The shining piece of the puzzle: evidence of plant use in the Late Palaeolithic

  • Iwona Sobkowiak-Tabaka
  • Bernadeta Kufel-Diakowska
Original Paper
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The Late Glacial site Lubrza 10 yielded new archaeological and use-wear data for discussing the development of plant-based technologies long before the occupation of the European Lowlands by Neolithic societies. More than 4000 Federmesser and Swiderian lithic artefacts were collected from the site, which is located on sandy kames adjacent to former water bodies. Use-wear analysis showed that abandoned tools were engaged in the activities well recognised as Palaeolithic ones, such as hunting, working hide, bone and other soft and hard materials. Microscopic observations have also produced some of the earliest evidence of processing non-woody plants in the North European Plain. There is a considerable number of artefacts with plant-like polish. Tools were used for whittling, splitting, scraping or stripping plant materials—motions that could have also been made while extracting of fibres and other raw materials necessary for making crafts. Morphological parameters of tools suggest a selection of flint implements, and their distribution shows the locations of processing plants. Results of previously conducted pollen and macro-remains analysis demonstrate the presence of a great variety of plants, including high silica content herbaceous species that covered the nearest vicinity of the site both during the Allerød and the Younger Dryas.

Keywords

Late Palaeolithic Lithic tools Use-wear analysis Processing of plants 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland under grant no. 2011/01/D/HS3/04134.

References

  1. Adovasio JM (1975-1977) The textile and basketry impressions from Jarmo. Paleorient 3(1):223–230.  https://doi.org/10.3406/paleo.1975.4198
  2. Adovasio JM, Soffer O, Klíma B (1996) Upper Palaeolithic fibre technology: interlaced woven finds from Pavlov I, Czech Republic, c. 26,000 years ago. Antiquity 70:526–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adovasio, JM, Soffer O, Hyland DC, Klíma B, Svoboda J (1999) Textil, kosíkárství a site v mladém paleolitu Moravy (textiles, basketry and nets in upper Paleolithic Moravia). Archeologické rozhledy LI: 58–94Google Scholar
  4. Barton N (1991) Technological innovation and continuity at the end of the Pleistocene in Britain. In: Barton N, Roberts AJ, Roe DA (eds) The Late Glacial in north-west Europe: human adaptation and environmental change at the end of the Pleistocene. Council for British Archaeology Research Report 77, Oxford, pp 234–245Google Scholar
  5. Barton N, Ford S, Collcutt S, Crowther J, Macphail R, Rhodes E, Van Gijn A (2009) A final upper Palaeolithic site at Nea farm, Somerley, Hampshire (England) and some reflections on the occupation of Britain in the Late Glacial Interstadial. Quartär 56:1–29Google Scholar
  6. Beugnier V, Crombé P (2005) Étude fonctionnelle du matériel en silex du site mésolithique ancien de Verrebroek (Flandres, Belgique): premiers résultats. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française 102(3):527–538.  https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2005.13140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodu P, Valentin B (1997) Groupes à Federmesser ou Aziliens dans le sud l’ouest du Bassin parisien, Propositiona pour un noveau modèle d’évolution. Bulletin de la Societe prehistorique francaise 94(3):431–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogaard A, Charles M, Twiss KC, Henecke J (2009) Private pantries and celebrated surplus: storing and sharing food at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, central Anatolia. Antiquity 83:6–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borel A, Ollé A, Vergès JM, Sala R (2014) Scanning electron and optical light microscopy: two complementary approaches for the understanding and interpretation of usewear and residues on stone tools. J Archaeol Sci 48:46–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bravermanova M, Břézinová H (1999) Nekolik poznamek k clanku ,,Textil, kosikarstvi a site v mladem paleolitu Moravy”. Archeologicke rozhledy LI:113–118Google Scholar
  11. Bronk Ramsey C, Lee S (2013) Recent and planned development of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55:3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buňatová M (1999) Textilni produce v mladem paleolitu. Experiment pro dokumentární film “Úsvit géniů”—textile production in the upper Palaeolithic. An experiment for a documentary film “Úsvit géniů”. Archeologické rozhledy LI:104-112Google Scholar
  13. Burdukiewicz JM (2011) Late Glacial hunter-gatherer reactions to the Younger Dryas cooling event in the southern and eastern Baltic regions of Europe. Quat Int 242(2):302–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caspar J-P, Martial P, Féray P (2005) Identification et reconstitution des traces de teillage des fibres végétales au Néolithique. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 102(4):867–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gassin B (1996) Évolution socio-économique dans le Chasséen de la grotte de l’Église supérieure (Var): l’apport de l’analyse fonctionnelle des industries lithiques. CNRS éditions (coll. Monographie du CRA) 17, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Glory A (1959) Débris de corde paleólithique à la Grotte de Lascaux. Mémories de la Société Préhistorique Française 5:135–169Google Scholar
  17. Gueret C, Jacquier J (2016) The Pleistocene–Holocene transition from the techno-functional perspective: latest developments. Paper presented at XXVIIIe Congrès Préhistorique de France. Préhistoire de l’Europe du Nord-Ouest: mobilités, climats et identités culturelles. Session 3.L’Europe du Nord-Ouest autour de 10 000 BP (9 600 cal. BC): quels changements?, 30 Mai-4 June 2016, Amiens, FranceGoogle Scholar
  18. Guéret C, Gassin B, Jacquier J, Marchand G (2014) Traces of plant working in the Mesolithic shell midden of Beg-an-Dorchenn (Plomeur, France). Mesolithic Miscellany 22(3):3–15Google Scholar
  19. Hardy K (2016) Plants as raw materials. In: Hardy K, Kubiak-Martens L (eds) Wild harvest plants in the hominin and pre-agrarian human worlds, Studying Scientific Archaeology 2. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 71–90Google Scholar
  20. Hyland DC, Zhushchikhovskaya IS, Medvedev VE, Tabarev AV, Derevianko AP (2002) Pleistocene textiles in the Russian Far East: impressions from some of the world’s oldest pottery. Anthropologie (Brno) 40(1):1–10Google Scholar
  21. Jacquier J (2014) Analyse fonctionnelle des outillages lithiques et interprétations socio-économique du statut des sites tardiglaciaires du Buhot à Calleville (Eure) et de la Fosse à Villiers-Charlemagne (Mayenne). In: Langlais M, Naudinot N, Peresani M (eds) Les groupes culturels de la transition Pléistocène-Holocène entre Atlantique et Adriatique. Actes de la séance de la Société préhistorique française de Bordeaux, 24–25 mai 2012, Société préhistorique française, (Séances de la Société préhistorique française, 3), Paris, pp 221–246Google Scholar
  22. Juel Jensen H (1994) Flint tools and plant working: hidden traces of stone age technology: a use wear study of some Danish Mesolithic and TRB implements. Åarhus Unversity Press, ÅarhusGoogle Scholar
  23. Kabaciński J, Kobusiewicz M (2007) Settlement of the Hamburgian culture at Krągola, Stare Miasto parish. In: Kobusiewicz M, Kabaciński J (eds) Studies in the final Palaeolithic settlement of the great European plain. Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, pp 21–51Google Scholar
  24. Kabaciński J, Sobkowiak-Tabaka I (2010) Between east and west—a new site of the Federmessergruppen in Poland. Quartär 57:139–154.  https://doi.org/10.7485/QU57_07 Google Scholar
  25. Kaczor M (2015) Analiza schyłkowopaleolitycznych materiałów krzemiennych ze stanowiska Lubrza 10, woj. lubuskie (Analysis of the Late Paleolithic flint materials from Lubrza 10 site, Lubuskie Voivodeship). BA dissertation, University in PoznańGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaminská L (2007) The final Palaeolithic in Slovakia. In: Kobusiewicz M, Kabaciński J (eds) studies in the final Palaeolithic settlement of the great European plain. Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, pp 111–127Google Scholar
  27. Keeley LH (1980) Experimental determination of stone tool uses. A microwear analysis, prehistoric archaeology and ecology. Prehistoric Archeology and Ecology Series, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Kobusiewicz M, Kabaciński J (1992) Late Palaeolithic site at Wojnowo, Zielona Góra voivodeship. Fontes Aarchaeologici Posnanienses 37:23–46Google Scholar
  29. Kozłowski SK (1999) The Tanged Points Technocomplex. In: Kozłowski SK, Gurba J, Zaliznyak L (eds) Tanged Point Cultures in Europe. Read at the International Archaeological Symposium Lublin, September 13–16 1993. Lubelskie Materiały Archeologiczne 13, Instytut Archeologii UMCS, Lublin, pp 28–35Google Scholar
  30. Kufel B, Mikołajczyk A, Fabisiak W (2010) Raw material, production and use of lithic tools in the Neolithic of lower Silesia in the light of records from site 29 at Księginice Wielkie, distr. Strzelin. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 62:161–236Google Scholar
  31. Kufel-Diakowska B (2015) Aktywność łowców i zbieraczy: przykład obozowisk kultury hamburskiej i kultury Federmesser, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Instytut Archeologii, WrocławGoogle Scholar
  32. Kvavadze E, Bar-Yosef O, Belfer-Cohen A, Boaretto E, Jakeli N, Matskevich Z, Meshveliani T (2009) 30,000-year-old wild flax fibers. Science 325(5946):1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Langley MC, Clarkson C, Ulm S (2008) Behavioural complexity in Eurasian Neanderthal populations: a chronological examination of the archaeological evidence. Camb Archaeol J 18(3):289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leroi-Gourhan A (1982) The archaeology of Lascaux cave. Sci Am 246(6):80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Libera J, Wąs M, Zakościela A (2008) Allerödzkie obozowisko technokompleksu z tylczakami łukowymi w Pawłowie koło Zawichostu w świetle analizy technologicznej. In: Borkowski J, Libera J, Sałacińska B, Sałaciński S (eds), Krzemień czekoladowy w pradziejach. Materiały z konferencji w Orońsku, 08–10.10.2003. Studia nad gospodarką surowcami krzemiennymi w pradziejach 7, PMA, Warszawa, Lublin, pp 357–377Google Scholar
  36. Litt T, Brauer A, Goslar T, Merkt J, Bałaga K, Müller H, Ralska – Jasiewiczowa M, Stebich M, Negendank JFW (2001) Correlation and synchronisation of Late Glacial continental sequences in northern central Europe based on annually laminated lacustrine sediments. Quaternary Sci Rev 20(11):1233–1249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(00)00149-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowe JJ, Rasmussen O, Björck S, Hoek WZ, Steffensen JP, Walker MJC, Yu ZC, the INTIMATE group (2008) Synchronisation of palaeoenvironmental events in the North Atlantic region during last termination: a revised protocol recommended by the INTIMATE group. Quat Sci Rev 27(1-2):6–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2007.09.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manson SLR, Hather JG, Hillman GC (1994) Preliminary investigation of the plant macro-reamins from Dolní Věstonice II, and its implications for the role of plant foods in Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Europe. Antiquity 68(258):48–57.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00046184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mazzucco N, Gibaja Bao JF, Barrón UP, Lomas MSM, Puchol OG, Guerra MR, Guillén JIR, Martínez De Lagrán IG, Cabanilles JJ, Gazolaz JG, Gassin B (2016) Insights into the Late Mesolithic toolkit: use-wear analysis of the notched blades. Case-studies from the Iberian peninsula. Preistoria Alpina 48:151–157Google Scholar
  40. Nadel D, Danin A, Werker E, Schick T, Kislev ME, Stewart K (1994) 19,000-year-old twisted fibres from Ohalo II. Curr Anthropol 35(4):451–457.  https://doi.org/10.1086/204303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Okuniewska-Nowaczyk I, Sobkowiak-Tabaka I (2014) Palynological and archaeological studies of the Late Vistulian and Early Holocene at the Lubuskie Lake District (western Poland). Studia Quaternaria 31(1):39–50.  https://doi.org/10.2478/squa-2014-0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Osipowicz G (2015) Zorganizowane i wyspecjalizowane obozowisko zbieraczy? Z wyników badań traseologicznych i przestrzennych materiałów mezolitycznych ze stanowiska Ludowice 6. Przegląd Archeologiczny 63:59–85Google Scholar
  43. Osipowicz G (2016) Function and spatial organisation of the Mesolithic camps. Clues from sites Sąsieczno 4 and Ludowice 6, central Poland. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277474989_Function_and_spatial_organization_of_the_Mesolithic_camps_Clues_from_sites_Sasieczno_4_and_Ludowice_6_central_Poland
  44. Osipowicz G, Sobkowiak-Tabaka I (2014) New evidences for core processing of non-flint, lithic materials in the late Palaeolithic and Mesolithic of Poland. J Lithic Stud 1(1):213–226.  https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v1i1.774 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pelegrin J (2000) Les technique de débitage laminaire au Tardiglaciaire critéres de diagnose et quelques reflexions. In: Bodu P, Christensen M, Valentin B (eds) L’Europe Centrale et septentrionale au Tardiglaciaire, Table-ronde Nemours, 13–16 mai 1997. Mémoires du Musée de Préhistoire d’Ile-de-France no. 7, A.P.R.A.I.F, Nemours, pp 76–86Google Scholar
  46. Pettitt P, White M (2012) The British Palaeolithic. Hominin societies at the edge of the Pleistocene world. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Pyżewicz K (2015) The use-wear analysis of the artefacts found at the Magdalenian site in Klementowice. In: Wiśniewski T (ed) Klementowice. A Magdalenian site in eastern Poland. Institute of Archaeology Maria curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Lublin, pp 184–214Google Scholar
  48. Rast-Eicher A (2016) Fibres. Microscopy of archaeological textiles and furs. Archaeolingua, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  49. Ratajczak-Szczerba M, Okuniewska-Nowaczyk I, Sobkowiak-Tabaka I (2015) Palaeogeographical and archaeological records of natural changes of the Jordanowo–Niesulice subglacial channel near Lubrza, the Lubusz Lakeland. Quaestiones Geographicae 34(3):101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rimkutė V (2010) The Neolithic Mats of the eastern Baltic littoral. In: Strand A E, Gleba M, Mannering U, Munkholt C, Ringgaard M (eds) North European symposium for archaeological textiles X, Ancient Textiles Series 5. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 217–220Google Scholar
  51. Rimkutė V (2016) Testing twined clothing in Mesolithic. www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPOM5oPW9bs. Accessed 4 Nov 2016
  52. Rybníčková E, Rybníček K (2014) Palaeovegetation in the Pavlovské vrchy hills region (South Moravia, Czech Republic) around 25,000 bp: the Bulhary core. Veg Hist Archaeobot 23(6):719–728.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-014-0450-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schild R (1975) Późny paleolit. In: Chmielewski W, Hensel W (eds) Prahistoria ziem polskich. Paleolit i mezolit I. Ossolineum, Wrocław-Warszawa- Kraków-Gdańsk, pp 159–335Google Scholar
  54. Schild R (1984) Terminal Palaeolithic of the north European plain: a review of lost chances, potential and hopes. Advances in World Archaeol 3: 193–274Google Scholar
  55. Schild R, Królik H, Tomaszewski AJ, Ciepielewska E (2011) Rydno. A Stone Age red ochre quarry and socioeconomic center. A century of research. Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  56. Schreurs J (1992) The Michelsberg site Maastricht-Klinkers: a functional interpretation. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 25:129–171Google Scholar
  57. Semenov SA (1964) Prehistoric technology. Adams and Dart, BathGoogle Scholar
  58. Slah G (2014) Rectangular bladelets discovered at the Katra I settlement in the Varėna district of Lithuania: a functional analysis. Archaeologica Baltica 20:162–173Google Scholar
  59. Sobkowiak-Tabaka I (2016) The last Late Glacial hunter-gatherers. In: Kabaciński J (ed) The Past Societies I, 500,000–5,500 BC [Urbańczyk P. (ed), The Past Societies. Polish lands from the first evidence of human presence to the Early Middle Ages vol. I–V]. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN, Warszawa, pp 199–227Google Scholar
  60. Sobkowiak-Tabaka I, Kubiak-Martens L, Okuniewska-Nowaczyk I, Kufel-Diakowska B, Ratajczak-Szczerba M, Kurzawska A (2017) Reconstruction of the Late Glacial and Early Holocene landscape and human presence in Lubrza, western Poland, on the basis of multidisciplinary analyses. Environ Archaeol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2016.1268993. Accessed 6 Jan 2017, 1–14
  61. Sobkowiak-Tabaka I, Pyżewicz K, Okuniewska-Nowaczyk I (2018) Osadnictwo mezolityczne w południowej części Pojezierza Łagowskiego na przykładzie stanowisk w Wilenku. Folia Praehistorica Posnaniensia 22 (in press)Google Scholar
  62. Sofer O (2004) Recovering perishable technologies through use wear on tools: preliminary evidence for upper Paleolithic weaving and net making. Curr Anthropol 45(3):407–413.  https://doi.org/10.1086/420907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sofer O, Adovasio JM (2007) Textiles as well as ceramics in the upper Palaeolithic: like it or not! Archeologické rozhledy LIX:581–587Google Scholar
  64. Sofer O, Adovasio JM (2014) “Their fingers were too fat to weave”: ancient textiles and academic politics today. N Am Archaeol 35:419–437Google Scholar
  65. Sofer O, Adovasio JM, Illingworth JS, Amirkhanov KA, Praslov ND, Street M (2000a) Palaeolithic perishables made permanent. Antiquity 74(286):812–821.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00060464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sofer O, Adovasio JM, Hyland DC (2000b) The “Venus” figurines. Textiles, basketry, gender, and status in the upper Paleolithic. Curr Anthropol 41(4):511–537Google Scholar
  67. Sosna D (1999) Experimentální ovĕření výroby textilu v mladším paleolitu. Archeologické rozhledy LI:95–103Google Scholar
  68. Street M, Baales M, Cziesla E, Hartz S, Heinen M, Jöris O, Koch I, Pasda C, Terberger T, Vollbrecht J (2002) Final Paleolithic and Mesolithic research in reunified Germany. J World Prehist 15(4):365–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taute W (1963) Funde der spätpaläolithischen „Federmesser-Gruppen” aus dem Raum zwischen mittlerer Elbe und Weichsel. Berliner Jahrbuch für Vor-und Frühgeschichte 3: 62–111Google Scholar
  70. Taute W (1968). Die Stielspitzen Gruppen in nördlichen Mitteleuropa. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der späten Altsteinzeit. Böhlau Verlag, Köln—GrazGoogle Scholar
  71. Thieme H (1997) Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature 385(6619):807–810.  https://doi.org/10.1038/385807a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Torchy L, Gassin B (2011) Le silex bédoulien sur les sites chasséens du Languedoc: étude fonctionnelle, statut des sites et réseaux de diffusion. Gallia Préhistoire 53(1):59–84.  https://doi.org/10.3406/galip.2011.2487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Trąba C, Rogut K, Wolański P (2012) Rośliny dziko występujące i ich zastosowanie. Przewodnik po wybranych gatunkach. ProCarpathia, RzeszówGoogle Scholar
  74. Valoch K (2007) Textile in the Upper Palaeolithic? Some notes on the matter. Archeologické rozhledy 59(1):143–154Google Scholar
  75. Gijn AL Van (1990) The wear and tear of flint. Principles of functional analysis applied to Dutch Neolithic assemblages. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 22, Leiden University, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  76. van Gijn AL (2010) Flint in focus. Lithic biographies in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Sidestone Press, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  77. van Gijn AL, Little A (2016) Tools, use-wear and experimentation: extracting plants from stone and bone. In: Hardy K, Kubiak-Martens L (eds) Wild harvest. Plants in the hominin and pre-agrarian human worlds, Studying Scientific Archaeology 2. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 135–154Google Scholar
  78. Vaughan PC (1985) Use-wear analysis of flaked stone tools. The University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ośrodek Studiów Pradziejowych i ŚredniowiecznychInstytut Archeologii i Etnologii PANPoznańPoland
  2. 2.Instytut ArcheologiiUniwersytet WrocławskiWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations