks’. They originally used to be exported from tropical countries like Fiji, Indonesia, and the Philippines, while the USA trade could get supplies from Florida and Hawaii (Bruckner 2001; Lovell 2001; Parks et al. 2003; Rhyne et al. 2009; Wood et al. 2012). In the last two decades, additional exporting countries have been recorded, such as Australia, Brazil, Cuba, Haiti, Palau, Samoa, Tonga, Vanuatu, and Vietnam, indicating that the harvesting of ‘live rock’ has been widespread due to an increasing economic demand (Table 1; Harriott 2001; Wabnitz et al. 2003; Gasparini et al. 2005; Rhyne et al. 2012; Gurjão and Lotufo 2018). Because organisms dwelling on ‘live rock’ are kept alive when they are transported over large distances, they can form a threat as potential invasive species in new areas (Padilla and Williams 2004; Bolton and Graham 2006; Walters et al. 2006; Morrisey et al. 2011) or as pest species in their new aquarium habitats (Rhyne et al. 2004; Calado and Narciso 2005).

To examine if such attached organisms belong to alien species, DNA barcoding (Hebert et al. 2003) can be applied for their identification (Wehr 2017; Vranken et al. 2018). This method represents a fast, simple, and economic tool to identify organisms based on DNA sequences and has been successfully used, for example, for the discovery of illegal trade and alien species of marine taxa (Collins et al. 2012; Bunholi et al. 2018). It can also be used to check whether imported organisms or products made from them, belong to species that are protected under CITES (Staats et al. 2016). The present study reports on the application of DNA-barcoding methodology to assist in the identification of scleractinian corals from Indonesia that were accidentally imported in the Netherlands.

Material and methods

During a customs inspection of an airfreight shipment of ‘live rock’ at Schiphol Airport (The Netherlands) on 22 October 2012, 450 imported coral boulders from Indonesia were checked for the presence of undeclared organisms (Fig. 1, ESM Figs. S1S6). According to the accompanying documents, the shipment consisted of 80 boxes and had a weight of 4050 kg and a total value of USD 10,600 (including freight costs). The boulders (declared as “natural stone” and “substrate/unidentified scleractinians”) were kept in moist condition inside styrofoam containers, which were packed in cardboard boxes. The packaging was done 2 days before arrival.

Fig. 1
figure1

a Dead coral boulder shipped as ‘live rock’, subject to customs inspection at Schiphol Airport (scale bar: 5 cm); b, c Live specimen of Polycyathus chaishanensis: polyps seen from above (b) and aside (c); d, e Skeleton of the same specimen after cleaning in household bleach; polyps seen from above (d) and aside (e); catalogue nr. RMNH.COEL.42435. Scale bars bd, 5 mm

During unpacking, approximately 50% of the boulders appeared to have small scleractinian corals attached to them (Fig. 1). Some corals belonged to a species unknown from Indonesia, and one of these (Fig. 1b, c), with a colony diameter of 2.8 cm, was sampled and subjected to DNA barcoding for species identification. In detail, DNA extraction was carried out in the molecular laboratory of Naturalis with the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany). Two loci were selected for DNA barcoding, a portion of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI, partially) and a selection of nuclear rDNA (ITS, including the entire ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, and a fragment of 18S and 28S). COI was amplified using primers fungCOIfor1 (5′-CTG CTC TTA GTA TGC TTG TA-3′) and fungCOIrev2 (5′-TTG CAC CCG CTA ATA CAG-3′) (Gittenberger et al. 2011), and ITS using primers ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) (White et al. 1990) and A18S (5′-GAT CGA ACG GTT TAG TGA GG-3′) (Takabayashi et al. 1998). Amplifications were performed in a 12.5-mL PCR reaction mix containing 0.2 mM of each primer, 2 X Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany) and < 0.1 ng of DNA. The thermal cycler profile was of 95 °C for 15 min, 30 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 53 °C for 1 min (50 °C for ITS), 72 °C for 1 min, with a final phase of 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were directly sequenced in forward and reverse directions using an automated 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA). Newly obtained COI and ITS sequences from the analysed specimen were checked via Blast searches against nr GenBank database. Subsequently, they were aligned with closely related coral sequences available in GenBank using MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013) and the iterative refinement method E-INS-i. The phylogenetic trees were obtained using maximum likelihood criterion using RAxML (Stamatakis 2014) with a multiparametric bootstrap analysis of 500 bootstrap replicates. Newly obtained sequences of COI and ITS were deposited in NCBI under the accession numbers MN533979 and MN527240, respectively.

To keep the specimen available for future research, it has been deposited in the scientific reference collection of Naturalis Biodiversity Centre (Leiden, the Netherlands) with catalogue number RMNH.COEL.42435).

Results and discussion

Most corals attached to the imported ‘live rock’ could easily be identified to genus or species level, such as Coeloseris mayeri Vaughan, 1918 and Pavona sp. (both Agariciidae), Cyphastrea sp. and Merulina sp. (both Merulinidae), Montipora sp. (Acroporidae), Psammocora sp. (Psammocoridae), and Porites sp. and Stylaraea punctata (Linnaeus, 1758), both Poritidae. Stylaraea punctata is typical for shallow, intertidal areas (Kitano et al. 2014; Richards et al. 2015), and widespread in Indonesia (Hoeksema 2004).

One species in the investigated shipment was unknown for Indonesia and needed further analysis for its identification. The soft tissue of this coral showed a brown colour (Fig. 1b–d), suggesting that it is zooxanthellate. The thecae of the tubular calices were almost completely covered by encrusting coralline algae (Fig. 1d). Its corallum shape agreed with that of Polycyathus Duncan, 1876 (Caryophylliidae), a genus of 19 recognized species worldwide (Hoeksema and Cairns 2018). Many of these species are exclusively known from deep water, and therefore, all of them are usually considered as azooxanthellate corals (e.g., Cairns et al. 1999; Cairns and Kitahara 2012).

COI and ITS markers revealed a 100% and 99.3% match with specimens of Polycyathus chaishanensis Lin et al., 2012 (ESM Figs. S7S8) collected from its type locality in Taiwan (Lin et al. 2011, 2012). So far, this species has only been recorded from here and two other localities in Taiwan, each time in shallow water from intertidal to 3 m depth (Kuo et al. 2019). The phylogenetic analyses based on both COI and ITS loci showed that our newly obtained sequences clustered together with sequences of P. chaishanensis from Taiwan with high bootstrap values (100 for both analyses). Moreover, the three sequences of P. chaishanensis from Taiwan formed a single lineage with low-moderate bootstrap value (63) in the ITS tree. Therefore, the high value of genetic identity based on Blast searches and the results from the phylogeny reconstructions seem to suggest that our specimen can be identified as P. chaishanensis based on the few molecular data that are actually available. Nevertheless, since molecular information on other Polycyathus species has not yet been published, we suggest the inclusion of more sequences of shallow-water species ascribed to this genus from different localities to get a more complete geographic and taxonomic sampling of this genus for future genetic analyses.

Morphological characters were also studied. The specimen from Indonesia showed calices that are 2.5–3.5 mm wide, with 24–32 septa divided over three to four cycli and a length of 1 cm (Fig. 1b–e). According to its original description, P. chaishanensis shows a maximum calice diameter of 3.7 mm and up to 34 septa in up to four cycli (Lin et al. 2012). Morphologically, it resembles P. hodgsoni Verheij and Best, 1987, which has been recorded from caves at depths over 35 m in the Philippines and the Maldives (Verheij and Best 1987). This species has smaller and shorter calices (2–3 mm in diameter, < 5 mm long) with 20–24 septa divided over three cycli. Other Polycyathus species reported from the central Indo-Pacific have calices that are over 5 mm in diameter: P. fulvus Wijsman-Best, 1970, known from very shallow water (0.3–0.5 m depth) in New Caledonia (Wijsman-Best 1970); P. isabela Wells, 1982 from 14 m depth at Galápagos (Wells 1982); P. furanaenis Verheij & Best, 1987 found in caves at 6–52 m depth (Verheij and Best 1987); P. marigondoni Verheij & Best, 1987, which has been found in a cave at 35 m depth (Verheij and Best 1987); P. andamanensis Alcock, 1893, known from dredges at unknown depths; and P. octoplus Cairns, 1999, dredged from 110 to 441 m depth. With regard to the environment, only P. fulvus with larger polyps appears to share a similar habitat with P. chaishanensis. To obtain a better overview of Polycyathus species, it appears that this genus is in need of a worldwide taxonomic revision, in which molecular, morphological, biogeographic, and bathymetric characteristics are taken into account. It is also important to photograph fresh specimens or examine specimens stored in ethanol to verify whether zooxanthellae are present or not, because for collected specimens, it is usually assumed that they are azooxanthellate, as in the case of Polycyathus fuscomarginatus (Klunzinger, 1879) trawled from 10 to 30 m depth off Chennai, Southern India (Venkataraman 2007).

The question arises whether more distribution records of rarely known coral species can be obtained from customs inspections. Large quantities of ‘live rock’ (mostly from Indonesia) are imported in the Netherlands (Table 1), whereas the total export of ‘live rock’ from Indonesia to other countries in 2012 (the year of the present example) was almost 106 kg (Table 2). How frequently shipments of ‘live rock’ are being inspected by customs officers is not known. Since the imported rocks only need to be inspected for the presence of CITES-listed species at high taxonomic level (mostly Scleractinia spp.), assistance given by a coral taxonomist may not be necessary in this case. On the other hand, the present study can serve as a test case for illustrating the usefulness of DNA barcoding in the identification of protected species or their products, like previously applied to cacti (Gathier et al. 2013), medicinal plants (Eurlings et al. 2013), sharks (Liu et al. 2013; Feitosa et al. 2018), orchids (de Boer et al. 2017), and trees (Yu et al. 2017). Therefore, knowledge on the trafficking of rarely known species in the aquarium trade may benefit from more inspections assisted by expert taxonomists who can select the specimens to be used for DNA barcoding.

Table 1 Import of ‘live rock’ (kg) in the Netherlands from various countries over the years 2009–2018 (CITES 2020)
Table 2 Import of ‘live rock’ in various countries from Indonesia in 2012; * = based on export data from Indonesia (CITES 2020)

It is indeed remarkable that P. chaishanensis has not been reported from other localities despite its occurrence in shallow tidal pools and reef flats, as reported from Taiwan (Lin et al. 2012; Kuo et al. 2019). This scarcity of records suggests that shallow reef habitats in the tropics, despite their easy access, could be understudied and may house more infrequently observed species. Because most coral researchers use SCUBA equipment at depths over 3 m, they may overlook coral species occurring in intertidal and shallow subtidal habitats (< 1 m depth), such as Stylaraea punctata (Linnaeus, 1758) at Guam, which can easily be found in tidal pools on reef flats during low tide (Randall and Myers 1983; Golbuu and Richmond 2007; BWH pers. obs.). Another example is the free-living morphotype of the scleractinian coral Favia gravida Verrill, 1868, which is only known from rocky tide pools of Ascension Island (Hoeksema 2012; Hoeksema and Wirtz 2013). These observations suggest that shallow reef environments can harbour unique coral reef fauna and that future surveys here may result in new species records.

References

  1. Alcock A (1893) On some newly-recorded corals from the Indian Seas. J Asiat Soc Bengal (Nat Hist) 62:138–149

    Google Scholar 

  2. Best MB (1997) Trade in corals and living stones. In: den Hartog JC (ed) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Coelenterate Biology, Noordwijkerhout, 1995. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Leiden, pp 47–52

  3. Bolton TF, Graham WM (2006) Jellyfish on the rocks: bioinvasion threat of the international trade in aquarium live rock. Biol Invasions 8:651–653

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruckner AW (2001) Tracking the trade in ornamental coral reef organisms: the importance of CITES and its limitations. Aquar Sci Conserv 3:79–94

  5. Bunholi IV, da Silva Ferrette BL, De Biasi JB, de Oliveira MC, Rotundo MM, Oliveira C, Foresti F, Mendonça FF (2018) The fishing and illegal trade of the angelshark: DNA barcoding against misleading identifications. Fish Res 206:193–197

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cairns SD (1999) Cnidaria Anthozoa: deep-water azooxanthellate Scleractinia from Vanuatu, and Wallis and Futuna Islands. In: Crosnier A (ed) Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM 20. Mém Mus Natl Hist Nat Sér A Zool 180:31–167

  7. Cairns SD, Kitahara MV (2012) An illustrated key to the genera and subgenera of the recent azooxanthellate Scleractinia (Cnidaria, Anthozoa), with an attached glossary. ZooKeys 227:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cairns SD, Hoeksema BW, van der Land J (1999) List of extant stony corals. Atoll Res Bull 459:13–46

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calado R, Narciso L (2005) Ability of Monaco shrimp Lysmata seticaudata (Decapoda: Hippolytidae) to control the pest glass anemone Aiptasia pallida (Actiniaria: Aiptasidae). Helgol Mar Res 59:163–165

    Google Scholar 

  10. Caras T, Pasternak Z (2009) Long-term environmental impact of coral mining at the Wakatobi marine park, Indonesia. Ocean Coast Manag 52:539–544

    Google Scholar 

  11. CITES (2020) CITES Trade Database. Accessed at: https://trade.cites.org/. Accessed 29-03-2020

  12. Collins RA, Armstrong KF, Meier R, Yi Y, Brown SD, Cruickshank RH, Johnston C (2012) Barcoding and border biosecurity: identifying cyprinid fishes in the aquarium trade. PLoS One 7:e28381

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dawson Shepherd AR, Warwick RM, Clarke KR, Brown BE (1992) An analysis of fish community responses to coral mining in the Maldives. Environ Biol Fish 33:367–380

  14. de Boer HJ, Ghorbani A, Manzanilla V, Raclariu A-C, Kreziou A, Ounjai S, Osathanunkul M, Gravendeel B (2017) DNA metabarcoding of orchid-derived products reveals widespread illegal orchid trade. Proc R Soc B 284:20171182

  15. Dee LE, Horii SS, Thornbill DJ (2014) Conservation and management of ornamental coral reef wildlife: successes, shortcomings, and future directions. Biol Conserv 169:225237

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eurlings MCM, Lens F, Pakusza C, Peelen T, Wieringa JJ, Gravendeel B (2013) Forensic identification of Indian snakeroot (Benth. ex Kurz) using DNA barcoding. J Forensic Sci 58:822–830

  17. Feitosa LM, Martins APB, Giarrizzo T, Macedo W, Monteiro IL, Gemaque R, Nunes JLS, Gomes F, Schneider H, Sampaio I, Souza R, Sales JB, Rodrigues-Filho LF, Tchaicka L, Carvalho-Costa LF, (2018) DNA-based identification reveals illegal trade of threatened shark species in a global elasmobranch conservation hotspot. Sci Rep 8:3347

  18. Gasparini JL, Floeter SR, Ferreira CEL, Sazima I (2005) Marine ornamental trade in Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 14:2883–2899

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gathier G, Niet T, Peelen T, Vugt RR, Eurlings M, Gravendeel B (2013) Forensic identification of CITES protected slimming cactus (Hoodia) using DNA barcoding. J Forensic Sci 58:1467–1471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gittenberger A, Reijnen BT, Hoeksema BW (2011) A molecularly based phylogeny reconstruction of mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) with taxonomic consequences and evolutionary implications for life history traits. Contrib Zool 80:107–132

    Google Scholar 

  21. Golbuu Y, Richmond RH (2007) Substratum preferences in planula larvae of two species of scleractinian corals, Goniastrea retiformis and Stylaraea punctata. Mar Biol 152:639–644

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gurjão LM, Lotufo TMC (2018) Native species exploited by marine aquarium trade in Brazil. Biota Neotrop 18:e20170387

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harriott VJ (2001) The sustainability of Queensland’s coral harvest fishery. CRC Reef Research Centre Technical Report 40. CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville

  24. Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, Dewaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:313–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoeksema BW (2004) Mushroom corals and scleractinian genera. In: Pet-Soede L, Erdmann M (eds) Rapid Ecological Assessment Wakatobi National Park. November 2003. Directorate General of Forest Protection and Nature Conservation, Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta; Marine Program, WWF Indonesia, Bali; The Nature Conservancy. Southeast Asia Center for Marine Protected Areas, Bali, pp 67–76

  26. Hoeksema BW (2012) Extreme morphological plasticity enables a free mode of life in Favia gravida at Ascension Island (South Atlantic). Mar Biodivers 42:289–295

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoeksema BW, Cairns S (2018) World list of Scleractinia. Polycyathus Duncan, 1876. Accessed at: http://www.marinespecies.org/scleractinia/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=135098 on 16-01-2020

  28. Hoeksema BW, Wirtz P (2013) Over 130 years of survival by a small, isolated population of Favia gravida corals at Ascension Island (South Atlantic). Coral Reefs 32:551

    Google Scholar 

  29. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kitano YF, Benzoni F, Arrigoni R, Shirayama Y, Wallace CC, Fukami H (2014) A phylogeny of the family Poritidae (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) based on molecular and morphological analyses. PLoS One 9:e98406

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuo CY, Chung A, Keshavmurthy S, Huang YY, Yang SY, Chen CA (2019) Lonely giant on the sand: unexpected massive Taiwanese coral, Polycyathus chaishanensis in the Datan algal reef demands a conservation focus. Galaxea J Coral Reef Stud 21:11–12

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li Y, Zheng X, Yang X, Ou D, Lin R, Liu X (2017) Effects of live rock on removal of dissolved inorganic nitrogen in coral aquaria. Acta Oceanol Sin 36:87–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin M-F, Luzon KS, Licuanan WY, Ablan-Lagman MC, Chen CA (2011) Seventy-four universal primers for characterizing the complete mitochondrial genomes of scleractinian corals (Cnidaria; Anthozoa). Zool Stud 50:513–524

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin M-F, Kitahara MV, Tachikawa H, Keshavmurthy S, Chen CA (2012) A new shallow-water species, Polycyathus chaishanensis sp. nov. (Scleractinia: Caryophylliidae), from Chaishan, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Zool Stud 51:213–221

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu S-YV, Chan C-LC, Lin O, Hu C-S, Chen CA (2013) DNA barcoding of shark meats identify species composition and CITES-listed species from the markets in Taiwan. PLoS One 8:e79373

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lovell ER (2001) Status report: collection of coral and other benthic reef organisms for the marine aquarium and curio trade in Fiji. World wide Fund for Nature. South Pacific Program, Suva

    Google Scholar 

  37. Morrisey D, Inglis G, Neil K, Bradley A, Fitridge I (2011) Characterization of the marine aquarium trade and management of associated marine pests in Australia, a country with stringent import biosecurity regulation. Environ Conserv 38:89–100

    Google Scholar 

  38. Padilla DK, Williams SL (2004) Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 2:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  39. Parks JE, Pomeroy RS, Balboa CM (2003) The economics of live rock and live coral aquaculture. In: Cati JC, Brown CL (eds) Marine ornamental species: collection, culture, and conservation. Iowa State Press, Ames, pp 185–206

    Google Scholar 

  40. Randall RH, Myers RF (1983) Guide to the coastal resources of Guam 2. The corals. University of Guam Press, Guam

  41. Rhyne AL, Lin J, Deal KJ (2004) Biological control of aquarium pest anemone Aiptasia pallida Verrill by peppermint shrimp Lysmata risso. J Shellfish Res 23:227–229

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rhyne A, Rotjan R, Bruckner A, Tlusty M (2009) Crawling to collapse: ecologically unsound ornamental invertebrate fisheries. PLoS One 4:e8413

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rhyne AL, Tlusty MF, Kaufman L (2012) long-term trends of coral imports into the United States indicate future opportunities for ecosystem and societal benefits. Conserv Lett 5:478–485

    Google Scholar 

  44. Richards ZT, Garcia RA, Wallace CC, Rosser NL, Muir PR (2015) A diverse assemblage of reef corals thriving in a dynamic intertidal reef setting (Bonaparte Archipelago, Kimberley, Australia). PLoS ONE 10:e0117791

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Simões N, Altamira A, Shei M, Perissonotti F (2017) Live rock. In: Calado R, Olivotto I, Oliver MP, Holt GJ (eds) Marine ornamental species aquaculture. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 385–401

    Google Scholar 

  46. Staats M, Arulandhu A, Gravendeel B, Holst-Jensen A, Scholtens I, Peelen T, Prins T, Kok E (2016) Advances in DNA metabarcoding for food and wildlife forensic species identification. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:4615–4630

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML Version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Takabayashi M, Carter DA, Loh WKT, Hoegh-Guldberg O (1998) A coral-specific primer for PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer region in ribosomal DNA. Mol Ecol 7:925–931

    Google Scholar 

  49. Venkataraman K (2007) Azooxanthellate hard corals (Scleractinia) from India. Bull Mar Sci 81(Suppl 1):207–214

    Google Scholar 

  50. Verheij E, Best MB (1987) Notes on the genus Polycyathus Duncan, 1876 and a description of three new scleractinian corals from the indo-Pacific. Zool Med Leiden 61:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vranken S, Bosch S, Peña V, Leliaert F, Mineur F, De Clerck O (2018) A risk assessment of aquarium trade introductions of seaweed in European waters. Biol Invasions 20:1171–1187

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wabnitz C, Taylor M, Green E, Razak T (2003) From ocean to aquarium. UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  53. Walters LJ, Brown KR, Stam WT, Olsen JL (2006) E-commerce and Caulerpa: unregulated dispersal of invasive species. Front Ecol Environ 4:75–79

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wehr GG (2017) Alien invasive risk assessment of the marine aquarium trade in South Africa. Genome 60:1009

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wells JW (1982) Notes on Indo-Pacific scleractinian corals. Part 9. New corals from the Galápagos Islands. Pac Sci 36:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  56. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols. A guide to methods and application. San Diego Academic Press Inc, San Diego, pp 315–322

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wijsman-Best M (1970) A new species of Polycyathus Duncan, 1876 from New Caledonia and a new record of Polycyathus senegalensis Chevalier, 1966 (Madreporaria). Beaufortia 17:79–84

  58. Wood E, Malsch K, Miller J (2012) International trade in hard corals: review of management, sustainability and trends. Proc 12th Int Coral Reef Symp 19C:1–5

  59. Yu M, Jiao L, Guo J, Wiedenhoeft AC, He T, Jiang X, Yin Y (2017) DNA barcoding of vouchered xylarium wood specimens of nine endangered Dalbergia species. Planta 246:1165–1176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yuen YS, Yamazaki SS, Nakamura T, Tokuda G, Yamasaki H (2009) Effects of live rock on the reef-building coral Acropora digitifera cultured with high levels of nitrogenous compounds. Aquac Eng 41:35–43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dutch customs officers and Ate Cohen (Naturalis) for assistance at Schiphol Airport during inspection of the shipment of ‘live rock’, Aline Nieman (Naturalis) for assistance with the lab work, and Francesca Benzoni (KAUST) for her constructive comments on an earlier version of the ms. We are also grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful remarks. The views expressed are purely those of the authors and may, with regard to RA, not in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bert W. Hoeksema.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

No animal testing was performed during this study.

Sampling and field studies

All necessary permits for sampling were obtained by the authors from relevant authorities and are mentioned in the acknowledgements when applicable.

Authors’ contribution

BWH collected the examined specimen at Schiphol Airport. Both authors wrote the manuscript. BWH studied morphological characters. AR performed the molecular analysis. Both authors read and approved the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Communicated by C. Buschbaum

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 1517 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoeksema, B.W., Arrigoni, R. DNA barcoding of a stowaway reef coral in the international aquarium trade results in a new distribution record. Mar. Biodivers. 50, 41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-020-01075-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • CITES
  • Customs
  • Barcoding
  • COI
  • ITS
  • Geographical distribution
  • Indonesia
  • Polycyathus
  • Reef flat
  • Intertidal