Skip to main content
Log in

Waarom potentiële belangenconflicten niet bestaan

  • Forum
  • Published:
Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatuur

  1. Goossens FX. Taking snapshots of preventive interventions. On the effectiveness of preventive interventions for youth and how it relates to implementation and conflict of interest. (Proefschrift). Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCoy MS, Ezekiel EJ. Why there are no ‘potential’ conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2017;317:1721–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.2308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winter L de, Verhagen AM, Goossens FX. Dubbelrollen in effectonderzoek. Psycholoog. 2016;51(6):41–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferry Goossens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goossens, F. Waarom potentiële belangenconflicten niet bestaan. Tijdschr Gezondheidswet 96, 17–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12508-017-0096-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12508-017-0096-8

Navigation