Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the effects of reward and competition intensity on participation in crowdsourcing contests

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growth of web 2.0 technology, crowdsourcing contests now offer task-seekers an opportunity to access expertise and resources at a lower cost. Many studies have investigated the effects of influencing factors on solvers’ participation behaviors. However, there has been scant research on the effect of competition intensity and on the relationships between competition and reward. We collect data from the Taskcn website in China to build a two-equation model based on expectation-value theory to explore the effects of task reward and competition intensity on solvers’ registration and submission behaviors. The research results verify that task reward is positively associated with the number of registrations and submissions, and competition intensity is negatively associated with solvers’ submissions. In addition, the empirical results show that competition intensity moderates the relationship between task reward and submissions. These findings provide valuable contributions to the literature on crowdsourcing contests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20(1), 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archak, N., & Sundararajan, A. (2009). Optimal design of crowdsourcing contests. ICIS 2009 Proceedings.

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(61), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2013). Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57(5), 843–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D. C. (2008a). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D. C. (2008b). Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. First Monday, 13(6), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D. C. (2010). Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1122–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Ho, T.-H., & Kim, Y.-M. (2010). Knowledge market design: A field experiment at Google answers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(4), 641–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-M., & Wang, E. (2008). Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45, 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPalantino, D., & Vojnovic, M. (2009). Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, 119–128.

  • Horton, J. J., & Chilton, L. B. (2010). The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. ACM, 209–218

  • Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T., & Veit, D. (2011). More than fun and money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing-A Study on Mechanical Turk. Paper presented at the AMCIS.

  • Leimeister, J. M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. X., Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Chen, Y. (2014). Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on taskcn. Management Science, 60(8), 2020–2037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K.-T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1058–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy× value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Fang, Y., & Lim, K. H. (2012). Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwiesch, C., & Xu, Y. (2008). Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54(9), 1529–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. 1964. NY: John Wiley &sons, 47–51.

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. Handbook of Motivation at School, 55–75.

  • Wu, C.-G., Gerlach, J., & Young, C. (2007). An empirical analysis of open source software developers' motivations and continuance intentions. Information & Management, 44(3), 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Adamic, L. A., & Ackerman, M. S. (2008a). Competing to share expertise: The taskcn knowledge sharing community. Paper presented at the ICWSM, 161–169.

  • Yang, J., Adamic, L.A., & Ackerman, M.S. (2008b). Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: strategic user behavior on taskcn. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, 246–255

  • Yang, Y., Chen, P.-Y., & Pavlou, P. (2009). Open innovation: An empirical study of online contests. Paper presented at ICIS, 1–16.

  • Zhao, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2014). Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(3), 417–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H., Li, D., & Hou, W. (2011). Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors highly appreciate the Senior Editor Doug Vogel and Judith Gebauer and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. All errors remain ours.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harbin Institute of Technology, No. 92, West Da Zhi Street, Harbin, Heilongjiang province, China

    Dan Li & Longying Hu

Authors
  1. Dan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Longying Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Li.

Additional information

Responsible Editors: Doug Vogel and Judith Gebauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Hu, L. Exploring the effects of reward and competition intensity on participation in crowdsourcing contests. Electron Markets 27, 199–210 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0252-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0252-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation