Advertisement

Vegetation damage assessment due to Hudhud cyclone based on NDVI using Landsat-8 satellite imagery

  • Venkata Giri Raj Kumar Konda
  • Venkatesh Reddy Chejarla
  • Venkata Ravibabu Mandla
  • Vani Voleti
  • Nagaveni Chokkavarapu
Original Paper
  • 200 Downloads

Abstract

Developing nations are abandoned against tropical cyclones because of climatic changeability; the atmosphere is probably going to expand the recurrence and extent of some outrageous climate and calamity occasions. Urban areas and towns arranged along the coastline front belt in Visakhapatnam region experienced serious harm because of Hudhud cyclone, which happened on October 12, 2014. The fundamental motivation behind this exploration was to distinguish the vegetation damage in Visakhapatnam and neighbouring towns. In this analysis, Landsat-8 satellite datasets procured prior and then afterward the cyclone have been utilized; image processing techniques have been completed to evaluate the progressions of pre- and post-disaster condition. Vegetation index strategy was utilized to assess the damage to vegetation. Arrangement results and land utilize land cover change investigation demonstrate that 13.25% of agriculture Kharif and 31.1% of vegetation was damaged. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) maps were produced for the previously, then after the cyclone circumstance, and vegetation biomass damage was evaluated in Visakhapatnam and Bhimunipatanam. General loss of vegetation in both the spots was 30.67 and 43.37 km2. The result of this review can be utilized by decision makers for the post-disaster support for rebuilding of influenced regions.

Keywords

Hudhud cyclone LULC NDVI Vegetation damage assessment Remote sensing and GIS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank editor and anonymous reviews for their valuable suggestion and also would like to thank Dr. Colil Arrowsmith, A/Professor, RMIT, Australia, for his suggestions on manuscript and proof reading.

References

  1. Asrar G, Fuchs M, Kanemasu ET, Hatfield JL (1984) Estimating absorbed photosynthetic radiation and leaf area index from spectral reflectance in wheat. Agron J 76(2):300–306.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600020029x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson PM, Lewis P (2000) Geo-statistical classification for remote sensing: an introduction. Comput Geosci 26(4):361–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00117-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bausch C, Walter (1993) Soil background effects on reflectance-based crop coefficients for corn. Remote Sens Environ 46:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benefetti R, Paolo R (1993) On the use of NDVI profiles as a tool for agricultural statistics: the case study of wheat yield estimates and forecast in Emilia Romagna. Remote Sens Environ 45(3):311–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90113-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhowmik A, Cabral P (2011) Damage and posyt-cyclone regeneration assessment of the sundarbans botanic biodiversity caused by the cyclone sidr. 1st world sustainability forumGoogle Scholar
  6. Deering DW, Haas RH (1980) Using Landsat digital data for estimating green biomass. NASA Technical Memorandum, Greenbelt, p 2Google Scholar
  7. Disaster Management of India: A status Report, Natural Disaster Management Division, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi (2004) http://saarcsdmc.nic.in/pdf/publications/journal/chapter-9.pdf . Accessed on 24 Jan 2015
  8. Douglas I (1999) Hydrological investigations of forest disturbance and land cover impacts in South-East Asia: a review. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Series B 354(1391):1725–1738.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1999.0516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. HUDHUD Damage Assessment & Relief Monitoring System Government of Andhra Pradesh (2014) http://hudhud.ap.gov.in/HDRMS/UserInterface/Loginform.aspx, Accessed on 25 Jan 2015
  10. Jensen JR (2004) Introductory digital image processing, 3rd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 544Google Scholar
  11. Kaufmann RK, Zhou L-M, Myneni RB, Tucker CJ, Slayback D, Shabanov NV, Pinzon J (2003) The effect of vegetation on surface temperature: a statistical analysis of NDVI and climate data. Geophys Res Lett 30:21–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nisha R, Mandla VR, Singh T (2016) Evaluation of atmospheric corrections on hyperspectral data with special reference to mineral mapping. Geosci Front 8(4):797–808.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2016.06.004 Google Scholar
  13. Penner JE (1994) Atmospheric chemistry and air quality. In: Meyer WB, Turner BL II (eds) Changes in land use and land cover: a global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 175–209Google Scholar
  14. Revenue Disaster Management Department, Govt of Andhra Pradesh (2005), disaster management.ap.gov.in, Accessed on 20 Dec 2014
  15. Richardson AJ, Wiegand CL (1977) Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information. Photogramm Eng 43:1541–1552Google Scholar
  16. Rogan J, Chen D (2004) Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use change. Prog Plan 61(4):301–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(03)00066-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skole DL (1994) Data on global land-cover change: acquisition, assessment and analysis. In: Meyer WB, Turner BL II (eds) Changes in land use and land cover: a global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 437–471Google Scholar
  18. Tarun T, Mandla VR, Srinivas T, Mahendra (2013) Evaluation of various image classification techniques on Landsat for identifies coral reefs, Geomatics. Nat Haz Risk 5(2):173–184Google Scholar
  19. Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8(2):127–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vani V, Mandla VR (2017) Comparative study of NDVI and SAVI vegetation indices in Anantapur district semi-arid areas. Int J Civil Eng Technol l8(4):559–566Google Scholar
  21. Vitousek PM (1994) Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75(7):1861–1876.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1941591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wanjura DF, Hatfield JL (1987) Sensitivity of spectral vegetation indices to crop. Biomass 30:810–816Google Scholar
  23. Wu W, Shao G (2002) Optimal combinations of data, classifiers, and sampling methods for accurate characterization of deforestation. Can J Remote Sens 28(4):601–609.  https://doi.org/10.5589/m02-050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Venkata Giri Raj Kumar Konda
    • 1
  • Venkatesh Reddy Chejarla
    • 2
  • Venkata Ravibabu Mandla
    • 3
  • Vani Voleti
    • 1
  • Nagaveni Chokkavarapu
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Disaster Mitigation and Management (CDMM)VIT UniversityVelloreIndia
  2. 2.OS-GST Lab, Department of Environmental and Water Resources Engineering, School of Civil and Chemical Engineering (SCALE)VIT UniversityVelloreIndia
  3. 3.Centre for Geoinformatics Applications in Rural Development (CGARD), School of Science, Technology and Knowledge SystemsNational Institute of Rural Development & Panchayati Raj (NIRD&PR)HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations