Skip to main content
Log in

‘Doe ik het wel goed?’

Risico’s van fasebenadering van rouw à la Kübler-Ross

  • Praktijk
  • Published:
Pallium Aims and scope

Samenvatting

Het fasedenken over rouw, zoals dat door Elisabeth Kübler-Ross in 1969 in een model is vastgelegd, is helaas uitgegroeid tot een wetmatigheid. Dat heeft schadelijke gevolgen. We moeten het fasedenken dus laten vallen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatuur

  • Kübler-Ross E & Kessler D. 2005. On Grief and Grieving: Finding the Meaning of Grief Through the Five Stages of Loss. New York: Scribner.

  • Kübler-Ross E. 1969. On death and dying. New York: The Macmillan.

  • Friedman R & James JW. 2008. The myth of the stages of dying, death and grief. Altedena, CA: Skeptic, 14, 37-42.

  • Bonanno GA, & Boerner K. 2007. The stage theory of grief. JAMA, 297, 2692-4.

  • Stroebe MS Schut HAW & Boerner K. 2017. Caution health care professionals: Bereaved persons are misguided through the stages of grief. Omega, 74, 455–473.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stroebe, M., Schut, H. & Boerner, K. ‘Doe ik het wel goed?’. Pallium 20, 10–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12479-018-0022-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12479-018-0022-z

Navigation