On the performance of phase-based filters for enhancing lateral boundaries of magnetic and gravity sources: a case study of the Seattle uplift

Abstract

Determining lateral boundaries of the potential field source is a common feature in interpreting magnetic and gravity data. There are many different phase based filters to determine the boundaries of the source. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of phase-based filters such as tilt derivative, theta map, normalized horizontal derivative, tilt derivative of the horizontal derivative, tilt derivative of the total gradient, improved theta and horizontal gradient of a modified version of tilt derivative. In order to obtain optimum results, these filters were tested on synthetic magnetic and gravity anomaly data and also aeromagnetic anomaly from the Seattle Uplift (SU), Washington, United States of America. The results show that the tilt derivative of the horizontal derivative method revealed better detection of the source edges compared to the results by the other filters. These results demonstrate that the tilt derivative of the horizontal derivative method is a useful tool for the qualitative interpretation of magnetic and gravity data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  1. Assaad FA, LaMoreaux PE (2004) Surface geophysical exploration methods. In: Hughes TH (ed) Field methods for geologists and Hydrogeologists. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 51–76

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beiki M (2010) Analytic signals of gravity gradient tensor and their application to estimate source location. Geophysics 75(6):159–174

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brocher TM, Parsons T, Blakely RJ, Christensen NI, Fisher MA, Wells RE, the SHIPS Working Group (2001) Upper crustal structure in Puget lowland, Washington: results from the 1998 seismic hazards investigation in Puget Sound. J Geophys Res 106:13541–13564

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blakely RJ, Wells RE, Weaver CS (1999) Puget Sound aeromagnetic maps and data, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99–514, https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1999/of99-514.

  5. Blakely RJ, Sherrod BL, Hughes JF, Anderson ML, Wells RE, Weaver CS (2009) Saddle Mountain fault deformation zone, Olympic peninsula, Washington: Western boundary of the Seattle uplift. Geosphere 5:105–125

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen AG, Zhou TF, Liu DJ, Zhang S (2017) Application of an enhanced theta-based filter for potential field edge detection: a case study of the Luzong ore district. Chin J Geophys 60(2):203–218

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper GRJ, Cowan DR (2006) Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Comput Geosci 32:1585–1591

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper GRJ (2014) Reducing the dependence of the analytic signal amplitude of aeromagnetic data on the source vector direction. Geophysics 79:J55–J60

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper GRJ, Cowan DR (2008) Edge enhancement of potential-field data using normalized statistics. Geophysics 73(3):H1–H4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cordell L (1979) Gravimetric expression of graben faulting in Santa Fe Country and the Espanola Basin. 30th Field conference New Mexico. New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, p. 59–64

  11. Ekwok SE, Akpan AE, Ebong ED (2019) Enhancement and modelling of aeromagnetic data of some inland basins, southeastern Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 155:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ekwok SE, Akpan AE, Kudamnya EA (2020) Exploratory mapping of structures controlling mineralization in Southeast Nigeria using high resolution airborne magnetic data. J Afr Earth Sci 162:103700

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eldosouky AM (2019) Aeromagnetic data for mapping geologic contacts at Samr El-Qaa area, north Eastern Desert. Egypt Arab J Geosci 12:2

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eldosouky AM, Sehsah H, Elkhateeb SO, Pour AB (2020b) Integrating aeromagnetic data and Landsat-8 imagery for detection of post-accretionary shear zones controlling hydrothermal alterations: the Allaqi-Heiani suture zone, south Eastern Desert, Egypt. Adv Space Res 65:1008–1024

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eldosouky AM, Pham LT, Mohammed H, Pradhan B (2020a) A comparative study of THG, AS, TA, Theta, TDX and LTHG techniques for improving source boundaries detection of magnetic data using synthetic models: a case study from G. um Monqul, north Eastern Desert, Egypt. Journal of African earth sciences 170: 103940

  16. Evjen HM (1936) The place of the vertical gradient in gravitational interpretations. Geophysics 1(1):127–136

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fairhead JD, Williams S (2006) Evaluating normalized magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. 76th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, p. 845–848

  18. Fedi M, Florio G (2001) Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method. Geophys Prospect 49(1):40–58

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ferreira FJF, de Souza J, de Bongiolo ABeS, de Castro LG (2013) Enhancement of the total horizontal gradient of magnetic anomalies using the tilt angle. Geophysics 78(3):J33–J41

  20. Hinze W, Frese R, Saad A (2012) Gravity and magnetic exploration, principles, practices and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p ix

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hirsch DM, Babcock RS (2009) Spatially heterogeneous burial and high-P/T metamorphism in the crescent formation, Olympic peninsula, Washington. Am Mineral 94(8–9):1103–1110

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu SK, Coppense D, Shyu CT (1996) High- resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential field anomalies: an enhanced analytic signal technique. Geophysics 61:1947–1957

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson SY, Potter CJ, Miller JJ, Armentrout JM, Finn C, Weaver CS (1996) The southern Whidbey Island fault: an active structure in the Puget lowland, Washington. Geol Soc Am Bull 108(3):334–354

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson SY, Blakely RJ, Stephenson WJ, Dadisman SV, Fisher MA (2004) Active shortening of the Cascadia forearc and implications for seismic hazards of the Puget lowland. Tectonics 23:TC1011

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mace CG, Keranen KM (2012) Oblique fault systems crossing the Seattle Basin: geophysical evidence for additional shallow fault systems in the central Puget lowland. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 117:B3

    Google Scholar 

  26. Miller HG, Singh V (1994) Potential field tilt a new concept for location of potential field sources. J Appl Geophys 32:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lamb AP, Liberty LM, Blakely RJ, Pratt TL, Sherrod BL, van Wijk K (2012) Western limits of the Seattle fault zone and its interaction with the Olympic peninsula, Washington. Geosphere 8(4):915–930

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, Ma G, Du X (2012) Edge detection in potential-field data by enhanced mathematical morphology filter. Pure Appl Geophys 170(4):645–653

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nabighian MN, Ander ME, Grauch VJS, Hansen RO, LaFehr TR, Li Y et al (2005a) Historical development of the gravity method in exploration. Geophysics 70(6):63–89

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nabighian MN, Grauch VJS, Hansen RO, LaFehr TR, Li Y, Peirce JW et al (2005b) The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration. Geophysics 70(6):33–61

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nabighian MN (1972) The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use of automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics 37:507–517

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nasuti Y, Nasuti A, Moghadas D (2018) STDR: a novel approach for enhancing and edge detection of potential field data. Pure Appl Geophys 176(2):827–841

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oksum E, Dolmaz MN, Pham LT (2019) Inverting gravity anomalies over the Burdur sedimentary basin, SW Turkey. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica 54:445–460

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pham LT, Oksum E, Do TD (2018a) GCH_gravinv: a MATLAB-based program for inverting gravity anomalies over sedimentary basins. Comput Geosci 120:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pham LT, Do TD, Oksum E, Le ST (2019a) Estimation of curie point depths in the southern Vietnam continental shelf using magnetic data. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 41(3):216–228

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pham LT, Oksum E, Gómez-Ortiz D, Do TD (2020a) MagB_inv: a high performance Matlab program for estimating the magnetic basement relief by inverting magnetic anomalies. Comput Geosci 134:104347

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pham LT, Oksum E, Do TD, Vu MD (2020b) Comparison of different approaches of computing the tilt angle of the total horizontal gradient and tilt angle of the analytic signal amplitude for detecting source edges. Bulletin of the mineral research and exploration 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.746858

  38. Pham LT, Oksum E, Do TD, Le-Huy M (2018b) New method for edges detection of magnetic sources using logistic function. Geofizichesky Zhurnal 40(6):127–135

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pham LT, Oksum E, Do TD (2019b) Edge enhancement of potential field data using the logistic function and the total horizontal gradient. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica 54:143–155

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pham LT, Oksum E, Do TD, Le-Huy M, Vu MD, Nguyen VD (2019c) LAS: a combination of the analytic signal amplitude and the generalised logistic function as a novel edge enhancement of magnetic data. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 49(4):425–440

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pham LT, Vu TV, Le-Thi S, Trinh PT (2020c) Enhancement of potential field source boundaries using an improved logistic filter. Pure Appl Geophys 177:5237–5249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02542-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pham LT (2020) A comparative study on different filters for enhancing potential field source boundaries: synthetic examples and a case study from the song Hong trough (Vietnam). Arab J Geosci 13:723

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pham LT, Do TD, Oksum E, Do TD (2018c) A new method for edge detection in interpretation of potential field data. Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design 6(4):637–642

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pham LT, Le-Huy M, Oksum E, Do TD (2018d) Determination of maximum tilt angle from analytic signal amplitude of magnetic data by the curvature-based method. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 40(4):354–366

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rao DB, Babu NR (1991) A rapid method for three-dimensional modeling of magnetic anomalies. Geophysics 56(11):1729–1737

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rao DB, Prakash MJ, Ramesh Babu N (1990) 3-D and 2 1/2-D modeling of gravity anomalies with variable density contrast. Geophys Prospect 38:411–422

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sherrod BL, Blakely RJ, Weaver CS, Kelsey HM, Barnett E, Liberty L et al (2008) Finding concealed active faults: extending the southern Whidbey Island fault across the Puget lowland, Washington. J Geophys Res 113:B05313

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stewart ICF, Miller DT (2018) Directional tilt derivatives to enhance structural trends in aeromagnetic grids. J Appl Geophys 159:553–563

    Google Scholar 

  49. Teixidó T (2012) The surface geophysical methods: a useful tool for the engineer. Procedia Engineering 46:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wijns C, Perez C, Kowalczyk P (2005) Theta map: edge detection in magnetic data. Geophysics 70:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yan TJ, Wu YG, Yuan Y, Chen LN (2016) Edge detection of potential field data using an enhanced analytic signal tilt angle. Chin J Geophys 59(4):341–349

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang JM, Zeng ZF, Wu YG, Du W, Wang YZ (2020) Balanced morphological filters for horizontal boundaries enhancement of the potential field sources. Appl Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-018-0719

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luan Thanh Pham.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on New Advances and Research Results on the Geology of Africa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pham, L.T., Oksum, E., Do, T.D. et al. On the performance of phase-based filters for enhancing lateral boundaries of magnetic and gravity sources: a case study of the Seattle uplift. Arab J Geosci 14, 129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06511-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Boundary detection
  • Phase-based filer
  • Magnetic
  • Gravity
  • Seattle uplift