An improved version of innovative trend analyses

Original Paper
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

Systematic and random changes occur in any hydro-meteorological record and have significant effects on human activities on time and space scales. Although it is almost impossible to forecast the future behavior of any natural event accurately, researchers can identify trend on systematic variations and seasonality rather accurately with random residual parts. On the other hand, the role of trend is very significant in climate change studies and the Mann-Kendall test is the most employed method for trend identification. However, this method requires restrictive assumptions such as the data length, normality, and serial independence. Recently, innovative trend analysis (ITA) method is suggested for detailed trend determination and classification interpretations in a given time series without restrictive assumptions. In this study, an ITA-change boxes (CB) approach is proposed, taking into account quantitative changes with increasing or decreasing trends of the two half-time series obtained from the data. Given the periodicity of the hydro-meteorological data, the data group is used to obtain two half-time series instead of the data. This allows the researcher to numerically observe changes in trends beyond visualization. This approach assists to make more detailed interpretations about trend possibilities within a given time series. The applications of the proposed approach are presented for daily temperature and monthly rainfall and discharge records from Turkey, UK, and the USA.

Keywords

Innovative trend analysis Trend Time series Nonparametric methods 

References

  1. Agha OMAM, Şarlak N (2016) Spatial and temporal patterns of climate variables in Iraq. Arab J Geosci 9(4):302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2324-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayazit M, Önöz B (2007) To pre-whiten or not to pre-whiten in trend analysis? Hydrol Sci J 52(4):611–624.  https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.4.611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouza-Deaño R, Ternero-Rodrìguez M, Fernàndez-Espinosa AJ (2008) Trend study and assessment of surface water quality in the Ebro River (Spain). J Hydrol 361(3-4):227–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dabanlı İ, Şen Z, Yeleğen M, Şişman E, Selek B, Güçlü Y (2016) Trend assessment by the innovative-Şen method. Water Resour Manag 30(14):5193–5203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1478-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elouissi A, Şen Z, Habi M (2016) Algerian rainfall innovative trend analysis and its implications to Macta watershed. Arab J Geosci 9(4):303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2325-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Güçlü YS, Şişman E, Yeleğen MÖ (2016) Climate change and frequency-intensity-duration (FID) curves for Florya station İstanbul. J Flood Risk Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12229
  7. Partal T, Kahya E (2006) Trend analysis in Turkish precipitation data. Hydrol Process 20(9):2011–2026.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kahya E, Kalayci S (2004) Trend analysis of streamflow in Turkey. J Hydrol 289(1–4):128–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13(3):245–259.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Öztopal A, Şen Z (2016) Innovative trend methodology applications to precipitation records in Turkey. Water Resour Manag 31(3):727–737.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1343-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sonali P, Kumar Nagesh D (2013) Review of trend detection methods and their application to detect temperature changes in India. J Hydrol 476:212–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Şen Z (2012) Innovative trend analysis methodology. J HydrolEng 17(9):1042–1046Google Scholar
  14. Şen Z (2014) Trend identification simulation and application. J HydrolEng 19(3):635–642Google Scholar
  15. Şen Z (2017a) Hydrological trend analysis with innovative and over-whitening procedures. Hydrol Sci J 62:1–12Google Scholar
  16. Şen Z (2017b) Innovative trend significance test and applications. TheorApplClimatol 127(3-4):939–947.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1681-x Google Scholar
  17. Timbadiya P, Mirajkar A, Patel P, Porey P (2013) Identification of trend and probability distribution for time series of annual peak flow in Tapi Basin, India. ISH Int J HydrocarbEng 19(1):11–20Google Scholar
  18. von Storch H (1995) Misuses of statistical analysis in climate research. In: Storch HV, Navarra A (eds) Analysis of climate variability: applications of statistical techniques. Springer, New York, pp 11–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03167-4_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yue S, Wang CY (2002) Applicability of prewhitening to eliminate the influence of serial correlation on the Mann-Kendall test. Water Resour Res 38(6):4–1-4-7.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yue S, Pilon P, Phinney B, Cavadias G (2002) The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series. Hydrol Process 16(9):1807–1829.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering Department, Hydraulics and Water Resources DivisionBingol UniversityBingolTurkey

Personalised recommendations