Seismic microzonation of Ubhur district, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, using H/V spectral ratio

  • Maher Aldahri
  • Mahmoud El-Hadidy
  • Hani Zahran
  • Kamal Abdelrahman Hassanein
Original Paper
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

Ubhur district is the northern extension of Jeddah. A lot of the new investments and mega structures will be constructed in this area; the highest skyscraper in the Arabian Gulf region will be built in Ubhur. The surface geology of the investigated region is complex, where the sabkha deposits spread everywhere. The subsurface structure of the subsurface soil is complex and includes different soil classes. Microtremor data was acquired at 76 sites located in Ubhur district. The horizontal to vertical spectral ratio technique is used to determine the resonance frequency (f0) and the maximum amplification factor (A0) at the selected sites. This technique is considered as the cheapest and most reliable one for determining the resonance frequency. The acquired data was processed using the Geopsy software where the reliability of the H/V curves and peaks was considered through the data processing and analysis. The results indicate that the predominant resonance frequency of Ubhur district ranges between 0.77 and 5.7 Hz, while the maximum amplification factors range from 2 to 6. It is indicated that the central zone of the Ubhur district is considered suitable for the construction of high-rise facilities compared to other parts of the region, which should be taken into consideration during land use planning.

Keywords

Amplification factor Resonance frequency Land use planning Ubhur Saudi Arabia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research group (No. RG-1436-011). The authors would like to thank the Saudi Geological Survey for availability of the instruments during the field survey.

References

  1. Aldahri M, Mogren S, Abdelrahman K, Zahran H, El Hady S, El-Hadidy M (2017) Surface soil assessment in the Ubhur area, north of Jeddah, western Saudi Arabia, using a multichannel analysis of surface waves method. J Geol Soc India 89(4):435–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-017-0626-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali KM, Hossain D (1988) Geotechnical and geochemical characteristics of Ubhur sub-soil. J.K.A.U. Earth Sci 1:205–225Google Scholar
  3. Al-Qarni H (2015) Seismic microzonation of Jeddah City, Western Saudi Arabia, Msc thesis, Geophysics Department (Geophysics), Faculty of Science, King Saud UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Saifi MM, Qari MY (1996) Application of Landsat thematic mapper data in sabkha studies at the Red Sea coast. Int J Remote Sens 17(3):527–536.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169608949025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambraseys NN, Melville CP, Adams RD (1994) The seismicity of Egypt, Arabia and the Red Sea: a historical review. Cambridge University Press, UK, p 181.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524912 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aqeel AM (2007) Geotechnical investigation of sabkha hazards at the northern part of Obhor area. Thesis of Degree Master of Science in Applied Geology (Engineering Geology). Faculty of Earth Sciences (King Abdulaziz University)Google Scholar
  7. Bahafzullah A, Fayed LA, Kazi A, Al-Saify M (1993) Classification and distribution of the Red Sea coastal sabkha near Jeddah-Saudi Arabia. Carbonate Evaporates 8(1):23–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03175160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosworth W, Huchon P, McClay K (2005) The Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden basins. J Afr Earth Sci 43(1-3):334–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duval AM, Bard PY, Meneroud JP, Vidal S (1994) Usefulness of microtremor measurements for site effect studies. In: Duma G (ed) Proceedings of the tenth European conference on earthquake engineering, Vienna, Austria, I. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 521–528Google Scholar
  10. El-Hadidy SY (2015) Seismicity and seismotectonic setting of the Red Sea and adjacent areas. In: Rasul NMA, Stewart ICF (eds) The Red Sea. Springer Earth System Sciences, Berlin, pp 151–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45201-1_8 Google Scholar
  11. Huan C (1997) The validity of single-station H/V ratio for site response estimation using the dahan downhole array, Hualien, Taiwan, TAO, The Ministry of Economic Affairs, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson PR (1999) Proterozoic geology of western Saudi Arabia–Southern sheet: Saudi Geological Survey Open-File Report USGS-OF-99-7Google Scholar
  13. Konno K, Ohmachi T (1998) Ground motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:228–241Google Scholar
  14. Lermo J, Chaves-Garcia FJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83(5):1574–1594Google Scholar
  15. Mohamed A (2003) Estimating earthquake ground motions at the northwestern part of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Ph.D. thesis, Fac. Sc., Ain Shams Uni. Pp 93–138Google Scholar
  16. Morris PG (1975) Construction materials, non-metallic minerals occurrence and engineering geology of the district around Jeddah, Dir. Gen. Miner. Resour., Technical Record TR-75-1, 27P. Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Mucciarelli M (1998) Reliability and applicability of Nakamura’s technique using microtremors: an experimental approach. J Earthq Eng 2(4):1–14Google Scholar
  18. Mucciarelli M, Contri P, Monachesi G, Calvano G (1997) Towards an empirical method to instrumentally assess the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings, Proceedings of Conference on Disaster Mitigation and Information Technology, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor of the ground surface QR of RTRI. 30(1):89–94Google Scholar
  20. Nakamura Y (1996) Real-time information systems for hazards mitigation. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  21. Roobol MJ, Al-Rehaili M, Arab N, Celebi M, Halawani MA, Janjou D, Kazi A, Martin C, Sahl M, Showail A (1999) The Gulf of Aqaba earthquake of 22 November 1995: its effects in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabian Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources Technical Report BRGM-TR-99-16, 67 p 49 figs, 4 tables, 1 appendixGoogle Scholar
  22. SESAME (2004) Site effects assessment using ambient excitations, European research Project. http://sesamefp5.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr
  23. Zahran HM, Sokolov VM, Roobol J, Stewart IC, El-Hadidy SY, El-Hadidy M (2016) On the development of a seismic source zonation model for seismic hazard assessment in western Saudi Arabia. J Seismol 20(3):747–769.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-016-9555-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maher Aldahri
    • 1
  • Mahmoud El-Hadidy
    • 2
  • Hani Zahran
    • 1
  • Kamal Abdelrahman Hassanein
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Saudi Geological SurveyJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Seismology DepartmentNational Research Institute of Astronomy and GeophysicsCairoEgypt
  3. 3.Geology and Geophysics DepartmentKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations