Skip to main content

Towards a typology of structural arrangements for shared services: evidence from the higher education sector

Abstract

Shared services are increasingly prevalent in practice, their introduction potentially entailing substantive and highly consequential organizational redesign. Yet, attention to the structural arrangements of shared services has been limited. This study explores types of structural arrangements for shared services that are observed in practice, and the salient dimensions along which those types can be usefully differentiated. Through inductive attention to the shared services literature, and content analysis of 36 secondary case studies of shared services in the higher education sector, three salient dimensions emerged: (1) the existence or not of a separate organizational entity, (2) an intra- or inter-organizational sharing boundary, and (3) involvement or not of a third party. Each dimension being dichotomous yields 23 combinations, or eight shared services structural arrangement types. Each of the eight structural arrangement types is defined and demonstrated through case examples. The typology offers clarity around shared services structural arrangements. It can serve as a useful analytical tool for researchers investigating the phenomenon further, and for practitioners considering the introduction or further development of shared services arrangements. Important follow on research is suggested too.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    We also integrated other synonyms for ‘University’ to check for completeness of information collected and found that the search term used as above captured all of the relevant information.

References

  1. Albrecht, B., Goldstein, P. J., Pirani, J. A., & Spicer, D. Z. (2004). Shared services: three examples of multi-institutional collaboration. ECAR: Educause Center for Applied Research. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ers0407/cs/ECS0409.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2012.

  2. Amos, S., & Mihulka, D. (2008). Extending Shared Services Across Multiple Entities at the University of Nebraska. Paper presented at the EDUCAUSE Annual Conference,

  3. Arya, D. K. (2011). Shared services arrangement in a decentralising healthcare environment – will it work? Australian Health Review, 35, 290–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bækgaard, L. (2009). Service Scenarios - A Socio-Technical Approach to Business Service Modeling. Paper presented at the 17th European Conference on Information Systems,

  5. Becker, J., Niehaves, B., & Krause, A. (2009). Shared services strategies and their determinants: a multiple case study analysis in the public sector. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. San Francisco, California.

  6. Bergeron, B. (2003). Essentials of Shared Services. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borman, M. (2008a). The design and success of shared services centres. Proceedings of the16th European Conferences on Information Systems. Galway, Ireland.

  8. Borman, M. (2008b). Understanding the Influence of the Providers’ Organizational and Environmental Context on the Success of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Seeking to Access the Benefits of Outsourcing Through Aggregation. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-11).

  9. Borman, M. (2010). The formation of shared services partnerships in local government to manage resource dependencies. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Lima, Peru.

  10. Borman, M., & Ulbrich, F. (2011). Managing Dependencies in Inter-Organizational Collaboration: The Case of Shared Services for Application Hosting Collaboration in Australia. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

  11. Burke, J. C. (2005). The many faces of accountability. In J. C. Burke (Ed.), Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic, and market demands (pp. 1–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell, J., McDonald, C., & Sethibe, T. (2009). Public and Private Sector IT Governance: Identifying Contextual Differences. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. CAUDIT 2010 Annual Report (2010). Yarralumla ACT: Council of Australian University Directors of Information Technology.

  14. Chua, C. E. H., Wareham, J., & Robey, D. (2007). The Role of Online Trading Communities in Managing Internet Auction Fraud. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 759–781.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Flinders University of South Australia, & University of South Australia (2001). Shared Services Initiative: A joint initiative of the University of South Australia and the Flinders University of South Australia. In Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs (Ed.). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

  16. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a Unique Form of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dove, C.S. (2004). The Shared Service Center: A Model for University Efficiency? . University of Pennsylvania,

  18. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eckel, P. D., & Hartley, M. (2008). Developing Academic Strategic Alliances: Reconciling Multiple Institutional Cultures, Policies, and Practices. Journal of Higher Education, 79(6), 613–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fiserv (2009). White Paper: Achieving Operational Transformation: Leveraging Your Shared Service Environment to Move from Transactional Support to Strategic Decision Support. http://www.fiserv.com/WP_shared-services.pdf. Accessed June 2011.

  21. Gibson, M., & Arnott, D. (2005). The Evaluation of Business Intelligence: A Case Study in a Major Financial Institution. Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Sydney.

  22. Goh, M., Prakash, S., & Yeo, R. (2007). Resource-based approach to IT shared services in a manufacturing firm. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(2), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goold, M., Pettifer, D., & Young, D. (2001). Redesigning the Corporate Centre. European Management Journal, 19(1), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gospel, H., & Sako, M. (2010). The unbundling of corporate functions: the evolution of shared services and outsourcing in human resource. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(5), 1367–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffman, T. (2002). IT's role in shared services remains unclear. http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/30243/it_role_shared_services_remains_unclear/. Accessed June 2011.

  27. Janssen, M., & Joha, A. (2006). Motives for establishing shared service centers in public administrations. International Journal of Information Management, 26, 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Janssen, M., & Joha, A. (2008). Emerging shared service organizations and the service-oriented enterprise. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 1(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keall, C. (2009). Auckland Uni sticks with Microsoft - to be on the right side of the law. http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/auckland-uni-sticks-with-microsoft-be-right-side-law-61197. Accessed 15 March 2012.

  31. Knight, G., & Hedges, M. (2007). Modelling OAIS Compliance for Disaggregated Preservation Services. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 2(1), 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  32. KPMG (2006). Shared services in the higher education sector: Report to HEFCE by KPMG. Higher Education Funding Council for England.

  33. Lacity, M. C., & Fox, J. (2008). Creating Global Shared Services: Lessons from REUTERS. Management Information Systems Quarterly Executive, 7(1), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research. Informing Science Journal, 9, 181–212.

    Google Scholar 

  35. McIvor, R., McCracken, M., & McHugh, M. (2011). Creating outsourced shared services arrangements: Lessons from the public sector. European Management Journal(In Press), 1-14.

  36. McKelvey, B. (1982). Organizational systematics–taxonomy, evolution, classification. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1999). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miskon, S., Bandara, W., Fielt, E., & Gable, G. (2010). Understanding Shared Services: An Exploration of the IS Literature. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 2(4), 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nadler, D., Tushman, M., & Nadler, M. B. (1997). Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Niehaves, B., & Krause, A. (2010). Shared service strategies in local government – a multiple case study exploration. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(3), 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Quinn, B., Cooke, R. S., & Kris, A. (2000). Shared services: mining for corporate gold: Financial Times Prentice Halls.

  42. Schulz, V., & Brenner, W. (2010). Characteristics of shared service centers. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(3), 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schulz, V., Hochstein, A., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2009). Definition and Classification of IT-Shared-Service-Center. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. San Francisco, California.

  44. Shang, S., & Seddon, P. B. (2002). Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager’s perspective. Information Systems Journal, 12(4), 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shrivastava, P. (1983). A Typology of Organizational Learning Systems. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sia, S. K., Soh, C., & Weill, P. (2008). IT Governance in Global Enterprises: Managing in Asia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Paris, France.

  47. Singh, P. J., & Craike, A. (2008). Shared services: towards a more holistic conceptual definition. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 3(3), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Smorul, M., JaJa, J., Wang, Y., & McCall, F. (2004). PAWN: Producer – Archive Workflow Network in Support of Digital Preservation. http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~joseph/pawn-july2-2004.pdf. Accessed June 2011.

  49. Su, N., Akkiraju, R., Nayak, N., & Goodwin, R. (2009). Shared Services Transformation: Conceptualization and Valuation from the Perspective of Real Options. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tomiuk, D., & Pinsonneault, A. (2008). Applying relationship theories to web site design: development and validation of a site-communality scale. Information Systems Journal, 1-23.

  51. Ulbrich, F. (2006). Improving shared service implementation: adopting lessons from the BPR movement. Business Process Management Journal, 12(2), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ulrich, D. (1995). Shared services: From vogue to value. HR. Human Resource Planning, 18(3), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  53. University of Southern Queensland: Annual Report (2010). Queensland: University of Southern Queensland.

  54. Walsh, P., McGregor-Lowndes, M., & Newton, C. (2008). Shared Services: Lessons from the Public and Private Sectors for the Nonprofit Sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(2), 200–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Walters, A. (2009). Improving student exerience through collaboration - student computing initiatives at the University of Newcastle. Proceedings of the Educause Australasia Conference. Perth, Western Australia.

  56. Wang, W., & Sedera, D. (2011). A Framework for Understanding the Benefits of Supply Chain Management Systems. Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Brisbane, Australia.

  57. Wang, S., & Wang, H. (2007). Shared services beyond sourcing the back offices: Organizational design. Human Systems Management, 26, 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii.

  59. Yee, J. (2009). Assesing the Potential of Inter-Organizational Shared Services. Masters thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

  60. Yee, J., Tan, F.T.C., & Chan, T. (2009). A preliminary decision model for shared services: insights from an Australian University context. Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Melbourne.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suraya Miskon.

Additional information

Responsible Editors: Frank Ulbrich and Mark Borman

Appendix A: Mapping the Case Studies to the Core Themes

Appendix A: Mapping the Case Studies to the Core Themes

Table 2.

Table 2 Summary of 36 case studies coded against the three dimensions (D1, D2 and D3).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miskon, S., Fielt, E., Bandara, W. et al. Towards a typology of structural arrangements for shared services: evidence from the higher education sector. Electron Markets 23, 149–162 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-012-0116-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Shared services
  • Organizational structure
  • Typology
  • Archival analysis
  • Case studies
  • Higher education

JEL classification

  • I23
  • L22
  • M15
  • O30